利奥波多·西亚的批判普遍主义。这是一种关于思想史和历史哲学的辩证认识论

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY
Iver Beltrán-García
{"title":"利奥波多·西亚的批判普遍主义。这是一种关于思想史和历史哲学的辩证认识论","authors":"Iver Beltrán-García","doi":"10.4067/s0717-554x2020000300267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clarifying a set of epistemological and axiological stances and ideas of Zea (historicist realitivism, circumstantialism, perspectivism, pragmatism, political approach, rational autonomy of the theory, idea of concrete universality, dependency problem, dialectical assimilation), this paper elaborates the concept of critical universalism, which tie them up in an organized unit, and develops the structure and dynamism of this concept, describing its dialectic. The methodology is interpretative in the sense of a conceptual elaboration of the explicit and implicit contents in the work of this philosopher. Through the concept of critical universalism and its dialectics, the complementary relationship between the historicist and pragmatic-political criticism of the Mexican philosopher and his quest for universal knowledge and values are made visible, and a method is provided to study the life of knowledge and values in its concrete historicity and its political implications, without renouncing rational universality; method that, beyond the work of Zea, can be useful for the history of ideas and the philosophy of history in general.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":"8 1","pages":"267-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El universalismo crítico de Leopoldo Zea. Una epistemología dialéctica para la historia de las ideas y la filosofía de la historia\",\"authors\":\"Iver Beltrán-García\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0717-554x2020000300267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clarifying a set of epistemological and axiological stances and ideas of Zea (historicist realitivism, circumstantialism, perspectivism, pragmatism, political approach, rational autonomy of the theory, idea of concrete universality, dependency problem, dialectical assimilation), this paper elaborates the concept of critical universalism, which tie them up in an organized unit, and develops the structure and dynamism of this concept, describing its dialectic. The methodology is interpretative in the sense of a conceptual elaboration of the explicit and implicit contents in the work of this philosopher. Through the concept of critical universalism and its dialectics, the complementary relationship between the historicist and pragmatic-political criticism of the Mexican philosopher and his quest for universal knowledge and values are made visible, and a method is provided to study the life of knowledge and values in its concrete historicity and its political implications, without renouncing rational universality; method that, beyond the work of Zea, can be useful for the history of ideas and the philosophy of history in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cinta de Moebio\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"267-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cinta de Moebio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2020000300267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cinta de Moebio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2020000300267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文在梳理了蔡亚的一系列认识论和价值论立场和思想(历史现实主义、环境主义、透视主义、实用主义、政治途径、理论的理性自治、具体普遍性观念、依赖问题、辩证同化)的基础上,阐述了批判普遍主义的概念,并将它们联系在一起,发展了批判普遍主义的结构和动态性,描述了它的辩证法。这种方法是解释性的,在这个意义上,是对这位哲学家作品中显性和隐性内容的概念性阐述。通过批判普遍主义及其辩证法的概念,揭示了这位墨西哥哲学家的历史主义和实用主义政治批判及其对普遍知识和价值的追求之间的互补关系,并提供了一种在不放弃理性普遍性的情况下,在其具体的历史性及其政治含义中研究知识和价值生命的方法;除了Zea的工作之外,这种方法对思想史和一般的历史哲学也很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
El universalismo crítico de Leopoldo Zea. Una epistemología dialéctica para la historia de las ideas y la filosofía de la historia
Clarifying a set of epistemological and axiological stances and ideas of Zea (historicist realitivism, circumstantialism, perspectivism, pragmatism, political approach, rational autonomy of the theory, idea of concrete universality, dependency problem, dialectical assimilation), this paper elaborates the concept of critical universalism, which tie them up in an organized unit, and develops the structure and dynamism of this concept, describing its dialectic. The methodology is interpretative in the sense of a conceptual elaboration of the explicit and implicit contents in the work of this philosopher. Through the concept of critical universalism and its dialectics, the complementary relationship between the historicist and pragmatic-political criticism of the Mexican philosopher and his quest for universal knowledge and values are made visible, and a method is provided to study the life of knowledge and values in its concrete historicity and its political implications, without renouncing rational universality; method that, beyond the work of Zea, can be useful for the history of ideas and the philosophy of history in general.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cinta de Moebio
Cinta de Moebio PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Cinta de Moebio publishes scientific articles and essays on epistemology of social science. The editorial experience of the magazine indicates that some academics send articles of philosophy, but of issues that are not related to the social sciences, as well as academics who sent the results of their research or projects in the social sciences, but its focus is not epistemology, which also are geared out to the purpose of the journal. The journal, put it in some way, it is in the dialogue of philosophy with social science and, therefore, both domains must be present in the articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信