{"title":"灰姑娘和大怪物:邮政艺术和博物馆","authors":"P. Meijden","doi":"10.1080/00233609.2016.1231712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SummaryTaking the difficulties involved in presenting Mail Art in a museum context as its point of departure, this article explores the conditions that Mail Art imposes on its own display. After a short introduction to the art form as a genre, two theoretical positions vis-a-vis Mail Art are analysed and shown to leave the matter of its communication with a secondary audience undiscussed. In order to arrive at a preliminary idea of the considerations involved, the discourse surrounding the new “relational” art of the 1990s (Nicolas Bourriaud, Claire Bishop, Jacques Ranciere) is drawn upon to explore the question of whether a Mail Art display can be seen as an illustration of a specific form of communication, as a suggestion to a secondary audience to communicate differently or as a model of communication. Each step is accompanied by an analysis of one or more works: Ken Friedman’s Omaha Flow Systems (1973), Niels Lomholt and Tom Elling’s Mr. Klein-project (1978–1981), Rod Summers’ VEC Secret Exchange and ...","PeriodicalId":41575,"journal":{"name":"KONSTHISTORISK TIDSKRIFT","volume":"10 1","pages":"75-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cinderella and the Big Monster: Mail Art and the Museum\",\"authors\":\"P. Meijden\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00233609.2016.1231712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SummaryTaking the difficulties involved in presenting Mail Art in a museum context as its point of departure, this article explores the conditions that Mail Art imposes on its own display. After a short introduction to the art form as a genre, two theoretical positions vis-a-vis Mail Art are analysed and shown to leave the matter of its communication with a secondary audience undiscussed. In order to arrive at a preliminary idea of the considerations involved, the discourse surrounding the new “relational” art of the 1990s (Nicolas Bourriaud, Claire Bishop, Jacques Ranciere) is drawn upon to explore the question of whether a Mail Art display can be seen as an illustration of a specific form of communication, as a suggestion to a secondary audience to communicate differently or as a model of communication. Each step is accompanied by an analysis of one or more works: Ken Friedman’s Omaha Flow Systems (1973), Niels Lomholt and Tom Elling’s Mr. Klein-project (1978–1981), Rod Summers’ VEC Secret Exchange and ...\",\"PeriodicalId\":41575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KONSTHISTORISK TIDSKRIFT\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"75-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KONSTHISTORISK TIDSKRIFT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00233609.2016.1231712\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KONSTHISTORISK TIDSKRIFT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00233609.2016.1231712","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文以“邮件艺术”在博物馆语境中呈现的困难为出发点,探讨了“邮件艺术”在自身展示中所处的条件。在对作为一种流派的艺术形式进行简短的介绍之后,分析并展示了两种相对于邮件艺术的理论立场,从而使其与次要受众的交流问题不被讨论。为了对所涉及的考虑有一个初步的想法,围绕20世纪90年代的新“关系”艺术(Nicolas Bourriaud, Claire Bishop, Jacques Ranciere)的话语被吸引来探讨邮件艺术展示是否可以被视为一种特定形式的交流的说明,作为对次要观众的建议,以不同的方式进行交流,或者作为一种交流模式。每一步都伴随着对一部或多部作品的分析:肯·弗里德曼的《奥马哈流系统》(1973),尼尔斯·隆霍尔特和汤姆·埃林的《克莱因计划》(1978-1981),罗德·萨默斯的《VEC秘密交换》和……
Cinderella and the Big Monster: Mail Art and the Museum
SummaryTaking the difficulties involved in presenting Mail Art in a museum context as its point of departure, this article explores the conditions that Mail Art imposes on its own display. After a short introduction to the art form as a genre, two theoretical positions vis-a-vis Mail Art are analysed and shown to leave the matter of its communication with a secondary audience undiscussed. In order to arrive at a preliminary idea of the considerations involved, the discourse surrounding the new “relational” art of the 1990s (Nicolas Bourriaud, Claire Bishop, Jacques Ranciere) is drawn upon to explore the question of whether a Mail Art display can be seen as an illustration of a specific form of communication, as a suggestion to a secondary audience to communicate differently or as a model of communication. Each step is accompanied by an analysis of one or more works: Ken Friedman’s Omaha Flow Systems (1973), Niels Lomholt and Tom Elling’s Mr. Klein-project (1978–1981), Rod Summers’ VEC Secret Exchange and ...
期刊介绍:
Konsthistorisk tidskrift/Journal of Art History includes investigations on art, architecture, and visual culture. We welcome articles on works, creators, and specific themes, as well as on theory and historiography. Accepted articles can be thorough explorations of a topic in accordance with a standard academic genre. We also welcome texts in a shorter, less finished format, functioning as openings to discussions.