Ray Stoddard, C. Duffy, H. Kim, A. Modest, G. Quesnelle, B. Wylie
{"title":"种族对产科超声纪念品的影响[ID: 1376924]","authors":"Ray Stoddard, C. Duffy, H. Kim, A. Modest, G. Quesnelle, B. Wylie","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000930200.58812.dc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Differences in treatment and health outcomes by race are well-documented. Ultrasound photos represent important keepsakes and may affect patient experience and care. We examined whether race and other factors affected the number of keepsakes given during obstetric ultrasound. A secondary outcome was patient satisfaction. METHODS: From October 2021 to September 2022, we distributed a survey after outpatient obstetric ultrasounds at a tertiary care hospital, including questions on demographics, number of photos received, and overall satisfaction. Exclusion criteria included inability to complete the survey in one of four available languages or carrying a multifetal gestation. Ultrasound staff and faculty were blinded to the research question. This study was approved by the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center IRB. RESULTS: Of 405 individuals approached, 251 completed the survey (response rate of 62.0%). Of these, 53.4% identified as White, 16.3% Asian, 10.4% Black, 7.2% as multiple races, 6.8% other race, and 6.0% preferred not to say. In total, 81.3% of patients received photos (median, 4; interquartile range [IQR], 3–6), with no difference in number by race, ethnicity, primary language, or body mass index. Most patients expected to receive photos, with no appreciable differences by race. Ratings for visits were high (IQR, 8–10/10) with no difference between patients who did or did not receive photos or by number of photos. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in number of photos patients received by race. Overall ratings of ultrasound visits were high and not associated with number of keepsakes received. While reassuring, further research is needed into equitable treatment in obstetric ultrasound.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Race on Obstetric Ultrasound Keepsakes [ID: 1376924]\",\"authors\":\"Ray Stoddard, C. Duffy, H. Kim, A. Modest, G. Quesnelle, B. Wylie\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.aog.0000930200.58812.dc\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Differences in treatment and health outcomes by race are well-documented. Ultrasound photos represent important keepsakes and may affect patient experience and care. We examined whether race and other factors affected the number of keepsakes given during obstetric ultrasound. A secondary outcome was patient satisfaction. METHODS: From October 2021 to September 2022, we distributed a survey after outpatient obstetric ultrasounds at a tertiary care hospital, including questions on demographics, number of photos received, and overall satisfaction. Exclusion criteria included inability to complete the survey in one of four available languages or carrying a multifetal gestation. Ultrasound staff and faculty were blinded to the research question. This study was approved by the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center IRB. RESULTS: Of 405 individuals approached, 251 completed the survey (response rate of 62.0%). Of these, 53.4% identified as White, 16.3% Asian, 10.4% Black, 7.2% as multiple races, 6.8% other race, and 6.0% preferred not to say. In total, 81.3% of patients received photos (median, 4; interquartile range [IQR], 3–6), with no difference in number by race, ethnicity, primary language, or body mass index. Most patients expected to receive photos, with no appreciable differences by race. Ratings for visits were high (IQR, 8–10/10) with no difference between patients who did or did not receive photos or by number of photos. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in number of photos patients received by race. Overall ratings of ultrasound visits were high and not associated with number of keepsakes received. While reassuring, further research is needed into equitable treatment in obstetric ultrasound.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000930200.58812.dc\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000930200.58812.dc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Race on Obstetric Ultrasound Keepsakes [ID: 1376924]
INTRODUCTION: Differences in treatment and health outcomes by race are well-documented. Ultrasound photos represent important keepsakes and may affect patient experience and care. We examined whether race and other factors affected the number of keepsakes given during obstetric ultrasound. A secondary outcome was patient satisfaction. METHODS: From October 2021 to September 2022, we distributed a survey after outpatient obstetric ultrasounds at a tertiary care hospital, including questions on demographics, number of photos received, and overall satisfaction. Exclusion criteria included inability to complete the survey in one of four available languages or carrying a multifetal gestation. Ultrasound staff and faculty were blinded to the research question. This study was approved by the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center IRB. RESULTS: Of 405 individuals approached, 251 completed the survey (response rate of 62.0%). Of these, 53.4% identified as White, 16.3% Asian, 10.4% Black, 7.2% as multiple races, 6.8% other race, and 6.0% preferred not to say. In total, 81.3% of patients received photos (median, 4; interquartile range [IQR], 3–6), with no difference in number by race, ethnicity, primary language, or body mass index. Most patients expected to receive photos, with no appreciable differences by race. Ratings for visits were high (IQR, 8–10/10) with no difference between patients who did or did not receive photos or by number of photos. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in number of photos patients received by race. Overall ratings of ultrasound visits were high and not associated with number of keepsakes received. While reassuring, further research is needed into equitable treatment in obstetric ultrasound.