公民作为数据经济中的消费者:以智慧城市为例

S. Ranchordás
{"title":"公民作为数据经济中的消费者:以智慧城市为例","authors":"S. Ranchordás","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3216389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article offers a critical account of the concept of “citizen-consumer” in the context of smart cities. This hybrid concept emerged in the 1990s with the New Labour Movement in the setting of the liberalization and privatization of public infrastructures to refer to the consumption of public goods and services. The notion of “citizen-consumer” recently reappeared in the literature on smart cities as public bodies collaborate closely with private actors to offer more responsive, efficient, and data-driven public services to their residents and visitors. In this modern form of privatization, public bodies treat citizens as consumers of data-driven services. In this article, I argue that treating citizens as consumers can be problematic for four reasons: (i) citizenship and consumer protection have different political and economic foundations; (ii) it relies on the heavy collection of personal data by both public bodies and private companies; (iii) it assumes—often incorrectly—that citizen-consumers in cities have choices and can refuse to give their consent to the data collection underlying the provision of smart public services; (iv) it excludes citizens who are less tech-savvy, do not fit in the vision of smart cities or wish to remain offline. Drawing on an interdisciplinary analysis of the literature on the liberalization of public services, smart cities and consumer protection, this article aims to contribute to the legal literature by shedding new light on the concept of “citizen-consumer” and its implications for the inclusiveness of public services.","PeriodicalId":15724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Consumer and Market Law","volume":"30 1","pages":"154-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Citizens as Consumers in the Data Economy: The Case of Smart Cities\",\"authors\":\"S. Ranchordás\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3216389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article offers a critical account of the concept of “citizen-consumer” in the context of smart cities. This hybrid concept emerged in the 1990s with the New Labour Movement in the setting of the liberalization and privatization of public infrastructures to refer to the consumption of public goods and services. The notion of “citizen-consumer” recently reappeared in the literature on smart cities as public bodies collaborate closely with private actors to offer more responsive, efficient, and data-driven public services to their residents and visitors. In this modern form of privatization, public bodies treat citizens as consumers of data-driven services. In this article, I argue that treating citizens as consumers can be problematic for four reasons: (i) citizenship and consumer protection have different political and economic foundations; (ii) it relies on the heavy collection of personal data by both public bodies and private companies; (iii) it assumes—often incorrectly—that citizen-consumers in cities have choices and can refuse to give their consent to the data collection underlying the provision of smart public services; (iv) it excludes citizens who are less tech-savvy, do not fit in the vision of smart cities or wish to remain offline. Drawing on an interdisciplinary analysis of the literature on the liberalization of public services, smart cities and consumer protection, this article aims to contribute to the legal literature by shedding new light on the concept of “citizen-consumer” and its implications for the inclusiveness of public services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Consumer and Market Law\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"154-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Consumer and Market Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3216389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Consumer and Market Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3216389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文对智慧城市背景下的“公民-消费者”概念进行了批判性的阐述。这个混合概念出现在20世纪90年代的新劳工运动中,在公共基础设施自由化和私有化的背景下,指的是公共产品和服务的消费。“公民-消费者”的概念最近再次出现在智慧城市的文献中,因为公共机构与私人行为者密切合作,为其居民和游客提供响应更快、更高效、更以数据为导向的公共服务。在这种现代形式的私有化中,公共机构将公民视为数据驱动服务的消费者。在本文中,我认为将公民视为消费者可能存在以下四个问题:(I)公民身份和消费者保护具有不同的政治和经济基础;(ii)它依赖于公共机构和私营公司大量收集个人资料;(iii)它假设——通常是不正确的——城市的公民消费者有选择,可以拒绝同意提供智能公共服务的数据收集;(iv)它排除了不太懂技术、不符合智慧城市愿景或希望保持离线的公民。通过对公共服务自由化、智慧城市和消费者保护相关文献的跨学科分析,本文旨在通过对“公民-消费者”概念及其对公共服务包容性的影响的新阐释,为法律文献做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Citizens as Consumers in the Data Economy: The Case of Smart Cities
This article offers a critical account of the concept of “citizen-consumer” in the context of smart cities. This hybrid concept emerged in the 1990s with the New Labour Movement in the setting of the liberalization and privatization of public infrastructures to refer to the consumption of public goods and services. The notion of “citizen-consumer” recently reappeared in the literature on smart cities as public bodies collaborate closely with private actors to offer more responsive, efficient, and data-driven public services to their residents and visitors. In this modern form of privatization, public bodies treat citizens as consumers of data-driven services. In this article, I argue that treating citizens as consumers can be problematic for four reasons: (i) citizenship and consumer protection have different political and economic foundations; (ii) it relies on the heavy collection of personal data by both public bodies and private companies; (iii) it assumes—often incorrectly—that citizen-consumers in cities have choices and can refuse to give their consent to the data collection underlying the provision of smart public services; (iv) it excludes citizens who are less tech-savvy, do not fit in the vision of smart cities or wish to remain offline. Drawing on an interdisciplinary analysis of the literature on the liberalization of public services, smart cities and consumer protection, this article aims to contribute to the legal literature by shedding new light on the concept of “citizen-consumer” and its implications for the inclusiveness of public services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信