条件反射历史和设定刺激控制刻板印象或玩具游戏的参与

R.Douglas Greer , Constance Dena Saxe , Barbara J. Becker , Robert F. Mirabella
{"title":"条件反射历史和设定刺激控制刻板印象或玩具游戏的参与","authors":"R.Douglas Greer ,&nbsp;Constance Dena Saxe ,&nbsp;Barbara J. Becker ,&nbsp;Robert F. Mirabella","doi":"10.1016/0270-4684(85)90015-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two experiments were performed with five developmentally disabled individuals to test the relationship between toys as conditioned reinforces and stereotypy. Data consisted of the number of 5 second intervals containing toy play and stereotypy in 10 minute sessions. Experiment 1 was done with two students who were selected because they had a history of playing with preferred toys and were not noted for stereotypy. They were observed under phases with and without toys to determine whether the removal of the toy would occasion increases in stereotypy. Probes were done 5 and 6 months after the third phase. Results showed that removal of the toys occasioned stereotypy and reinstatement of the toys eliminated stereotypy. Experiment 2 was done with three young adults who were selected because they had low or nonexistent toy play and high rates of stereotypy. After the baseline, they were conditioned to play with toys during training sessions and observed in separate free operant sessions (baseline conditions). A multiple baseline across subjects was used. Five probe sessions with the toys were conducted with each participant after 6 months without access to the toys. Results showed that the training sessions affected the free operant behavior of each subject in variable degrees. The participants engaged in substantially less stereotypy and substantially more toy play. Six months later when the toys were reinstated without additional training, stereotypy was low and toy play high. Conditioning reinforcers for play, such as toys, may result in a durable and possibly more cost effective procedure for dealing with stereotypy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100080,"journal":{"name":"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0270-4684(85)90015-1","citationCount":"57","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conditioning histories and setting stimuli controlling engagement in stereotypy or toy play\",\"authors\":\"R.Douglas Greer ,&nbsp;Constance Dena Saxe ,&nbsp;Barbara J. Becker ,&nbsp;Robert F. Mirabella\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0270-4684(85)90015-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Two experiments were performed with five developmentally disabled individuals to test the relationship between toys as conditioned reinforces and stereotypy. Data consisted of the number of 5 second intervals containing toy play and stereotypy in 10 minute sessions. Experiment 1 was done with two students who were selected because they had a history of playing with preferred toys and were not noted for stereotypy. They were observed under phases with and without toys to determine whether the removal of the toy would occasion increases in stereotypy. Probes were done 5 and 6 months after the third phase. Results showed that removal of the toys occasioned stereotypy and reinstatement of the toys eliminated stereotypy. Experiment 2 was done with three young adults who were selected because they had low or nonexistent toy play and high rates of stereotypy. After the baseline, they were conditioned to play with toys during training sessions and observed in separate free operant sessions (baseline conditions). A multiple baseline across subjects was used. Five probe sessions with the toys were conducted with each participant after 6 months without access to the toys. Results showed that the training sessions affected the free operant behavior of each subject in variable degrees. The participants engaged in substantially less stereotypy and substantially more toy play. Six months later when the toys were reinstated without additional training, stereotypy was low and toy play high. Conditioning reinforcers for play, such as toys, may result in a durable and possibly more cost effective procedure for dealing with stereotypy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0270-4684(85)90015-1\",\"citationCount\":\"57\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0270468485900151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0270468485900151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

摘要

对5名发育障碍个体进行了两个实验,以测试玩具作为条件强化和刻板印象之间的关系。数据包括在10分钟的会话中包含玩具玩和刻板印象的5秒间隔的次数。实验一是用两个学生做的,他们被选中是因为他们有玩过喜欢的玩具的历史,并且没有刻板印象。他们在有玩具和没有玩具的阶段进行观察,以确定玩具的移除是否会引起刻板印象的增加。在第三阶段后5个月和6个月进行探针。结果表明,玩具的移除引起刻板印象,而玩具的恢复消除了刻板印象。实验二是用三个年轻人做的,他们被选中是因为他们很少或根本不玩玩具,而且有很高的刻板印象。基线后,他们在训练期间被训练玩玩具,并在单独的自由操作阶段(基线条件)进行观察。在受试者之间使用多重基线。6个月后,每个参与者与玩具进行了5次探查。结果表明,训练对被试的自由操作行为有不同程度的影响。参与者的刻板印象大大减少,玩玩具的时间大大增加。六个月后,当这些玩具在没有额外训练的情况下被放回原处时,刻板印象降低了,玩具玩得更多了。游戏的条件反射强化物,如玩具,可能会产生一种持久的、可能更具成本效益的处理刻板印象的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conditioning histories and setting stimuli controlling engagement in stereotypy or toy play

Two experiments were performed with five developmentally disabled individuals to test the relationship between toys as conditioned reinforces and stereotypy. Data consisted of the number of 5 second intervals containing toy play and stereotypy in 10 minute sessions. Experiment 1 was done with two students who were selected because they had a history of playing with preferred toys and were not noted for stereotypy. They were observed under phases with and without toys to determine whether the removal of the toy would occasion increases in stereotypy. Probes were done 5 and 6 months after the third phase. Results showed that removal of the toys occasioned stereotypy and reinstatement of the toys eliminated stereotypy. Experiment 2 was done with three young adults who were selected because they had low or nonexistent toy play and high rates of stereotypy. After the baseline, they were conditioned to play with toys during training sessions and observed in separate free operant sessions (baseline conditions). A multiple baseline across subjects was used. Five probe sessions with the toys were conducted with each participant after 6 months without access to the toys. Results showed that the training sessions affected the free operant behavior of each subject in variable degrees. The participants engaged in substantially less stereotypy and substantially more toy play. Six months later when the toys were reinstated without additional training, stereotypy was low and toy play high. Conditioning reinforcers for play, such as toys, may result in a durable and possibly more cost effective procedure for dealing with stereotypy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信