论手语中的隐喻概念

IF 0.4 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Sign Language & Linguistics Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1075/SLL.00001.KIM

V. Kimmelman, M. Kyuseva, Yana Lomakina, Daria Perova

{"title":"论手语中的隐喻概念","authors":"V. Kimmelman, M. Kyuseva, Yana Lomakina, Daria Perova","doi":"10.1075/SLL.00001.KIM","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metaphors in sign languages have been an important research topic in recent years, and Taub’s (2001) model of metaphor formation in signs has been influential in the field. In this paper, we analyze metaphors in signs of cognition and emotions in Russian Sign Language (RSL) and argue for a modification of Taub’s (2001) theory of metaphor. We demonstrate that metaphor formation in RSL uses a number of mechanisms: a concrete sign can acquire metaphorical meaning without change, a part of a sequential compound can acquire a metaphorical meaning, and a morpheme within a productive sign or a simultaneous compound can acquire a metaphorical meaning. All these processes have parallels in spoken languages, so we argue for a modality-independent model of metaphor formation where metaphorical mapping is divorced from iconicity.","PeriodicalId":43398,"journal":{"name":"Sign Language & Linguistics","volume":"57 1","pages":"157-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the notion of metaphor in sign languages\",\"authors\":\"V. Kimmelman, M. Kyuseva, Yana Lomakina, Daria Perova\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/SLL.00001.KIM\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Metaphors in sign languages have been an important research topic in recent years, and Taub’s (2001) model of metaphor formation in signs has been influential in the field. In this paper, we analyze metaphors in signs of cognition and emotions in Russian Sign Language (RSL) and argue for a modification of Taub’s (2001) theory of metaphor. We demonstrate that metaphor formation in RSL uses a number of mechanisms: a concrete sign can acquire metaphorical meaning without change, a part of a sequential compound can acquire a metaphorical meaning, and a morpheme within a productive sign or a simultaneous compound can acquire a metaphorical meaning. All these processes have parallels in spoken languages, so we argue for a modality-independent model of metaphor formation where metaphorical mapping is divorced from iconicity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sign Language & Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"157-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sign Language & Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/SLL.00001.KIM\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sign Language & Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/SLL.00001.KIM","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

近年来，手语隐喻一直是一个重要的研究课题，而Taub(2001)的手语隐喻形成模型在该领域颇有影响。本文分析了俄语手语中认知和情感符号中的隐喻，并提出了对Taub(2001)隐喻理论的修正。研究表明，RSL中的隐喻形成有多种机制:一个具体符号可以在不改变的情况下获得隐喻意义，一个顺序复合语的一部分可以获得隐喻意义，一个生产符号或同时复合语中的语素可以获得隐喻意义。所有这些过程在口语中都有相似之处，因此我们主张一种独立于情态的隐喻形成模型，其中隐喻映射与象似性分离。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

On the notion of metaphor in sign languages

Metaphors in sign languages have been an important research topic in recent years, and Taub’s (2001) model of metaphor formation in signs has been influential in the field. In this paper, we analyze metaphors in signs of cognition and emotions in Russian Sign Language (RSL) and argue for a modification of Taub’s (2001) theory of metaphor. We demonstrate that metaphor formation in RSL uses a number of mechanisms: a concrete sign can acquire metaphorical meaning without change, a part of a sequential compound can acquire a metaphorical meaning, and a morpheme within a productive sign or a simultaneous compound can acquire a metaphorical meaning. All these processes have parallels in spoken languages, so we argue for a modality-independent model of metaphor formation where metaphorical mapping is divorced from iconicity.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Sign Language & Linguistics Multiple-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Sign Language & Linguistics is a peer-reviewed, international journal which aims to increase our understanding of language by providing an academic forum for researchers to discuss sign languages in the larger context of natural language, crosslinguistically and crossmodally. SLL presents studies that apply existing theoretical insights to sign language in order to further our understanding of SL; it investigates and expands our knowledge of grammar based on the study of SL and it specifically addresses the effect of modality (signed vs. spoken) on the structure of grammar.