尼日尔三角洲凝析气藏概率评估中早期纳入动态数据的价值论证

F. Ogbuagu, Lynn Silpngarmlers
{"title":"尼日尔三角洲凝析气藏概率评估中早期纳入动态数据的价值论证","authors":"F. Ogbuagu, Lynn Silpngarmlers","doi":"10.2118/198830-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The paper aims to highlight the importance of using adequate dynamic data to ground-truth reservoir simulation models early in the production life of a field. This study also highlights the benefits of adequate instrumentation and data capture, as well as the need to review assumptions made for green fields in their first few production years.\n This study reviews two vintages of probabilistic assessment for an offshore gas condensate reservoir. An earlier probabilistic assessment for the case study reservoir was built based primarily on core data from two analogous reservoirs, one of which was from the same field, prior to the availability of bottom hole pressure and drawdown data. Initial history match and forecasts showed a significantly poor production performance with significant impact on the condensate reserves volumes from the single well in the reservoir.\n Following the acquisition of pressure data from the downhole gauges and pressure transient analyses results, the model recalibrated in line with estimated distance to boundaries, drawdown and productivity indices. Incorporating the additional data from the downhole instrumentation during the history match showed the earth model severely underestimated the permeability of the reservoir. Matching the drawdown and well test data required a significant permeability multiplier for the low and mid case models for the reservoir.\n A comparison of results from both model vintages showed significant differences in the expected production plateau for the reservoir and consequently reserves estimates. These finding demonstrates value of the acquisition of multiple downhole dynamic data and the pitfalls with reservoir performance forecasts and reserves assessments when simulation models are not adequately constrained with dynamic well data early in the production life of the reservoir.","PeriodicalId":11250,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demonstrating the Value of Early Incorporation of Dynamic Data during Probabilistic Assessment for a Niger Delta Gas Condensate Reservoir\",\"authors\":\"F. Ogbuagu, Lynn Silpngarmlers\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/198830-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The paper aims to highlight the importance of using adequate dynamic data to ground-truth reservoir simulation models early in the production life of a field. This study also highlights the benefits of adequate instrumentation and data capture, as well as the need to review assumptions made for green fields in their first few production years.\\n This study reviews two vintages of probabilistic assessment for an offshore gas condensate reservoir. An earlier probabilistic assessment for the case study reservoir was built based primarily on core data from two analogous reservoirs, one of which was from the same field, prior to the availability of bottom hole pressure and drawdown data. Initial history match and forecasts showed a significantly poor production performance with significant impact on the condensate reserves volumes from the single well in the reservoir.\\n Following the acquisition of pressure data from the downhole gauges and pressure transient analyses results, the model recalibrated in line with estimated distance to boundaries, drawdown and productivity indices. Incorporating the additional data from the downhole instrumentation during the history match showed the earth model severely underestimated the permeability of the reservoir. Matching the drawdown and well test data required a significant permeability multiplier for the low and mid case models for the reservoir.\\n A comparison of results from both model vintages showed significant differences in the expected production plateau for the reservoir and consequently reserves estimates. These finding demonstrates value of the acquisition of multiple downhole dynamic data and the pitfalls with reservoir performance forecasts and reserves assessments when simulation models are not adequately constrained with dynamic well data early in the production life of the reservoir.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/198830-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/198830-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在强调在油田生产周期的早期使用足够的动态数据来建立真实油藏模拟模型的重要性。这项研究还强调了充分的仪器和数据捕获的好处,以及需要审查在最初几年生产的绿色油田所做的假设。本文综述了海上凝析气藏概率评价的两个阶段。案例研究油藏的早期概率评估主要基于两个类似油藏的岩心数据,其中一个来自同一油田,在获得井底压力和压降数据之前。最初的历史匹配和预测显示,生产表现非常差,对油藏单井的凝析油储量产生了重大影响。在从井下仪表获取压力数据和压力瞬态分析结果后,该模型根据与边界的估计距离、压降和产能指数重新校准。结合历史匹配过程中井下仪器的附加数据,地球模型严重低估了储层的渗透率。为了匹配压降和试井数据,油藏的低、中情况模型需要显著的渗透率倍增器。两个模型年份的结果比较表明,储层的预期生产平台和储量估计存在显著差异。这些发现证明了获取多个井下动态数据的价值,以及在油藏生产早期,当模拟模型没有充分受到动态井数据的约束时,油藏动态预测和储量评估的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Demonstrating the Value of Early Incorporation of Dynamic Data during Probabilistic Assessment for a Niger Delta Gas Condensate Reservoir
The paper aims to highlight the importance of using adequate dynamic data to ground-truth reservoir simulation models early in the production life of a field. This study also highlights the benefits of adequate instrumentation and data capture, as well as the need to review assumptions made for green fields in their first few production years. This study reviews two vintages of probabilistic assessment for an offshore gas condensate reservoir. An earlier probabilistic assessment for the case study reservoir was built based primarily on core data from two analogous reservoirs, one of which was from the same field, prior to the availability of bottom hole pressure and drawdown data. Initial history match and forecasts showed a significantly poor production performance with significant impact on the condensate reserves volumes from the single well in the reservoir. Following the acquisition of pressure data from the downhole gauges and pressure transient analyses results, the model recalibrated in line with estimated distance to boundaries, drawdown and productivity indices. Incorporating the additional data from the downhole instrumentation during the history match showed the earth model severely underestimated the permeability of the reservoir. Matching the drawdown and well test data required a significant permeability multiplier for the low and mid case models for the reservoir. A comparison of results from both model vintages showed significant differences in the expected production plateau for the reservoir and consequently reserves estimates. These finding demonstrates value of the acquisition of multiple downhole dynamic data and the pitfalls with reservoir performance forecasts and reserves assessments when simulation models are not adequately constrained with dynamic well data early in the production life of the reservoir.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信