超越存在

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Studia Poliana Pub Date : 2018-05-23 DOI:10.15581/013.26118
J. Posada
{"title":"超越存在","authors":"J. Posada","doi":"10.15581/013.26118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In contrast to Heidegger's claim which establishes the end of metaphysics, it is generally upheld that Polo's proposal regrding the expansion -through anthropology- of the metaphysic's own transcendental reach permits supersedence without lessening perennity. Thus widening requires not only a thematical explanation but also a methodical one, upon which the congruency both of metaphysics and of anthropology, as different types of philosophy for the transcendental, can be established. This method springs forth from the detection of the limiting character that revolves around mental presence. It is actuality understood as the least intellectual act in human knowledge, and deserts the intellective modality by means of superior intellectual acts.","PeriodicalId":37838,"journal":{"name":"Studia Poliana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trascender la presencia\",\"authors\":\"J. Posada\",\"doi\":\"10.15581/013.26118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In contrast to Heidegger's claim which establishes the end of metaphysics, it is generally upheld that Polo's proposal regrding the expansion -through anthropology- of the metaphysic's own transcendental reach permits supersedence without lessening perennity. Thus widening requires not only a thematical explanation but also a methodical one, upon which the congruency both of metaphysics and of anthropology, as different types of philosophy for the transcendental, can be established. This method springs forth from the detection of the limiting character that revolves around mental presence. It is actuality understood as the least intellectual act in human knowledge, and deserts the intellective modality by means of superior intellectual acts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Poliana\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Poliana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15581/013.26118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Poliana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15581/013.26118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

与海德格尔确立了形而上学的终结的主张相反,人们普遍认为,波罗关于形而上学自身先验范围的扩展的建议——通过人类学——允许超越而不减少持久性。因此,拓宽不仅需要一个主题的解释,而且需要一个系统的解释,在此基础上,形而上学和人类学作为不同类型的先验哲学的一致性可以建立起来。这种方法源于对围绕精神存在的限制性特征的检测。它实际上被理解为人类知识中最不理智的行为,并通过更高级的理智行为抛弃了理智形态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trascender la presencia
In contrast to Heidegger's claim which establishes the end of metaphysics, it is generally upheld that Polo's proposal regrding the expansion -through anthropology- of the metaphysic's own transcendental reach permits supersedence without lessening perennity. Thus widening requires not only a thematical explanation but also a methodical one, upon which the congruency both of metaphysics and of anthropology, as different types of philosophy for the transcendental, can be established. This method springs forth from the detection of the limiting character that revolves around mental presence. It is actuality understood as the least intellectual act in human knowledge, and deserts the intellective modality by means of superior intellectual acts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Poliana
Studia Poliana Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Studia Poliana is a journal of the Departament of Philosophy of the University of Navarra. It is annually published, each february. The journal aims to invite researchers to cooperate towards the big topics of contemporary philosophy. Studia Poliana focusses on the philosophical proposal of Leonardo Polo. Our principal aim is to publish articles that are models of interdisciplinary work and scientific accuracy allowing the readers to keep abreast of the central issues and problems of anthropology, metaphysicis, and theory of knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信