高校科研队伍与科学院校的资源能力:发展战略与管理问题

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
G. Zborovsky, E. Kemmet
{"title":"高校科研队伍与科学院校的资源能力:发展战略与管理问题","authors":"G. Zborovsky, E. Kemmet","doi":"10.22394/2304-3369-2023-3-46-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Introduction. One of the urgent problems of modern higher education is the desire of universities to improve their resource base. It appears in the form of various manifestations of a professional-pedagogical, research, publication, communication, temporal and other nature. One of the most important university resources are research teams (SC) and research schools (NS). They became the subject of the author's analysis in the proposed article. It gives a description of the common and different between them, shows the resources that take place in each of the two named scientific structures. It is proved that the main subject of both SC and NS is the social and professional community of scientific and pedagogical workers (SPR). The article presents its author's understanding. Materials and methods. The basis of the empirical base of the article was, firstly, statistical materials that characterize the higher education of the Ural Federal District and the faculty of its universities, and secondly, the materials of interviews conducted among more than 30 representatives of this professional community on strategies for managing them. Results. The main results obtained in the course of the study are as follows. 1. Identification of the key characteristics of the SPD resources actively participating in NC and NS: traditions of scientific schools; the authority of the head (leader); opportunities to win joint grants; continuity of generations. 2. Identification of the specifics of the resources of NC and NS, which make it possible to discover common and different things in the activities of the SPD that are part of their structure. 3. Understanding the role of research and publication resources as a factor in revitalizing the activities of NCs and NSs. 4. Characteristics of the interpretations of NC and NS under the conditions of formalization of the resource capacity of each of the scientific structures. Discussion. Discussion of the strategy for the development and management of NC and NS resources: 1. The excessively high level of exploitation of the research resource of the CS by management structures in the structures of CS and NS. 2. Imitation of scientific publicity and activity of the NDP within the framework of the NC and NS. 3. Absolutization of the physical indicators of the professional development of the scientific and technical staff in the structures of the NC and NSH. 4. Allocation of problematic resources of NC and NS under the new conditions of university management.","PeriodicalId":40270,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Management Issues","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resource capacity of university research teams and scientific schools: problems of development strategy and management\",\"authors\":\"G. Zborovsky, E. Kemmet\",\"doi\":\"10.22394/2304-3369-2023-3-46-58\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Introduction. One of the urgent problems of modern higher education is the desire of universities to improve their resource base. It appears in the form of various manifestations of a professional-pedagogical, research, publication, communication, temporal and other nature. One of the most important university resources are research teams (SC) and research schools (NS). They became the subject of the author's analysis in the proposed article. It gives a description of the common and different between them, shows the resources that take place in each of the two named scientific structures. It is proved that the main subject of both SC and NS is the social and professional community of scientific and pedagogical workers (SPR). The article presents its author's understanding. Materials and methods. The basis of the empirical base of the article was, firstly, statistical materials that characterize the higher education of the Ural Federal District and the faculty of its universities, and secondly, the materials of interviews conducted among more than 30 representatives of this professional community on strategies for managing them. Results. The main results obtained in the course of the study are as follows. 1. Identification of the key characteristics of the SPD resources actively participating in NC and NS: traditions of scientific schools; the authority of the head (leader); opportunities to win joint grants; continuity of generations. 2. Identification of the specifics of the resources of NC and NS, which make it possible to discover common and different things in the activities of the SPD that are part of their structure. 