多药耐药不动杆菌引起的呼吸机相关性肺炎两种治疗方法的比较:一项随机临床试验研究

F. Khorvash, Shoeleh Yaghoubi, Shadi Farsaei, B. Ataei, A. Hakamifard, F. Mohajeri, Mohsen Gudarzi
{"title":"多药耐药不动杆菌引起的呼吸机相关性肺炎两种治疗方法的比较:一项随机临床试验研究","authors":"F. Khorvash, Shoeleh Yaghoubi, Shadi Farsaei, B. Ataei, A. Hakamifard, F. Mohajeri, Mohsen Gudarzi","doi":"10.1080/15321819.2019.1696818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Management of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a puzzling issue for infectious disease specialist. The present clinical trial study was aimed to comparing the effects of injectable colistin plus nebulized colistin and injectable colistin plus nebulized tobramycin on management of patients with VAP due to multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter. VAP patients were randomly divided into two groups (n = 30/each): Group 1 – patients that received intravenous (IV) meropenem, injectable colistin plus nebulized colistin, as a routine treatment, and Group 2 – patients that received IV meropenem, injectable colistin plus nebulized tobramycin. A total of 14 days of therapeutic intervention are required for every case. Follow-up for subjects was performed at five time-points: days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 after intervention. Also, a mean of creatinine levels of patients was determined in five times. In the present study, the clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) was determined on the basis of points assigned for various clinically manifestations of VAP. Based on our statistical analysis, there was no significant difference between CPIS and creatinine level in both Groups 1 and 2 (p > .05). CPIS and other clinical investigation appeared effectiveness of the treatment with injected colistin plus nebulized tobramycin; on the other hand, the results of present clinical trial showed that aforementioned therapeutic approach can be used as an alternative treatment for the management of infection in VAP patients.","PeriodicalId":15987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two therapeutic approaches for the management of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter: a randomized clinical trial study\",\"authors\":\"F. Khorvash, Shoeleh Yaghoubi, Shadi Farsaei, B. Ataei, A. Hakamifard, F. Mohajeri, Mohsen Gudarzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15321819.2019.1696818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Management of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a puzzling issue for infectious disease specialist. The present clinical trial study was aimed to comparing the effects of injectable colistin plus nebulized colistin and injectable colistin plus nebulized tobramycin on management of patients with VAP due to multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter. VAP patients were randomly divided into two groups (n = 30/each): Group 1 – patients that received intravenous (IV) meropenem, injectable colistin plus nebulized colistin, as a routine treatment, and Group 2 – patients that received IV meropenem, injectable colistin plus nebulized tobramycin. A total of 14 days of therapeutic intervention are required for every case. Follow-up for subjects was performed at five time-points: days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 after intervention. Also, a mean of creatinine levels of patients was determined in five times. In the present study, the clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) was determined on the basis of points assigned for various clinically manifestations of VAP. Based on our statistical analysis, there was no significant difference between CPIS and creatinine level in both Groups 1 and 2 (p > .05). CPIS and other clinical investigation appeared effectiveness of the treatment with injected colistin plus nebulized tobramycin; on the other hand, the results of present clinical trial showed that aforementioned therapeutic approach can be used as an alternative treatment for the management of infection in VAP patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15321819.2019.1696818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15321819.2019.1696818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的治疗一直是困扰传染病专家的难题。本临床试验旨在比较注射粘菌素加雾化治疗与注射粘菌素加雾化妥布霉素治疗多药耐药不动杆菌所致VAP的疗效。将VAP患者随机分为两组(每组30例):第1组常规给予静脉注射美罗培南、注射黏菌素加雾化黏菌素治疗;第2组静脉注射美罗培南、注射黏菌素加雾化妥布霉素治疗。每个病例总共需要14天的治疗干预。在干预后的第1天、第3天、第5天、第7天和第14天对受试者进行随访。同时,测定5次患者肌酐水平的平均值。在本研究中,临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)是根据VAP的各种临床表现的评分来确定的。经统计学分析,1、2组CPIS与肌酐水平比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。CPIS等临床调查显示注射粘菌素加雾化妥布霉素治疗的有效性;另一方面,本临床试验结果表明,上述治疗方法可以作为VAP患者感染管理的替代治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of two therapeutic approaches for the management of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter: a randomized clinical trial study
ABSTRACT Management of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a puzzling issue for infectious disease specialist. The present clinical trial study was aimed to comparing the effects of injectable colistin plus nebulized colistin and injectable colistin plus nebulized tobramycin on management of patients with VAP due to multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter. VAP patients were randomly divided into two groups (n = 30/each): Group 1 – patients that received intravenous (IV) meropenem, injectable colistin plus nebulized colistin, as a routine treatment, and Group 2 – patients that received IV meropenem, injectable colistin plus nebulized tobramycin. A total of 14 days of therapeutic intervention are required for every case. Follow-up for subjects was performed at five time-points: days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 after intervention. Also, a mean of creatinine levels of patients was determined in five times. In the present study, the clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) was determined on the basis of points assigned for various clinically manifestations of VAP. Based on our statistical analysis, there was no significant difference between CPIS and creatinine level in both Groups 1 and 2 (p > .05). CPIS and other clinical investigation appeared effectiveness of the treatment with injected colistin plus nebulized tobramycin; on the other hand, the results of present clinical trial showed that aforementioned therapeutic approach can be used as an alternative treatment for the management of infection in VAP patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信