Akihiro Nagoya, R. Kanzaki, K. Kimura, Eriko Fukui, T. Kanou, N. Ose, S. Funaki, M. Minami, M. Fujii, Y. Shintani
{"title":"应用手术Apgar评分预测非小细胞肺癌手术患者的短期和长期预后","authors":"Akihiro Nagoya, R. Kanzaki, K. Kimura, Eriko Fukui, T. Kanou, N. Ose, S. Funaki, M. Minami, M. Fujii, Y. Shintani","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivac150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract OBJECTIVES The surgical Apgar score (SAS) is a simple score that predicts postoperative complications based on 3 intraoperative valuables. The present study evaluated the association between the SAS and postoperative outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients who underwent surgery. METHODS A total of 585 patients who underwent lung resection were enrolled in the present study. We calculated the SAS of each patient and investigated its influence on the short- and long-term outcomes. RESULTS Postoperative complications of any grade were detected in 164 cases (28%). The morbidity rate increased with decreasing SAS. When all the patients were divided into 2 groups (SAS <7 vs ≥7), postoperative complications were observed more frequently in the SAS <7 group than in the SAS ≥7 group (41% vs 25%, P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the SAS was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications (odds ratio: 1.64 [1.03–2.61], P = 0.036). In terms of long-term outcomes, the 5-year disease-free survival (54.1% vs 73.2%, P < 0.001) and overall survival (73.8% vs 83.0%, P = 0.031) were significantly worse in the SAS <7 group than in the SAS ≥7 group. In a multivariate analysis, however, the SAS was not found to be an independent prognostic factor for either disease-free survival (hazard ratio: 1.39 [0.97–2.00], P = 0.075) or overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.90 [0.57–1.42], P = 0.642). CONCLUSIONS The SAS reflected preoperative and intraoperative characteristics and was able to stratify the morbidity rate, suggesting it to be a useful predictor of short-term outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients who undergo surgery.","PeriodicalId":13621,"journal":{"name":"Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of the surgical Apgar score for predicting the short- and long-term outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients who undergo surgery\",\"authors\":\"Akihiro Nagoya, R. Kanzaki, K. Kimura, Eriko Fukui, T. Kanou, N. Ose, S. Funaki, M. Minami, M. Fujii, Y. Shintani\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icvts/ivac150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract OBJECTIVES The surgical Apgar score (SAS) is a simple score that predicts postoperative complications based on 3 intraoperative valuables. The present study evaluated the association between the SAS and postoperative outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients who underwent surgery. METHODS A total of 585 patients who underwent lung resection were enrolled in the present study. We calculated the SAS of each patient and investigated its influence on the short- and long-term outcomes. RESULTS Postoperative complications of any grade were detected in 164 cases (28%). The morbidity rate increased with decreasing SAS. When all the patients were divided into 2 groups (SAS <7 vs ≥7), postoperative complications were observed more frequently in the SAS <7 group than in the SAS ≥7 group (41% vs 25%, P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the SAS was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications (odds ratio: 1.64 [1.03–2.61], P = 0.036). In terms of long-term outcomes, the 5-year disease-free survival (54.1% vs 73.2%, P < 0.001) and overall survival (73.8% vs 83.0%, P = 0.031) were significantly worse in the SAS <7 group than in the SAS ≥7 group. In a multivariate analysis, however, the SAS was not found to be an independent prognostic factor for either disease-free survival (hazard ratio: 1.39 [0.97–2.00], P = 0.075) or overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.90 [0.57–1.42], P = 0.642). CONCLUSIONS The SAS reflected preoperative and intraoperative characteristics and was able to stratify the morbidity rate, suggesting it to be a useful predictor of short-term outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients who undergo surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivac150\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivac150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的外科Apgar评分(SAS)是一种基于3项术中价值预测术后并发症的简单评分。本研究评估了接受手术的非小细胞肺癌患者的SAS与术后预后之间的关系。方法本研究共纳入585例行肺切除术的患者。我们计算了每位患者的SAS,并研究了其对短期和长期预后的影响。结果164例(28%)术后出现不同程度的并发症。发病率随SAS的降低而升高。将所有患者分为2组(SAS <7 vs≥7),SAS <7组术后并发症发生率高于SAS≥7组(41% vs 25%, P < 0.001)。在多因素分析中,SAS是术后并发症的独立危险因素(优势比:1.64 [1.03-2.61],P = 0.036)。在长期结局方面,SAS <7组的5年无病生存率(54.1% vs 73.2%, P < 0.001)和总生存率(73.8% vs 83.0%, P = 0.031)显著低于SAS≥7组。然而,在多变量分析中,SAS并不是无病生存(风险比:1.39 [0.97-2.00],P = 0.075)或总生存(风险比:0.90 [0.57-1.42],P = 0.642)的独立预后因素。结论:SAS反映了术前和术中特征,能够对发病率进行分层,表明它是非小细胞肺癌手术患者短期预后的有效预测指标。
Utility of the surgical Apgar score for predicting the short- and long-term outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients who undergo surgery
Abstract OBJECTIVES The surgical Apgar score (SAS) is a simple score that predicts postoperative complications based on 3 intraoperative valuables. The present study evaluated the association between the SAS and postoperative outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients who underwent surgery. METHODS A total of 585 patients who underwent lung resection were enrolled in the present study. We calculated the SAS of each patient and investigated its influence on the short- and long-term outcomes. RESULTS Postoperative complications of any grade were detected in 164 cases (28%). The morbidity rate increased with decreasing SAS. When all the patients were divided into 2 groups (SAS <7 vs ≥7), postoperative complications were observed more frequently in the SAS <7 group than in the SAS ≥7 group (41% vs 25%, P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the SAS was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications (odds ratio: 1.64 [1.03–2.61], P = 0.036). In terms of long-term outcomes, the 5-year disease-free survival (54.1% vs 73.2%, P < 0.001) and overall survival (73.8% vs 83.0%, P = 0.031) were significantly worse in the SAS <7 group than in the SAS ≥7 group. In a multivariate analysis, however, the SAS was not found to be an independent prognostic factor for either disease-free survival (hazard ratio: 1.39 [0.97–2.00], P = 0.075) or overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.90 [0.57–1.42], P = 0.642). CONCLUSIONS The SAS reflected preoperative and intraoperative characteristics and was able to stratify the morbidity rate, suggesting it to be a useful predictor of short-term outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients who undergo surgery.
期刊介绍:
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery (ICVTS) publishes scientific contributions in the field of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, covering all aspects of surgery of the heart, vessels and the chest. The journal publishes a range of article types including: Best Evidence Topics; Brief Communications; Case Reports; Original Articles; State-of-the-Art; Work in Progress Report.