社会表征理论对把握海岸脆弱性和加强海岸风险管理的兴趣(社会表征理论对理解海岸脆弱性和改进海岸风险管理的兴趣)

IF 0.7 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Catherine Meur-Ferec, Elisabeth Guillou
{"title":"社会表征理论对把握海岸脆弱性和加强海岸风险管理的兴趣(社会表征理论对理解海岸脆弱性和改进海岸风险管理的兴趣)","authors":"Catherine Meur-Ferec, Elisabeth Guillou","doi":"10.1080/21711976.2019.1644003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This theoretical paper provides a new perspective on coastal vulnerability analysis by combining geography and psycho-social approaches. Most studies on perceptions of coastal risks report that people who are exposed have a low level of perceived vulnerability (they are not anxious), strong place attachment (they love their living place and want to live close to the sea) and are resistant to changes in adaptation strategies (they do not want to move away). For natural scientists and managers, these findings usually appear as paradoxes that enhance vulnerability and lead to these people being labelled ‘irrational’, ‘in denial’, ‘uninformed’ or ‘uneducated’. Based on our long-term studies among coastal inhabitants in France, we believe that using Social Representations Theory (SRT) in this context enables us to go beyond these preconceived and individual-centred ideas towards a more contextualized view. This position extends theoretical risk/vulnerability research and is applicable to coastal risk management.","PeriodicalId":55641,"journal":{"name":"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental","volume":"80 1","pages":"78 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interest of Social Representations Theory to grasp coastal vulnerability and to enhance coastal risk management (Interés de la Teoría de las Representaciones Sociales para entender la vulnerabilidad costera y para mejorar la gestión de los riesgos costeros)\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Meur-Ferec, Elisabeth Guillou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21711976.2019.1644003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This theoretical paper provides a new perspective on coastal vulnerability analysis by combining geography and psycho-social approaches. Most studies on perceptions of coastal risks report that people who are exposed have a low level of perceived vulnerability (they are not anxious), strong place attachment (they love their living place and want to live close to the sea) and are resistant to changes in adaptation strategies (they do not want to move away). For natural scientists and managers, these findings usually appear as paradoxes that enhance vulnerability and lead to these people being labelled ‘irrational’, ‘in denial’, ‘uninformed’ or ‘uneducated’. Based on our long-term studies among coastal inhabitants in France, we believe that using Social Representations Theory (SRT) in this context enables us to go beyond these preconceived and individual-centred ideas towards a more contextualized view. This position extends theoretical risk/vulnerability research and is applicable to coastal risk management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"78 - 89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2019.1644003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2019.1644003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文结合地理学和心理社会学的研究方法,为沿海脆弱性分析提供了新的视角。大多数关于沿海风险感知的研究报告称,暴露于风险的人具有较低的感知脆弱性(他们不焦虑),强烈的地方依恋(他们热爱自己的生活地点并希望住在靠近大海的地方),并且对适应策略的变化有抵抗力(他们不想离开)。对于自然科学家和管理人员来说,这些发现通常看起来像悖论,增加了脆弱性,并导致这些人被贴上“非理性”、“否认”、“不知情”或“未受教育”的标签。根据我们对法国沿海居民的长期研究,我们认为在这种情况下使用社会表征理论(SRT)使我们能够超越这些先入为主和以个人为中心的想法,获得更情境化的观点。该职位扩展了理论风险/脆弱性研究,适用于沿海风险管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interest of Social Representations Theory to grasp coastal vulnerability and to enhance coastal risk management (Interés de la Teoría de las Representaciones Sociales para entender la vulnerabilidad costera y para mejorar la gestión de los riesgos costeros)
ABSTRACT This theoretical paper provides a new perspective on coastal vulnerability analysis by combining geography and psycho-social approaches. Most studies on perceptions of coastal risks report that people who are exposed have a low level of perceived vulnerability (they are not anxious), strong place attachment (they love their living place and want to live close to the sea) and are resistant to changes in adaptation strategies (they do not want to move away). For natural scientists and managers, these findings usually appear as paradoxes that enhance vulnerability and lead to these people being labelled ‘irrational’, ‘in denial’, ‘uninformed’ or ‘uneducated’. Based on our long-term studies among coastal inhabitants in France, we believe that using Social Representations Theory (SRT) in this context enables us to go beyond these preconceived and individual-centred ideas towards a more contextualized view. This position extends theoretical risk/vulnerability research and is applicable to coastal risk management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信