应用井眼加固技术推进深水高温高压钻井的前沿——一种实用方法

Sultan Alimuddin, C. Aldea, J. Manson, Kantaphon Temaismithi
{"title":"应用井眼加固技术推进深水高温高压钻井的前沿——一种实用方法","authors":"Sultan Alimuddin, C. Aldea, J. Manson, Kantaphon Temaismithi","doi":"10.2118/205550-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents a comprehensive laboratory and field study, discussing the development, formulation, and application of a wellbore strengthening mechanism, for strengthening weak formations while drilling in a deepwater high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) well environment. The use of this technology has potential to eliminate nonproductive time (NPT) related to downhole losses, along with extending the drillability of sections and eliminating additional casing strings, during exploratory drilling.\n During the planning phase of a sequence of deepwater and HP/HT exploration wells, the potential high-pressure case scenario drove the planned and contingency well casing designs. This led to an extensive casing program with a 16-in. sub mudline hanger casing string added to the base design, as well as the normal 36-in. conductor, 20-in. surface casing, 13 ⅜-in. intermediate casing, and 9 ⅝-in. casing, which would enable reaching total depth (TD) within a planned 8 ½-in. hole. The realistic offset well driven by the high-pressure case also required two further contingency liner strings (11 ¾ in. and 7 in.), to be included in the well design. A key enabler for the sequence of wells was that the semisubmersible rig was upgraded to include a managed pressure drilling (MPD) below tension ring (BTR) arrangement. This was enhanced by the MPD well control system and associated risk assessment, allowing working to reduced acceptable kick tolerance limits. In addition to the outlined base and contingency plans, wellbore strengthening was also to be available, as an additional contingency application, to reach TD objectives.\n Thus, extensive laboratory tests were performed for wellbore strengthening design, using proprietary software, along with past established practices. Subsequent to laboratory testing and the optimal formulation, a detailed wellbore strengthening program was prepared and included in the drilling program, for potential use at any point while drilling ahead. On one well, after cementing of 13 ⅜-in. casing and performing a leakoff test (LOT), it was found that the value was insufficient for drilling through the entire planned section. A contingency 11 ¾-in. liner was being enabled before it was decided to pump the wellbore strengthening pill and strengthen the casing shoe. The pill application gave sufficient increased formation strength, leading to the well section being successfully drilled and cased with no losses, even though the high-pressure well scenario was actually encountered. This solution eliminated the time and cost implication and considerable operational challenges of the 11 ¾-in. contingency liner.\n This paper presents the study of conceptualizing the wellbore strengthening mechanism and implementing this customized solution in the field. A detailed analysis is also done to identify the optimal products, compatibility with drilling fluid, formation and existing chemical permit, and cost-effectiveness and savings using wellbore strengthening practice. The paper also discusses the comprehensive pit management program and required treatment plan while drilling.","PeriodicalId":11052,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pushing the Frontier in Deepwater HP/HT Drilling by Application of Wellbore Strengthening—A Practical Approach\",\"authors\":\"Sultan Alimuddin, C. Aldea, J. Manson, Kantaphon Temaismithi\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/205550-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper presents a comprehensive laboratory and field study, discussing the development, formulation, and application of a wellbore strengthening mechanism, for strengthening weak formations while drilling in a deepwater high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) well environment. The use of this technology has potential to eliminate nonproductive time (NPT) related to downhole losses, along with extending the drillability of sections and eliminating additional casing strings, during exploratory drilling.\\n During the planning phase of a sequence of deepwater and HP/HT exploration wells, the potential high-pressure case scenario drove the planned and contingency well casing designs. This led to an extensive casing program with a 16-in. sub mudline hanger casing string added to the base design, as well as the normal 36-in. conductor, 20-in. surface casing, 13 ⅜-in. intermediate casing, and 9 ⅝-in. casing, which would enable reaching total depth (TD) within a planned 8 ½-in. hole. The realistic offset well driven by the high-pressure case also required two further contingency liner strings (11 ¾ in. and 7 in.), to be included in the well design. A key enabler for the sequence of wells was that the semisubmersible rig was upgraded to include a managed pressure drilling (MPD) below tension ring (BTR) arrangement. This was enhanced by the MPD well control system and associated risk assessment, allowing working to reduced acceptable kick tolerance limits. In addition to the outlined base and contingency plans, wellbore strengthening was also to be available, as an additional contingency application, to reach TD objectives.