多布斯之后的全球再生治理

IF 2.4 4区历史学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Current History Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1525/curh.2023.122.840.22

L. Morgan

{"title":"多布斯之后的全球再生治理","authors":"L. Morgan","doi":"10.1525/curh.2023.122.840.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2022 US Supreme Court decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health overturned the constitutional right to abortion, raising questions about the international implications of the ruling. The Dobbs decision reveals a growing rift in global reproductive governance between countries that rely on international human rights standards and those that do not. The global momentum is currently with the human rights contingent, but the Dobbs ruling reflects the logic of a global antiabortion coalition that would like each country to decide its own life and family laws, without interference from multilateral agencies, based on its own constitution, history, and traditions.","PeriodicalId":45614,"journal":{"name":"Current History","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Reproductive Governance after Dobbs\",\"authors\":\"L. Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/curh.2023.122.840.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2022 US Supreme Court decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health overturned the constitutional right to abortion, raising questions about the international implications of the ruling. The Dobbs decision reveals a growing rift in global reproductive governance between countries that rely on international human rights standards and those that do not. The global momentum is currently with the human rights contingent, but the Dobbs ruling reflects the logic of a global antiabortion coalition that would like each country to decide its own life and family laws, without interference from multilateral agencies, based on its own constitution, history, and traditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current History\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2023.122.840.22\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2023.122.840.22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

2022年，美国最高法院对“多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康”的判决推翻了堕胎的宪法权利，引发了对该裁决的国际影响的质疑。多布斯案的裁决表明，依赖国际人权标准的国家与不依赖国际人权标准的国家之间，在全球生殖管理方面的分歧越来越大。目前，全球的势头是在人权方面，但多布斯案的裁决反映了全球反堕胎联盟的逻辑，即希望每个国家根据自己的宪法、历史和传统，在不受多边机构干涉的情况下，决定自己的生活和家庭法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Global Reproductive Governance after Dobbs

The 2022 US Supreme Court decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health overturned the constitutional right to abortion, raising questions about the international implications of the ruling. The Dobbs decision reveals a growing rift in global reproductive governance between countries that rely on international human rights standards and those that do not. The global momentum is currently with the human rights contingent, but the Dobbs ruling reflects the logic of a global antiabortion coalition that would like each country to decide its own life and family laws, without interference from multilateral agencies, based on its own constitution, history, and traditions.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Current History Multiple-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Current History enjoys a unique place among America"s most distinguished periodicals.The oldest US publication devoted exclusively to world affairs, Current History was founded by The New York Times in 1914 to provide detailed coverage of what was then known as the Great War. As a privately owned publication, Current History has continued a long tradition of groundbreaking coverage, providing a forum for leading scholars and specialists to analyze events and trends in every region of a rapidly changing world.