对新泽西州公共图书馆预算请求的影响

IF 8 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Edith K. Beckett
{"title":"对新泽西州公共图书馆预算请求的影响","authors":"Edith K. Beckett","doi":"10.1108/BL-02-2016-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThis research study aims to examine influences on the public library funding decision from the perspectives of New Jersey mayors and public library directors. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nContent analysis was used to explore statements of 84 public library directors and 45 mayors about what was most/least effective in a recent library budget request. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nAlthough they may differ on the relative importance of a specific concept, the public library directors and mayors in this study have high levels of agreement about what information is important in the budget decision process. \n \n \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \n \n \n \n \nThe primary limitations of the findings of this study stem from the reliability of self-reported data and the low response rates. While the researcher believes that the findings and conclusions are valid for the survey respondents, it is less certain that they are valid for all public libraries in New Jersey, and it is not recommended that the conclusions be extended to public libraries outside of the state which differ in state mandates and other circumstances. \n \n \n \n \nPractical implications \n \n \n \n \nUnderstanding more about the factors that can influence library funding decisions provides insight into the very complex public library funding process and may help public library directors and mayors engage in mutually satisfactory budget negotiations. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThis study contributes to the Library and Information Science research literature on library budgets by examining influences on the public library funding decision, specifically adding the perspectives of mayors and public library directors on a recent budget cycle.","PeriodicalId":44548,"journal":{"name":"Bottom Line","volume":"32 1","pages":"86-96"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influences on New Jersey public library budget requests\",\"authors\":\"Edith K. Beckett\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/BL-02-2016-0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThis research study aims to examine influences on the public library funding decision from the perspectives of New Jersey mayors and public library directors. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nDesign/methodology/approach \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nContent analysis was used to explore statements of 84 public library directors and 45 mayors about what was most/least effective in a recent library budget request. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nFindings \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nAlthough they may differ on the relative importance of a specific concept, the public library directors and mayors in this study have high levels of agreement about what information is important in the budget decision process. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nResearch limitations/implications \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe primary limitations of the findings of this study stem from the reliability of self-reported data and the low response rates. While the researcher believes that the findings and conclusions are valid for the survey respondents, it is less certain that they are valid for all public libraries in New Jersey, and it is not recommended that the conclusions be extended to public libraries outside of the state which differ in state mandates and other circumstances. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nPractical implications \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nUnderstanding more about the factors that can influence library funding decisions provides insight into the very complex public library funding process and may help public library directors and mayors engage in mutually satisfactory budget negotiations. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nOriginality/value \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThis study contributes to the Library and Information Science research literature on library budgets by examining influences on the public library funding decision, specifically adding the perspectives of mayors and public library directors on a recent budget cycle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bottom Line\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"86-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bottom Line\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-02-2016-0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bottom Line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-02-2016-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的本研究旨在探讨新泽西州市长与公共图书馆馆长对公共图书馆拨款决策的影响。设计/方法/方法内容分析用于探讨84名公共图书馆馆长和45名市长关于最近图书馆预算申请中最有效/最无效的陈述。尽管他们在特定概念的相对重要性上可能有所不同,但在本研究中,公共图书馆馆长和市长对预算决策过程中重要信息的认同程度很高。研究局限性/启示本研究结果的主要局限性源于自我报告数据的可靠性和低反应率。虽然研究者认为调查结果和结论对调查对象有效,但不太确定它们是否适用于新泽西州的所有公共图书馆,并且不建议将结论扩展到州外的公共图书馆,这些图书馆在州的任务和其他情况下有所不同。实际意义更多地了解影响图书馆资金决策的因素,有助于深入了解非常复杂的公共图书馆资金流程,并有助于公共图书馆馆长和市长参与双方都满意的预算谈判。独创性/价值本研究通过考察公共图书馆资助决策的影响,特别是在最近的预算周期中增加了市长和公共图书馆主任的观点,为图书馆和信息科学关于图书馆预算的研究文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influences on New Jersey public library budget requests
Purpose This research study aims to examine influences on the public library funding decision from the perspectives of New Jersey mayors and public library directors. Design/methodology/approach Content analysis was used to explore statements of 84 public library directors and 45 mayors about what was most/least effective in a recent library budget request. Findings Although they may differ on the relative importance of a specific concept, the public library directors and mayors in this study have high levels of agreement about what information is important in the budget decision process. Research limitations/implications The primary limitations of the findings of this study stem from the reliability of self-reported data and the low response rates. While the researcher believes that the findings and conclusions are valid for the survey respondents, it is less certain that they are valid for all public libraries in New Jersey, and it is not recommended that the conclusions be extended to public libraries outside of the state which differ in state mandates and other circumstances. Practical implications Understanding more about the factors that can influence library funding decisions provides insight into the very complex public library funding process and may help public library directors and mayors engage in mutually satisfactory budget negotiations. Originality/value This study contributes to the Library and Information Science research literature on library budgets by examining influences on the public library funding decision, specifically adding the perspectives of mayors and public library directors on a recent budget cycle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bottom Line
Bottom Line INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
12.20%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Because The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances is written and edited by well respected figures from the librarian community - you can be assured the topics covered will be particularly relevant to you and your library.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信