\\n Thus, extensive laboratory tests were performed for wellbore strengthening design, using proprietary software, along with past established practices. Subsequent to laboratory testing and the optimal formulation, a detailed wellbore strengthening program was prepared and included in the drilling program, for potential use at any point while drilling ahead. On one well, after cementing of 13 ⅜-in. casing and performing a leakoff test (LOT), it was found that the value was insufficient for drilling through the entire planned section. A contingency 11 ¾-in. liner was being enabled before it was decided to pump the wellbore strengthening pill and strengthen the casing shoe. The pill application gave sufficient increased formation strength, leading to the well section being successfully drilled and cased with no losses, even though the high-pressure well scenario was actually encountered. This solution eliminated the time and cost implication and considerable operational challenges of the 11 ¾-in. contingency liner.\\n This paper presents the study of conceptualizing the wellbore strengthening mechanism and implementing this customized solution in the field. A detailed analysis is also done to identify the optimal products, compatibility with drilling fluid, formation and existing chemical permit, and cost-effectiveness and savings using wellbore strengthening practice. The paper also discusses the comprehensive pit management program and required treatment plan while drilling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/205550-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/205550-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了一项全面的实验室和现场研究,讨论了在深水高压/高温(HP/HT)井环境中钻井时加强薄弱地层的井筒强化机制的开发、配方和应用。在勘探钻井过程中,使用该技术有可能消除与井下损失相关的非生产时间(NPT),同时延长分段的可钻性,并消除额外的套管柱。在一系列深水和高温高压探井的规划阶段,潜在的高压情况推动了计划的和应急的套管设计。这导致了大量的16-in套管项目。在基础设计中添加了下泥浆管线悬挂器套管管柱,以及普通的36-in套管。导体,完全符合标准。表面套管,13 8 / in。中间套管,9⅝英寸管柱。该套管能够在计划的8 - 1 / 2英寸内到达总深度(TD)。洞。高压套管驱动的实际邻井还需要另外两根应急尾管(11 - 3 / 4in)。和7英寸),将包括在井设计中。井序列的一个关键推动因素是,半潜式钻井平台进行了升级,在张力环(BTR)下安装了控压钻井(MPD)。MPD井控系统和相关的风险评估增强了这一点,从而降低了可接受的井涌容限。除了概述的基础和应急计划外,井眼加固也可以作为额外的应急应用,以达到TD目标。因此,使用专有软件以及过去的既定实践,对井眼加固设计进行了大量的实验室测试。在实验室测试和优化配方之后,制定了详细的井筒强化方案,并将其纳入钻井方案,以便在钻井过程中随时使用。在一口井上,13 / 8 -in固井后。然后进行了泄漏测试(LOT),结果发现该数值不足以钻透整个计划井段。11 - 3 / 4英寸。在决定泵入井筒强化丸并加固套管鞋之前,尾管已经启用。即使实际遇到高压井的情况,也能充分提高地层强度,成功完成井段的钻井和套管井作业,没有损失。该解决方案消除了11 - 3 / 4 -in井眼的时间和成本问题以及相当大的操作挑战。应急班轮。本文介绍了对井筒强化机理的概念化研究,并在现场实施了该定制解决方案。此外,还进行了详细的分析,以确定最佳产品,与钻井液、地层和现有化学品的相容性,以及使用井筒加固实践的成本效益和节省。文中还讨论了矿井综合管理方案和随钻所需的处理方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pushing the Frontier in Deepwater HP/HT Drilling by Application of Wellbore Strengthening—A Practical Approach
This paper presents a comprehensive laboratory and field study, discussing the development, formulation, and application of a wellbore strengthening mechanism, for strengthening weak formations while drilling in a deepwater high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) well environment. The use of this technology has potential to eliminate nonproductive time (NPT) related to downhole losses, along with extending the drillability of sections and eliminating additional casing strings, during exploratory drilling. During the planning phase of a sequence of deepwater and HP/HT exploration wells, the potential high-pressure case scenario drove the planned and contingency well casing designs. This led to an extensive casing program with a 16-in. sub mudline hanger casing string added to the base design, as well as the normal 36-in. conductor, 20-in. surface casing, 13 ⅜-in. intermediate casing, and 9 ⅝-in. casing, which would enable reaching total depth (TD) within a planned 8 ½-in. hole. The realistic offset well driven by the high-pressure case also required two further contingency liner strings (11 ¾ in. and 7 in.), to be included in the well design. A key enabler for the sequence of wells was that the semisubmersible rig was upgraded to include a managed pressure drilling (MPD) below tension ring (BTR) arrangement. This was enhanced by the MPD well control system and associated risk assessment, allowing working to reduced acceptable kick tolerance limits. In addition to the outlined base and contingency plans, wellbore strengthening was also to be available, as an additional contingency application, to reach TD objectives. Thus, extensive laboratory tests were performed for wellbore strengthening design, using proprietary software, along with past established practices. Subsequent to laboratory testing and the optimal formulation, a detailed wellbore strengthening program was prepared and included in the drilling program, for potential use at any point while drilling ahead. On one well, after cementing of 13 ⅜-in. casing and performing a leakoff test (LOT), it was found that the value was insufficient for drilling through the entire planned section. A contingency 11 ¾-in. liner was being enabled before it was decided to pump the wellbore strengthening pill and strengthen the casing shoe. The pill application gave sufficient increased formation strength, leading to the well section being successfully drilled and cased with no losses, even though the high-pressure well scenario was actually encountered. This solution eliminated the time and cost implication and considerable operational challenges of the 11 ¾-in. contingency liner. This paper presents the study of conceptualizing the wellbore strengthening mechanism and implementing this customized solution in the field. A detailed analysis is also done to identify the optimal products, compatibility with drilling fluid, formation and existing chemical permit, and cost-effectiveness and savings using wellbore strengthening practice. The paper also discusses the comprehensive pit management program and required treatment plan while drilling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信