{"title":"在知情同意文件上获得正确的签名","authors":"Lindsay McNair, Patience Stevens, Glenn Veit","doi":"10.14524/CR-16-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obtaining informed consent in clinical research is straightforward when the study population includes capable adults, but becomes complex when certain participants require either legally authorized representatives (LARs) or impartial witnesses. This article discusses situations in which LARs and witnesses should participate in the consent process, the regulatory basis of why these issues are scrutinized so closely, and how the study documents can facilitate protocol review.","PeriodicalId":90809,"journal":{"name":"Clinical researcher (Alexandria, Va.)","volume":"10 1","pages":"22-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Getting the Right Signatures on Informed Consent Documents\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay McNair, Patience Stevens, Glenn Veit\",\"doi\":\"10.14524/CR-16-0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Obtaining informed consent in clinical research is straightforward when the study population includes capable adults, but becomes complex when certain participants require either legally authorized representatives (LARs) or impartial witnesses. This article discusses situations in which LARs and witnesses should participate in the consent process, the regulatory basis of why these issues are scrutinized so closely, and how the study documents can facilitate protocol review.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical researcher (Alexandria, Va.)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"22-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical researcher (Alexandria, Va.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14524/CR-16-0018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical researcher (Alexandria, Va.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14524/CR-16-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Getting the Right Signatures on Informed Consent Documents
Obtaining informed consent in clinical research is straightforward when the study population includes capable adults, but becomes complex when certain participants require either legally authorized representatives (LARs) or impartial witnesses. This article discusses situations in which LARs and witnesses should participate in the consent process, the regulatory basis of why these issues are scrutinized so closely, and how the study documents can facilitate protocol review.