设定受益养老金计划入职年龄正常与预计单位抵扣法的比较

A. Angkasa, Dwi Wahyu Puji Lestari, S. Devila
{"title":"设定受益养老金计划入职年龄正常与预计单位抵扣法的比较","authors":"A. Angkasa, Dwi Wahyu Puji Lestari, S. Devila","doi":"10.1063/5.0059248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this modern age, the quality of life of a person is always improving. This leads to longer lifespans, hence resulting in a longer pension period for that individual. Pension programs are therefore needed more than ever so that a person can receive a benefit after they retire and maintain the same quality of life they had before they retired. The topic of this paper is comparing the entry age normal and projected unit credit method for funding of a defined benefit pension plan. The entry age normal method uses the concept of projecting the benefit that will be earned at the end of an employee’s career. The projected unit credit method uses the concept of benefits accrued to the date of normal cost determination. From the data simulation it can be concluded that the projected unit credit method results in a smaller normal cost compared to the entry age normal method and the projected unit credit method results in a greater actuarial liability compared to the entry age normal method.","PeriodicalId":20561,"journal":{"name":"PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CURRENT PROGRESS IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCES 2020 (ISCPMS 2020)","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of entry age normal and projected unit credit method for funding of defined benefit pension plan\",\"authors\":\"A. Angkasa, Dwi Wahyu Puji Lestari, S. Devila\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/5.0059248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this modern age, the quality of life of a person is always improving. This leads to longer lifespans, hence resulting in a longer pension period for that individual. Pension programs are therefore needed more than ever so that a person can receive a benefit after they retire and maintain the same quality of life they had before they retired. The topic of this paper is comparing the entry age normal and projected unit credit method for funding of a defined benefit pension plan. The entry age normal method uses the concept of projecting the benefit that will be earned at the end of an employee’s career. The projected unit credit method uses the concept of benefits accrued to the date of normal cost determination. From the data simulation it can be concluded that the projected unit credit method results in a smaller normal cost compared to the entry age normal method and the projected unit credit method results in a greater actuarial liability compared to the entry age normal method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CURRENT PROGRESS IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCES 2020 (ISCPMS 2020)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CURRENT PROGRESS IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCES 2020 (ISCPMS 2020)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0059248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CURRENT PROGRESS IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCES 2020 (ISCPMS 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0059248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这个现代时代,一个人的生活质量总是在提高。这导致寿命延长,从而导致个人的养老金期限延长。因此,现在比以往任何时候都更需要养老金计划,这样人们才能在退休后获得福利,并保持退休前的生活质量。本文的课题是比较设定受益型养老金计划的入职年龄正常法和预计单位信用法。入职年龄正常方法使用的概念是预测员工在职业生涯结束时将获得的福利。预计单位信用法使用的是到确定正常成本之日为止应计收益的概念。从数据模拟可以得出结论,与入职年龄正常法相比,预计单位信用法产生的正常成本较小,而与入职年龄正常法相比,预计单位信用法产生的精算责任更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of entry age normal and projected unit credit method for funding of defined benefit pension plan
In this modern age, the quality of life of a person is always improving. This leads to longer lifespans, hence resulting in a longer pension period for that individual. Pension programs are therefore needed more than ever so that a person can receive a benefit after they retire and maintain the same quality of life they had before they retired. The topic of this paper is comparing the entry age normal and projected unit credit method for funding of a defined benefit pension plan. The entry age normal method uses the concept of projecting the benefit that will be earned at the end of an employee’s career. The projected unit credit method uses the concept of benefits accrued to the date of normal cost determination. From the data simulation it can be concluded that the projected unit credit method results in a smaller normal cost compared to the entry age normal method and the projected unit credit method results in a greater actuarial liability compared to the entry age normal method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信