金融危机后南亚有限公司治理标准分析——以印度和马来西亚为例

{"title":"金融危机后南亚有限公司治理标准分析——以印度和马来西亚为例","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jhss.03.01.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the recent global crisis, corporate scandals and bankruptcy in US and Europe, there is some certain evidence on weak\ncorporate governance, risk management and audit system. The 2009 India Code of Corporate Governance also revealed that\nduring the crisis time, there are certain weaknesses although corporate structure is fairly durable. Hence, this paper chooses a\ndifferent analytical approach and among its aims is to give some systematic opinions.\nFirst, it classifies limited South Asian representative corporate governance (CG) standards into each group: India and Malaysia\nlatest CG principles covered, so-called relative good CG group, while it uses ACCA and OECD and ICGN principles as reference.\nSecond, it , through analysis, identifies differences and advantages between above set of standards which are and have been used\nas reference principles for many relevant organizations.\nThird, it establishes a selected comparative set of standards for South Asian representative corporate governance system in\naccordance to international standards.\nLast but not least, this paper covers some ideas and policy suggestions.","PeriodicalId":32779,"journal":{"name":"Mizoram University Journal of Humanities Social Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Analysis of Limited South Asian Corporate Governance Standards after\\nFinancial Crisis-Cases in India and Malaysia\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/jhss.03.01.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After the recent global crisis, corporate scandals and bankruptcy in US and Europe, there is some certain evidence on weak\\ncorporate governance, risk management and audit system. The 2009 India Code of Corporate Governance also revealed that\\nduring the crisis time, there are certain weaknesses although corporate structure is fairly durable. Hence, this paper chooses a\\ndifferent analytical approach and among its aims is to give some systematic opinions.\\nFirst, it classifies limited South Asian representative corporate governance (CG) standards into each group: India and Malaysia\\nlatest CG principles covered, so-called relative good CG group, while it uses ACCA and OECD and ICGN principles as reference.\\nSecond, it , through analysis, identifies differences and advantages between above set of standards which are and have been used\\nas reference principles for many relevant organizations.\\nThird, it establishes a selected comparative set of standards for South Asian representative corporate governance system in\\naccordance to international standards.\\nLast but not least, this paper covers some ideas and policy suggestions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mizoram University Journal of Humanities Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mizoram University Journal of Humanities Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/jhss.03.01.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mizoram University Journal of Humanities Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jhss.03.01.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在最近的全球金融危机之后,美国和欧洲的公司丑闻和破产,证明了公司治理,风险管理和审计制度的薄弱。2009年印度公司治理准则也显示,在危机时期,尽管公司结构相当持久,但仍存在某些弱点。因此,本文选择了一种不同的分析方法,其目的之一是给出一些系统的意见。首先,它将有限的南亚代表性公司治理(CG)标准分为每一组:印度和马来西亚最新的CG原则所涵盖的,所谓的相对较好的CG组,而它使用ACCA和经合组织和ICGN原则作为参考。其次,通过分析,找出上述标准之间的差异和优势,这些标准是并已被许多相关组织用作参考原则。第三,根据国际标准,建立了一套精选的南亚代表性公司治理体系比较标准。最后,本文提出了一些思路和政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Analysis of Limited South Asian Corporate Governance Standards after Financial Crisis-Cases in India and Malaysia
After the recent global crisis, corporate scandals and bankruptcy in US and Europe, there is some certain evidence on weak corporate governance, risk management and audit system. The 2009 India Code of Corporate Governance also revealed that during the crisis time, there are certain weaknesses although corporate structure is fairly durable. Hence, this paper chooses a different analytical approach and among its aims is to give some systematic opinions. First, it classifies limited South Asian representative corporate governance (CG) standards into each group: India and Malaysia latest CG principles covered, so-called relative good CG group, while it uses ACCA and OECD and ICGN principles as reference. Second, it , through analysis, identifies differences and advantages between above set of standards which are and have been used as reference principles for many relevant organizations. Third, it establishes a selected comparative set of standards for South Asian representative corporate governance system in accordance to international standards. Last but not least, this paper covers some ideas and policy suggestions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信