{"title":"科塞莱克的《历史与政治视野》","authors":"Blake Ewing","doi":"10.3167/CHOC.2018.130204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political theorists, especially in the subfield of ideology studies, continue\nto draw insights from Begriffsgeschichte (conceptual history) to help them\nbetter analyze the morphology of political concepts over time. However,\nother aspects of Reinhart Koselleck’s work remain underutilized. This is\nespecially true of the connections between Begriffsgeschichte and his development\nof a theory of history (Historik), dealing with the broader intersection\nof language, structure, and the experience of time. This article\nfocuses on just one aspect of this intersection: on the potential relevance\nof Koselleck’s use of the concept of horizon to theorize a particular “horizonal\nmode” of the politics of time. After discussing some relevant features\nof the horizon metaphor, the article moves to reappraise Koselleck’s use of\nthe concept before elaborating and expanding on it to claim that Koselleck\nhelps to showcase the contestation of different temporal horizons as a core\nfeature of political thinking.","PeriodicalId":42746,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to the History of Concepts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Koselleck’s Historik and the Horizons of Politics\",\"authors\":\"Blake Ewing\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/CHOC.2018.130204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Political theorists, especially in the subfield of ideology studies, continue\\nto draw insights from Begriffsgeschichte (conceptual history) to help them\\nbetter analyze the morphology of political concepts over time. However,\\nother aspects of Reinhart Koselleck’s work remain underutilized. This is\\nespecially true of the connections between Begriffsgeschichte and his development\\nof a theory of history (Historik), dealing with the broader intersection\\nof language, structure, and the experience of time. This article\\nfocuses on just one aspect of this intersection: on the potential relevance\\nof Koselleck’s use of the concept of horizon to theorize a particular “horizonal\\nmode” of the politics of time. After discussing some relevant features\\nof the horizon metaphor, the article moves to reappraise Koselleck’s use of\\nthe concept before elaborating and expanding on it to claim that Koselleck\\nhelps to showcase the contestation of different temporal horizons as a core\\nfeature of political thinking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contributions to the History of Concepts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contributions to the History of Concepts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/CHOC.2018.130204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to the History of Concepts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/CHOC.2018.130204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Political theorists, especially in the subfield of ideology studies, continue
to draw insights from Begriffsgeschichte (conceptual history) to help them
better analyze the morphology of political concepts over time. However,
other aspects of Reinhart Koselleck’s work remain underutilized. This is
especially true of the connections between Begriffsgeschichte and his development
of a theory of history (Historik), dealing with the broader intersection
of language, structure, and the experience of time. This article
focuses on just one aspect of this intersection: on the potential relevance
of Koselleck’s use of the concept of horizon to theorize a particular “horizonal
mode” of the politics of time. After discussing some relevant features
of the horizon metaphor, the article moves to reappraise Koselleck’s use of
the concept before elaborating and expanding on it to claim that Koselleck
helps to showcase the contestation of different temporal horizons as a core
feature of political thinking.