Varsha Sunil Manekar, Ramakrishna S Shenoi, Sunil M Manekar, Suresh Morey
{"title":"现代牙槽嵴分割和扩张设备在牙槽嵴水平缺损种植管理中的效果：系统综述。","authors":"Varsha Sunil Manekar, Ramakrishna S Shenoi, Sunil M Manekar, Suresh Morey","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_423_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The alveolar ridge split and expansion (ARSE) can be performed using conventional devices (osteotome/chisel) or modern devices (ultrasonographic [USG], motorized ridge expansion [MRE], etc.). The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of modern devices for ARSE. This review has been registered at PROSPERO under the number CRD42020213264. A systematic search was conducted by two reviewers independently in databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Grey Open, Hand search of reference lists of relevant studies, and previously published systematic reviews. The article published until September 2020 were searched for this review. The searches identified 24 eligible studies, twenty-two cohort and two randomized control trial studies. A total of 1287 dental implants were installed in 634 patients with the age range of 17-70 years and a minimum of 3 months of follow-up. Ten articles of USG device and seven of MRE device were finally evaluated for metanalysis. The mean ridge width gain was 3.40 mm (USG device) and 2.83 mm (MRE device). The overall implant survival rate was 98.07%. Mean width gain between USG and MRE devices was significantly different (<i>P</i> < 0.0001, HS). Test of heterogeneity was significant (<i>Q</i> = 88.3877, <i>P</i> < 0.0001, HS) and there was no publication bias (Intercept = 6.6634, <i>P</i> = 0.6142, NS) by Egger's test. The most commonly used devices were USG and MRE. USG is more effective for osteo-mobilization type and MRE device for minimally invasive osteo-condensation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19860,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Magazine Letters","volume":"83 1","pages":"369-382"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10806315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of modern devices of alveolar ridge split and expansion in the management of horizontally deficient alveolar ridge for dental implant: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Varsha Sunil Manekar, Ramakrishna S Shenoi, Sunil M Manekar, Suresh Morey\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/njms.njms_423_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The alveolar ridge split and expansion (ARSE) can be performed using conventional devices (osteotome/chisel) or modern devices (ultrasonographic [USG], motorized ridge expansion [MRE], etc.). The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of modern devices for ARSE. This review has been registered at PROSPERO under the number CRD42020213264. A systematic search was conducted by two reviewers independently in databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Grey Open, Hand search of reference lists of relevant studies, and previously published systematic reviews. The article published until September 2020 were searched for this review. The searches identified 24 eligible studies, twenty-two cohort and two randomized control trial studies. A total of 1287 dental implants were installed in 634 patients with the age range of 17-70 years and a minimum of 3 months of follow-up. Ten articles of USG device and seven of MRE device were finally evaluated for metanalysis. The mean ridge width gain was 3.40 mm (USG device) and 2.83 mm (MRE device). The overall implant survival rate was 98.07%. Mean width gain between USG and MRE devices was significantly different (<i>P</i> < 0.0001, HS). Test of heterogeneity was significant (<i>Q</i> = 88.3877, <i>P</i> < 0.0001, HS) and there was no publication bias (Intercept = 6.6634, <i>P</i> = 0.6142, NS) by Egger's test. The most commonly used devices were USG and MRE. USG is more effective for osteo-mobilization type and MRE device for minimally invasive osteo-condensation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Magazine Letters\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"369-382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10806315/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Magazine Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_423_21\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Magazine Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_423_21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of modern devices of alveolar ridge split and expansion in the management of horizontally deficient alveolar ridge for dental implant: A systematic review.
The alveolar ridge split and expansion (ARSE) can be performed using conventional devices (osteotome/chisel) or modern devices (ultrasonographic [USG], motorized ridge expansion [MRE], etc.). The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of modern devices for ARSE. This review has been registered at PROSPERO under the number CRD42020213264. A systematic search was conducted by two reviewers independently in databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Grey Open, Hand search of reference lists of relevant studies, and previously published systematic reviews. The article published until September 2020 were searched for this review. The searches identified 24 eligible studies, twenty-two cohort and two randomized control trial studies. A total of 1287 dental implants were installed in 634 patients with the age range of 17-70 years and a minimum of 3 months of follow-up. Ten articles of USG device and seven of MRE device were finally evaluated for metanalysis. The mean ridge width gain was 3.40 mm (USG device) and 2.83 mm (MRE device). The overall implant survival rate was 98.07%. Mean width gain between USG and MRE devices was significantly different (P < 0.0001, HS). Test of heterogeneity was significant (Q = 88.3877, P < 0.0001, HS) and there was no publication bias (Intercept = 6.6634, P = 0.6142, NS) by Egger's test. The most commonly used devices were USG and MRE. USG is more effective for osteo-mobilization type and MRE device for minimally invasive osteo-condensation.
期刊介绍：
Philosophical Magazine Letters is the rapid communications part of the highly respected Philosophical Magazine, which was first published in 1798. Its Editors consider for publication short and timely contributions in the field of condensed matter describing original results, theories and concepts relating to the structure and properties of crystalline materials, ceramics, polymers, glasses, amorphous films, composites and soft matter. Articles emphasizing experimental, theoretical and modelling studies on solids, especially those that interpret behaviour on a microscopic, atomic or electronic scale, are particularly appropriate.
Manuscripts are considered on the strict condition that they have been submitted only to Philosophical Magazine Letters , that they have not been published already, and that they are not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
