柯勒律治和纽曼:四个方面

IF 0.2 4区哲学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM

Literature and Theology Pub Date : 2021-08-13 DOI:10.1093/litthe/frab021

Gabriel Insausti

{"title":"柯勒律治和纽曼:四个方面","authors":"Gabriel Insausti","doi":"10.1093/litthe/frab021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The influence of Coleridge on Newman has often been cited, but it has also been disputed. Newman himself sometimes denied it or simply expressed his surprise at the ‘coincidences’. In this article I focus on different aspects of Newman’s thought where such influence is apparent: the idea of a ‘sacramental system’, the Church of England as a via media, the theory of development in dogma, and the self. Newman’s mixed feelings about Coleridge are also analysed and an explanation for these is provided.","PeriodicalId":43172,"journal":{"name":"Literature and Theology","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coleridge and Newman: Four Aspects\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Insausti\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/litthe/frab021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The influence of Coleridge on Newman has often been cited, but it has also been disputed. Newman himself sometimes denied it or simply expressed his surprise at the ‘coincidences’. In this article I focus on different aspects of Newman’s thought where such influence is apparent: the idea of a ‘sacramental system’, the Church of England as a via media, the theory of development in dogma, and the self. Newman’s mixed feelings about Coleridge are also analysed and an explanation for these is provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Literature and Theology\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Literature and Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/litthe/frab021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literature and Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/litthe/frab021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

柯勒律治对纽曼的影响经常被引用，但也有争议。纽曼自己有时也否认，或者只是对这些“巧合”表示惊讶。在这篇文章中，我将重点关注纽曼思想的不同方面，这些方面的影响是显而易见的:“圣礼制度”的想法，作为媒介的英国国教，教条发展理论，以及自我。纽曼对柯勒律治的复杂感情也进行了分析，并给出了解释。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Coleridge and Newman: Four Aspects

The influence of Coleridge on Newman has often been cited, but it has also been disputed. Newman himself sometimes denied it or simply expressed his surprise at the ‘coincidences’. In this article I focus on different aspects of Newman’s thought where such influence is apparent: the idea of a ‘sacramental system’, the Church of England as a via media, the theory of development in dogma, and the self. Newman’s mixed feelings about Coleridge are also analysed and an explanation for these is provided.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Literature and Theology Multiple-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Literature and Theology, a quarterly peer-review journal, provides a critical non-confessional forum for both textual analysis and theoretical speculation, encouraging explorations of how religion is embedded in culture. Contributions should address questions pertinent to both literary study and theology broadly understood, and be consistent with the Journal"s overall aim: to engage with and reshape traditional discourses within the studies of literature and religion, and their cognate fields - biblical criticism, literary criticism, philosophy, politics, culture studies, gender studies, artistic theory/practice, and contemporary critical theory/practice.