P. Passarelli, M. Ferro, P. Angelis, P. Papi, G. B. Piccirillo, V. Desantis, R. Papa, G. Pompa, A. D'addona
{"title":"在无皮瓣全引导手术中,计划植入物和放置植入物三维位置的准确性比较:来自单队列回顾性研究的1年随访","authors":"P. Passarelli, M. Ferro, P. Angelis, P. Papi, G. B. Piccirillo, V. Desantis, R. Papa, G. Pompa, A. D'addona","doi":"10.23805/JO.2020.12.03.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim This research was performed to evaluate the in vivo accuracy of flapless, computer-guided implant placement by comparing the three-dimensional position of planned and placed implants. \nMaterials and methods In this retrospective study the results from a 1-year follow-up of a single-cohort of 15 patients (30 implants) are reported. A 3D planning software was used to determine the correct placement, considering the bone volume, the functional and the aesthetic prosthetic result. CAD/CAM technology was used to turn the virtual plan into the surgical guide. \nResults The statistical analysis showed a mean radial deviation of the implant head of 0.3 mm (SD 0.21), a mean radial deviation of the implant apex of 0.58 mm (SD 0.33), a mean depth deviation of the implant head of 0.37 mm (SD 0.29), a mean depth deviation of the implant apex of 0.43 mm (SD 0.25) and a mean angular deviation of the long axis of 2.87° (SD 1.99); the mean actual translation between the planned and the placed implant was 0.66 mm (SD 0.35) at implant platform and 1.04 mm (SD 0.47) at apex. \nConclusion Flapless and computer-guided implant placement proved to be a reliable clinical option for an accurate implant insertion.","PeriodicalId":42724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osseointegration","volume":"27 1","pages":"229-235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy comparison between the three-dimensional position of planned and placed implants with flapless fully-guided surgery: 1-year follow-up from a single-cohort retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"P. Passarelli, M. Ferro, P. Angelis, P. Papi, G. B. Piccirillo, V. Desantis, R. Papa, G. Pompa, A. D'addona\",\"doi\":\"10.23805/JO.2020.12.03.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim This research was performed to evaluate the in vivo accuracy of flapless, computer-guided implant placement by comparing the three-dimensional position of planned and placed implants. \\nMaterials and methods In this retrospective study the results from a 1-year follow-up of a single-cohort of 15 patients (30 implants) are reported. A 3D planning software was used to determine the correct placement, considering the bone volume, the functional and the aesthetic prosthetic result. CAD/CAM technology was used to turn the virtual plan into the surgical guide. \\nResults The statistical analysis showed a mean radial deviation of the implant head of 0.3 mm (SD 0.21), a mean radial deviation of the implant apex of 0.58 mm (SD 0.33), a mean depth deviation of the implant head of 0.37 mm (SD 0.29), a mean depth deviation of the implant apex of 0.43 mm (SD 0.25) and a mean angular deviation of the long axis of 2.87° (SD 1.99); the mean actual translation between the planned and the placed implant was 0.66 mm (SD 0.35) at implant platform and 1.04 mm (SD 0.47) at apex. \\nConclusion Flapless and computer-guided implant placement proved to be a reliable clinical option for an accurate implant insertion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Osseointegration\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"229-235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Osseointegration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2020.12.03.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osseointegration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2020.12.03.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的通过比较计划种植体和放置种植体的三维位置,评价无皮瓣、计算机引导种植体放置的体内准确性。材料和方法本回顾性研究报告了15例患者(30例植入物)1年随访的结果。采用三维规划软件,综合考虑骨体积、功能和美观的修复效果,确定正确的放置位置。采用CAD/CAM技术将虚拟平面转化为手术导向。结果统计分析显示,种植体头平均径向偏差0.3 mm (SD 0.21),种植体尖平均径向偏差0.58 mm (SD 0.33),种植体头平均深度偏差0.37 mm (SD 0.29),种植体尖平均深度偏差0.43 mm (SD 0.25),种植体长轴平均角偏差2.87°(SD 1.99);计划种植体与放置种植体之间的平均实际平移量在种植体平台为0.66 mm (SD 0.35),在顶端为1.04 mm (SD 0.47)。结论无皮瓣和计算机引导种植体植入是一种可靠的临床选择。
Accuracy comparison between the three-dimensional position of planned and placed implants with flapless fully-guided surgery: 1-year follow-up from a single-cohort retrospective study
Aim This research was performed to evaluate the in vivo accuracy of flapless, computer-guided implant placement by comparing the three-dimensional position of planned and placed implants.
Materials and methods In this retrospective study the results from a 1-year follow-up of a single-cohort of 15 patients (30 implants) are reported. A 3D planning software was used to determine the correct placement, considering the bone volume, the functional and the aesthetic prosthetic result. CAD/CAM technology was used to turn the virtual plan into the surgical guide.
Results The statistical analysis showed a mean radial deviation of the implant head of 0.3 mm (SD 0.21), a mean radial deviation of the implant apex of 0.58 mm (SD 0.33), a mean depth deviation of the implant head of 0.37 mm (SD 0.29), a mean depth deviation of the implant apex of 0.43 mm (SD 0.25) and a mean angular deviation of the long axis of 2.87° (SD 1.99); the mean actual translation between the planned and the placed implant was 0.66 mm (SD 0.35) at implant platform and 1.04 mm (SD 0.47) at apex.
Conclusion Flapless and computer-guided implant placement proved to be a reliable clinical option for an accurate implant insertion.