{"title":"数据挖掘中的数据问题","authors":"Albrecht Zimmermann","doi":"10.1145/2783702.2783706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computer science is essentially an applied or engineering science, creating tools. In Data Mining, those tools are supposed to help humans understand large amounts of data. In this position paper, I argue that for all the progress that has been made in Data Mining, in particular Pattern Mining, we are lacking insight into three key aspects: 1) How pattern mining algorithms perform quantitatively, 2) How to choose parameter settings, and 3) How to relate found patterns to the processes that generated the data. I illustrate the issue by surveying existing work in light of these concerns and pointing to the (relatively few) papers that have attempted to fill in the gaps. I argue further that progress regarding those questions is held back by a lack of data with varying, controlled properties, and that this lack is unlikely to be remedied by the ever increasing collection of real-life data. Instead, I am convinced that we will need to make a science of digital data generation, and use it to develop guidance to data practitioners.","PeriodicalId":90050,"journal":{"name":"SIGKDD explorations : newsletter of the Special Interest Group (SIG) on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining","volume":"21 1","pages":"38-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Data Problem in Data Mining\",\"authors\":\"Albrecht Zimmermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2783702.2783706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computer science is essentially an applied or engineering science, creating tools. In Data Mining, those tools are supposed to help humans understand large amounts of data. In this position paper, I argue that for all the progress that has been made in Data Mining, in particular Pattern Mining, we are lacking insight into three key aspects: 1) How pattern mining algorithms perform quantitatively, 2) How to choose parameter settings, and 3) How to relate found patterns to the processes that generated the data. I illustrate the issue by surveying existing work in light of these concerns and pointing to the (relatively few) papers that have attempted to fill in the gaps. I argue further that progress regarding those questions is held back by a lack of data with varying, controlled properties, and that this lack is unlikely to be remedied by the ever increasing collection of real-life data. Instead, I am convinced that we will need to make a science of digital data generation, and use it to develop guidance to data practitioners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGKDD explorations : newsletter of the Special Interest Group (SIG) on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"38-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGKDD explorations : newsletter of the Special Interest Group (SIG) on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2783702.2783706\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGKDD explorations : newsletter of the Special Interest Group (SIG) on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2783702.2783706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Computer science is essentially an applied or engineering science, creating tools. In Data Mining, those tools are supposed to help humans understand large amounts of data. In this position paper, I argue that for all the progress that has been made in Data Mining, in particular Pattern Mining, we are lacking insight into three key aspects: 1) How pattern mining algorithms perform quantitatively, 2) How to choose parameter settings, and 3) How to relate found patterns to the processes that generated the data. I illustrate the issue by surveying existing work in light of these concerns and pointing to the (relatively few) papers that have attempted to fill in the gaps. I argue further that progress regarding those questions is held back by a lack of data with varying, controlled properties, and that this lack is unlikely to be remedied by the ever increasing collection of real-life data. Instead, I am convinced that we will need to make a science of digital data generation, and use it to develop guidance to data practitioners.