单侧唇裂鼻畸形:以基础为基础的鼻部整形方法。

R. Tse, E. Mercan, D. Fisher, R. Hopper, C. Birgfeld, J. Gruss
{"title":"单侧唇裂鼻畸形:以基础为基础的鼻部整形方法。","authors":"R. Tse, E. Mercan, D. Fisher, R. Hopper, C. Birgfeld, J. Gruss","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000006182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nCleft lip results in disruption of the nasal foundation and collapse of tip structures. Most approaches to primary rhinoplasty focus on correction of lower lateral cartilages; however, recurrent deformity is common, and secondary revision is frequently required. The authors describe an alternate approach that focuses on the foundation to \"upright the nose,\" without any nasal tip dissection. This study assessed changes with surgery and with growth. Secondary goals were to compare methods of sidewall reconstruction and septoplasty and to identify predictors of relapse.\n\n\nMETHODS\nConsecutive patients undergoing repair (n = 102) were assessed. Images were captured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 5 years of age (when available) using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry. Standard anthropometric and contemporary shape-based analysis (volume ratio, dorsal deviation, and alar-cheek definition) was performed to assess longitudinal changes. Images of age-matched normal control subjects were used for comparison.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSignificant changes in anthropometric and morphometric measurements occurred following surgery. Postoperative form was similar to controls immediately after surgery and at 5 years. Nasal corrections were satisfactory, and only two patients have elected to undergo revision. When subjects were grouped according to cleft type, we found the same trends. When comparing different methods of nasal sidewall reconstruction or septoplasty, we found no differences. Alveolar cleft width was a significant predictor of worse preoperative and postoperative form.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nSignificant nasal correction can be achieved by means of reconstruction of nasal foundation, without nasal tip dissection. Preservation of tissue planes may allow for easier secondary revision, if necessary.\n\n\nCLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE\nTherapeutic, IV.","PeriodicalId":20168,"journal":{"name":"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity: Foundation-Based Approach to Primary Rhinoplasty.\",\"authors\":\"R. Tse, E. Mercan, D. Fisher, R. Hopper, C. Birgfeld, J. Gruss\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000006182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nCleft lip results in disruption of the nasal foundation and collapse of tip structures. Most approaches to primary rhinoplasty focus on correction of lower lateral cartilages; however, recurrent deformity is common, and secondary revision is frequently required. The authors describe an alternate approach that focuses on the foundation to \\\"upright the nose,\\\" without any nasal tip dissection. This study assessed changes with surgery and with growth. Secondary goals were to compare methods of sidewall reconstruction and septoplasty and to identify predictors of relapse.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nConsecutive patients undergoing repair (n = 102) were assessed. Images were captured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 5 years of age (when available) using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry. Standard anthropometric and contemporary shape-based analysis (volume ratio, dorsal deviation, and alar-cheek definition) was performed to assess longitudinal changes. Images of age-matched normal control subjects were used for comparison.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nSignificant changes in anthropometric and morphometric measurements occurred following surgery. Postoperative form was similar to controls immediately after surgery and at 5 years. Nasal corrections were satisfactory, and only two patients have elected to undergo revision. When subjects were grouped according to cleft type, we found the same trends. When comparing different methods of nasal sidewall reconstruction or septoplasty, we found no differences. Alveolar cleft width was a significant predictor of worse preoperative and postoperative form.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nSignificant nasal correction can be achieved by means of reconstruction of nasal foundation, without nasal tip dissection. Preservation of tissue planes may allow for easier secondary revision, if necessary.\\n\\n\\nCLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE\\nTherapeutic, IV.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

摘要

背景唇裂会导致鼻部基础的破坏和鼻尖结构的崩溃。大多数鼻整形术的主要方法是矫正下外侧软骨;然而,复发性畸形是常见的,并且经常需要二次翻修。作者描述了另一种方法,即专注于“直立鼻子”的基础,而不需要任何鼻尖解剖。这项研究评估了手术和生长的变化。次要目的是比较侧壁重建和鼻中隔成形术的方法,并确定复发的预测因素。方法对连续接受修复手术的102例患者进行评估。术前、术后和5岁时(可用时)采用三维立体摄影测量法采集图像。采用标准人体测量学和现代基于形状的分析(体积比、背侧偏差和鼻翼-脸颊定义)来评估纵向变化。使用年龄匹配的正常对照受试者的图像进行比较。结果手术后人体测量和形态测量发生显著变化。术后形态与术后立即和5年时的对照组相似。鼻腔矫正是令人满意的,只有两名患者选择接受修正。当研究对象按照裂缝类型分组时,我们发现了同样的趋势。当比较不同的鼻壁重建或鼻中隔成形术时,我们发现没有差异。牙槽裂宽度是术前和术后牙槽裂恶化的重要预测因子。结论采用鼻根重建术,无需鼻尖剥离,鼻部矫正效果显著。如有必要,保留组织平面可使二次翻修更容易。临床问题/证据治疗水平,IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity: Foundation-Based Approach to Primary Rhinoplasty.
BACKGROUND Cleft lip results in disruption of the nasal foundation and collapse of tip structures. Most approaches to primary rhinoplasty focus on correction of lower lateral cartilages; however, recurrent deformity is common, and secondary revision is frequently required. The authors describe an alternate approach that focuses on the foundation to "upright the nose," without any nasal tip dissection. This study assessed changes with surgery and with growth. Secondary goals were to compare methods of sidewall reconstruction and septoplasty and to identify predictors of relapse. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing repair (n = 102) were assessed. Images were captured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 5 years of age (when available) using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry. Standard anthropometric and contemporary shape-based analysis (volume ratio, dorsal deviation, and alar-cheek definition) was performed to assess longitudinal changes. Images of age-matched normal control subjects were used for comparison. RESULTS Significant changes in anthropometric and morphometric measurements occurred following surgery. Postoperative form was similar to controls immediately after surgery and at 5 years. Nasal corrections were satisfactory, and only two patients have elected to undergo revision. When subjects were grouped according to cleft type, we found the same trends. When comparing different methods of nasal sidewall reconstruction or septoplasty, we found no differences. Alveolar cleft width was a significant predictor of worse preoperative and postoperative form. CONCLUSIONS Significant nasal correction can be achieved by means of reconstruction of nasal foundation, without nasal tip dissection. Preservation of tissue planes may allow for easier secondary revision, if necessary. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, IV.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信