主导角色的利益和理念如何产生重大影响:分析印度在南亚区域合作联盟和经济合作组织中的作用。

IF 3.4 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Md Foysal Jaman Shishir, Nurul Huda Sakib
{"title":"主导角色的利益和理念如何产生重大影响:分析印度在南亚区域合作联盟和经济合作组织中的作用。","authors":"Md Foysal Jaman Shishir, Nurul Huda Sakib","doi":"10.1007/s41111-022-00230-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>States always function as rational actors as protecting the national interests of a state depends on the choices it makes in the international context. Hence, choices and preferences are central to the study of both public policy and international relations. Policies are driven and influenced by the attention and behaviors of the actors which ultimately create a path to failure or success. In the Bay of Bengal Initiatives for Multisectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC), India, in the absence of Pakistan, can enjoy a friendly environment and establish its goal of geopolitical and economic dominance in South Asia and Southeast Asia, while countering China's continuous upsurge. On the other hand, in the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), constant intervention from Pakistan means that India shifts its attention to use its full potential elsewhere. This article is based on secondary sources and illustrates how the interests of a major actor (India) can shape the paths of two similar regional organizations (SAARC and BIMSTEC), despite these organizations sharing characteristics such as the same member states, the same socio-economic situation, and the same vision.</p>","PeriodicalId":44455,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Political Science Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Interests and Ideas of a Dominant Actor Make a Big Difference: Analyzing India's Role in SAARC and BIMSTEC.\",\"authors\":\"Md Foysal Jaman Shishir, Nurul Huda Sakib\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41111-022-00230-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>States always function as rational actors as protecting the national interests of a state depends on the choices it makes in the international context. Hence, choices and preferences are central to the study of both public policy and international relations. Policies are driven and influenced by the attention and behaviors of the actors which ultimately create a path to failure or success. In the Bay of Bengal Initiatives for Multisectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC), India, in the absence of Pakistan, can enjoy a friendly environment and establish its goal of geopolitical and economic dominance in South Asia and Southeast Asia, while countering China's continuous upsurge. On the other hand, in the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), constant intervention from Pakistan means that India shifts its attention to use its full potential elsewhere. This article is based on secondary sources and illustrates how the interests of a major actor (India) can shape the paths of two similar regional organizations (SAARC and BIMSTEC), despite these organizations sharing characteristics such as the same member states, the same socio-economic situation, and the same vision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Political Science Review\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528874/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Political Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-022-00230-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-022-00230-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国家始终是理性的行为体,因为保护一个国家的国家利益取决于它在国际环境中做出的选择。因此,选择和偏好是公共政策和国际关系研究的核心。政策是由行为者的注意力和行为驱动和影响的,这些行为和行为最终创造了一条通往失败或成功的道路。在孟加拉湾多部门技术和经济合作倡议(BIMSTEC)中,印度可以在没有巴基斯坦的情况下享受友好的环境,并确立其在南亚和东南亚的地缘政治和经济主导地位的目标,同时对抗中国的持续崛起。另一方面,在南亚区域合作联盟(南盟),巴基斯坦的不断干预意味着印度将注意力转移到其他地方充分利用其潜力。本文基于二手资料,阐述了主要参与者(印度)的利益如何影响两个类似区域组织(南盟和BIMSTEC)的发展道路,尽管这些组织具有相同的成员国、相同的社会经济状况和相同的愿景等特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Interests and Ideas of a Dominant Actor Make a Big Difference: Analyzing India's Role in SAARC and BIMSTEC.

States always function as rational actors as protecting the national interests of a state depends on the choices it makes in the international context. Hence, choices and preferences are central to the study of both public policy and international relations. Policies are driven and influenced by the attention and behaviors of the actors which ultimately create a path to failure or success. In the Bay of Bengal Initiatives for Multisectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC), India, in the absence of Pakistan, can enjoy a friendly environment and establish its goal of geopolitical and economic dominance in South Asia and Southeast Asia, while countering China's continuous upsurge. On the other hand, in the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), constant intervention from Pakistan means that India shifts its attention to use its full potential elsewhere. This article is based on secondary sources and illustrates how the interests of a major actor (India) can shape the paths of two similar regional organizations (SAARC and BIMSTEC), despite these organizations sharing characteristics such as the same member states, the same socio-economic situation, and the same vision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: This journal aims to publish original and cutting-edge research in all areas of political science, such as political theory, comparative politics, international relations, public administration, public policy, methodology, and Chinese politics and government. In the meantime it also provides a major and visible platform for the intellectual dialogue between Chinese and international scholars, and disseminate scholarship that can shed light on the ever changing field of Chinese political studies, stimulate reflective discourse as the field continues to develop both within and outside China. All research articles published in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review. In additional original research articles, Chinese Political Science Review also publishes book reviews to disseminate comprehensive reviews of emerging topics in all areas of political science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信