当代现实的本质

B. Bratina
{"title":"当代现实的本质","authors":"B. Bratina","doi":"10.5937/zrffp53-40499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reality seems to have become a matter of ownership-everyone supposedly has the right to 'their' reality. In contrast, to this supposed freedom of acceptance, there is a 'scientific' interpretation of reality, which claims to be the only correct one in modern times. The text presented here wants to show not only the limitations of the 'scientific' interpretation, as a pure formalism, but especially that its ideological glosses cannot reveal the reality. Instead, they falsify it, not just as the success of theory, but as reality itself. This is especially visible in modern times. In that name, over a hundred years have passed since the theory suppresses subjectivity in the explanation of reality; philosophy at the level of the establishment has accepted this very task. However, it was not motivated only by theoretical reasons, but intentionally, as an imposition of the nature of reality and the idea of the human nature of subjectivity. Although the 'primacy of the theoretical' was promoted after Kant's 'primacy of the practical', theory as a formalism manifested violence in its own understanding of reality and at the same time, after all the apologies, subjectivity was not accepted within it as the foundation of reality, but as a place of application of systemic results. The author shows that this procedure is possible as an action in reality, but that it is beyond his power to explain it. Finally, the author is in favour of reintroducing subjectivity into the theoretical structuring of reality, because its interpretation without subjectivity is as wrong as it is involved in the interests of subjectivity that are not subjectivity as subjectivity. They think that from the epistemological situation and diagnosis of modernity, it is possible to derive a theory that can take into account the essential nature of subjectivity in the interpretation of the nature of reality.","PeriodicalId":55773,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Filozofskog Fakulteta u Pristini","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The nature of contemporary reality\",\"authors\":\"B. Bratina\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/zrffp53-40499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reality seems to have become a matter of ownership-everyone supposedly has the right to 'their' reality. In contrast, to this supposed freedom of acceptance, there is a 'scientific' interpretation of reality, which claims to be the only correct one in modern times. The text presented here wants to show not only the limitations of the 'scientific' interpretation, as a pure formalism, but especially that its ideological glosses cannot reveal the reality. Instead, they falsify it, not just as the success of theory, but as reality itself. This is especially visible in modern times. In that name, over a hundred years have passed since the theory suppresses subjectivity in the explanation of reality; philosophy at the level of the establishment has accepted this very task. However, it was not motivated only by theoretical reasons, but intentionally, as an imposition of the nature of reality and the idea of the human nature of subjectivity. Although the 'primacy of the theoretical' was promoted after Kant's 'primacy of the practical', theory as a formalism manifested violence in its own understanding of reality and at the same time, after all the apologies, subjectivity was not accepted within it as the foundation of reality, but as a place of application of systemic results. The author shows that this procedure is possible as an action in reality, but that it is beyond his power to explain it. Finally, the author is in favour of reintroducing subjectivity into the theoretical structuring of reality, because its interpretation without subjectivity is as wrong as it is involved in the interests of subjectivity that are not subjectivity as subjectivity. They think that from the epistemological situation and diagnosis of modernity, it is possible to derive a theory that can take into account the essential nature of subjectivity in the interpretation of the nature of reality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik Radova Filozofskog Fakulteta u Pristini\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik Radova Filozofskog Fakulteta u Pristini\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/zrffp53-40499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Filozofskog Fakulteta u Pristini","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zrffp53-40499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现实似乎已经变成了所有权的问题——每个人都应该有“他们的”现实的权利。与这种假定的接受自由相反,有一种对现实的“科学”解释,它声称是现代唯一正确的解释。本文不仅要说明作为纯粹形式主义的“科学”解释的局限性,而且要特别说明其意识形态的粉饰不能揭示现实。相反,他们不仅把它当作理论的成功,而且把它当作现实本身来证伪。这在现代尤为明显。在这个名义下,这个理论在对现实的解释中压制主观性已经过去了一百多年;建制派的哲学已经接受了这个任务。然而,它的动机不仅仅是理论原因,而是有意的,作为现实的本质和主体性的人性的观念的强加。虽然“理论的首要”是在康德的“实践的首要”之后被提倡的,但作为一种形式主义的理论在其对现实的理解中表现出暴力,同时,在所有的道歉之后,主观性在它内部并没有被接受为现实的基础,而是作为一个应用系统结果的地方。作者表明,这一过程在现实中作为一种行为是可能的,但这超出了作者的解释能力。最后,作者赞成将主体性重新引入现实的理论结构,因为没有主体性的解释是错误的,因为它涉及到主体性的利益,而不是主体性。他们认为,从现代性的认识论情境和诊断中,有可能推导出一种理论,在对现实本质的解释中考虑到主体性的本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The nature of contemporary reality
Reality seems to have become a matter of ownership-everyone supposedly has the right to 'their' reality. In contrast, to this supposed freedom of acceptance, there is a 'scientific' interpretation of reality, which claims to be the only correct one in modern times. The text presented here wants to show not only the limitations of the 'scientific' interpretation, as a pure formalism, but especially that its ideological glosses cannot reveal the reality. Instead, they falsify it, not just as the success of theory, but as reality itself. This is especially visible in modern times. In that name, over a hundred years have passed since the theory suppresses subjectivity in the explanation of reality; philosophy at the level of the establishment has accepted this very task. However, it was not motivated only by theoretical reasons, but intentionally, as an imposition of the nature of reality and the idea of the human nature of subjectivity. Although the 'primacy of the theoretical' was promoted after Kant's 'primacy of the practical', theory as a formalism manifested violence in its own understanding of reality and at the same time, after all the apologies, subjectivity was not accepted within it as the foundation of reality, but as a place of application of systemic results. The author shows that this procedure is possible as an action in reality, but that it is beyond his power to explain it. Finally, the author is in favour of reintroducing subjectivity into the theoretical structuring of reality, because its interpretation without subjectivity is as wrong as it is involved in the interests of subjectivity that are not subjectivity as subjectivity. They think that from the epistemological situation and diagnosis of modernity, it is possible to derive a theory that can take into account the essential nature of subjectivity in the interpretation of the nature of reality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信