3. Understanding the role of research and publication resources as a factor in revitalizing the activities of NCs and NSs. 4. Characteristics of the interpretations of NC and NS under the conditions of formalization of the resource capacity of each of the scientific structures. Discussion. Discussion of the strategy for the development and management of NC and NS resources: 1. The excessively high level of exploitation of the research resource of the CS by management structures in the structures of CS and NS. 2. Imitation of scientific publicity and activity of the NDP within the framework of the NC and NS. 3. Absolutization of the physical indicators of the professional development of the scientific and technical staff in the structures of the NC and NSH. 4. Allocation of problematic resources of NC and NS under the new conditions of university management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Management Issues\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Management Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2023-3-46-58\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Management Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/2304-3369-2023-3-46-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:介绍。高校提高资源基础的愿望是现代高等教育亟待解决的问题之一。它以各种形式表现出来,具有专业性——教学性、研究性、出版性、传播性、时代性和其他性质。研究团队(SC)和研究学院(NS)是大学最重要的资源之一。他们成为作者在提议的文章中分析的主题。它给出了它们之间的共同之处和不同之处的描述,显示了两种命名的科学结构中发生的资源。事实证明,科学教育工作者和社会教育工作者的主体都是社会和专业群体。本文阐述了作者的理解。材料和方法。本文的实证基础首先是乌拉尔联邦区高等教育及其大学教师的统计资料,其次是对该专业社区30多名代表进行的关于管理策略的访谈资料。结果。在研究过程中获得的主要结果如下:1. 社民党资源积极参与NC和NS的关键特征识别:科学学派的传统领导(领导)的权威;获得联合资助的机会;世代的延续。2. 识别NC和NS资源的细节,这使得有可能发现SPD活动中作为其结构一部分的共同和不同的东西。3.了解研究和出版资源在振兴国家中心和国家情报机构活动方面的作用。4. 在每种科学结构的资源能力形式化的条件下,NC和NS的解释特征。讨论。NC、NS资源开发与管理策略探讨:在CS和NS结构中,管理机构对CS研究资源的开发程度过高。2. 在国家科学委员会和国家科学委员会的框架内,模仿国家科学委员会的科学宣传和活动。3.在NC和NSH的结构中,科学技术人员专业发展的物理指标绝对化。4. 新形势下高校管理中存在问题的资源配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resource capacity of university research teams and scientific schools: problems of development strategy and management
: Introduction. One of the urgent problems of modern higher education is the desire of universities to improve their resource base. It appears in the form of various manifestations of a professional-pedagogical, research, publication, communication, temporal and other nature. One of the most important university resources are research teams (SC) and research schools (NS). They became the subject of the author's analysis in the proposed article. It gives a description of the common and different between them, shows the resources that take place in each of the two named scientific structures. It is proved that the main subject of both SC and NS is the social and professional community of scientific and pedagogical workers (SPR). The article presents its author's understanding. Materials and methods. The basis of the empirical base of the article was, firstly, statistical materials that characterize the higher education of the Ural Federal District and the faculty of its universities, and secondly, the materials of interviews conducted among more than 30 representatives of this professional community on strategies for managing them. Results. The main results obtained in the course of the study are as follows. 1. Identification of the key characteristics of the SPD resources actively participating in NC and NS: traditions of scientific schools; the authority of the head (leader); opportunities to win joint grants; continuity of generations. 2. Identification of the specifics of the resources of NC and NS, which make it possible to discover common and different things in the activities of the SPD that are part of their structure. 3. Understanding the role of research and publication resources as a factor in revitalizing the activities of NCs and NSs. 4. Characteristics of the interpretations of NC and NS under the conditions of formalization of the resource capacity of each of the scientific structures. Discussion. Discussion of the strategy for the development and management of NC and NS resources: 1. The excessively high level of exploitation of the research resource of the CS by management structures in the structures of CS and NS. 2. Imitation of scientific publicity and activity of the NDP within the framework of the NC and NS. 3. Absolutization of the physical indicators of the professional development of the scientific and technical staff in the structures of the NC and NSH. 4. Allocation of problematic resources of NC and NS under the new conditions of university management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Management Issues
Clinical Management Issues MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Management Issues is an open access, peer-reviewed journal published by SEEd Medical Publishers (online ISSN = 2283-3137). The aim of the published case reports is to expand medical knowledge, allowing a better explanation of the practical application of a clinical guideline, or including an up-to-date review of medical knowledge in that field, or helping doctors to make better decisions in a “grey area”, or explaining how to manage a disease with an integrated approach between different specialists involved. Clinical Management Issues also publishes unusual case reports (i.e. unusual side effects or adverse interactions involving medications, unexpected or unusual presentations of a disease, etc.), articles on clinical management of a disease, case series, editorials, and brief reports. Acceptance rate of submitted articles is about 90%. Content is subject to peer-review and is editorially independent. This journal provides immediate open access to all of its articles (both HTML and PDF versions). Authors are asked to state any professional and financial situations that might be perceived as causing a conflict of interest with respect to integrity of content. The Declaration of Financial Competing Interests, that should be filled, signed and sent to the Publisher, is downloadable here.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信