将来时后ἄν在Isokrates

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Emanuel Zingg
{"title":"将来时后ἄν在Isokrates","authors":"Emanuel Zingg","doi":"10.5167/UZH-136528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article deals with two questions: 1) Is ἄν with future tense attested in classical Greek prose? 2) If it is attested, what is its meaning? The history of research from antiquity until present times shows that opinions on these questions were divided. Today, the construction is widely rejected by both authors of grammars and editors of classical Greek prose texts. A new collation of all independent manuscripts of Isocratesʼ works leads to a more precise and more differentiated picture: there are passages where ἄν with future tense is to be rejected, but there are also passages where we should accept it on stemmatic and semantic grounds. In Isocrates, ἄν with future tense expresses a reserved and polite assumption about a future event. Formally and semantically, the construction stands between the potential optative with ἄν and the future without ἄν. I suggest to call it conjective.","PeriodicalId":43767,"journal":{"name":"GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Futur nach ἄν bei Isokrates\",\"authors\":\"Emanuel Zingg\",\"doi\":\"10.5167/UZH-136528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article deals with two questions: 1) Is ἄν with future tense attested in classical Greek prose? 2) If it is attested, what is its meaning? The history of research from antiquity until present times shows that opinions on these questions were divided. Today, the construction is widely rejected by both authors of grammars and editors of classical Greek prose texts. A new collation of all independent manuscripts of Isocratesʼ works leads to a more precise and more differentiated picture: there are passages where ἄν with future tense is to be rejected, but there are also passages where we should accept it on stemmatic and semantic grounds. In Isocrates, ἄν with future tense expresses a reserved and polite assumption about a future event. Formally and semantically, the construction stands between the potential optative with ἄν and the future without ἄν. I suggest to call it conjective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-136528\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-136528","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文主要探讨两个问题:1)古希腊古典散文中是否存在带将来时的ν ?2)如果得到证实,它的意义是什么?从古代到现在的研究历史表明,对这些问题的看法是分歧的。今天,这种结构被语法作者和古典希腊散文文本的编辑广泛拒绝。对伊索克拉底作品的所有独立手稿进行了新的整理,得出了一个更精确、更有区别的结论:有些段落中,带将来时的ν应该被拒绝,但也有一些段落,我们应该在系统和语义的基础上接受它。在伊索克拉底语中,带将来时的ν表示对未来事件的保留和礼貌的假设。在形式上和语义上,该构式介于带ν的潜在选择词和不带ν的将来式之间。我建议把它叫做“连词”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Futur nach ἄν bei Isokrates
Abstract This article deals with two questions: 1) Is ἄν with future tense attested in classical Greek prose? 2) If it is attested, what is its meaning? The history of research from antiquity until present times shows that opinions on these questions were divided. Today, the construction is widely rejected by both authors of grammars and editors of classical Greek prose texts. A new collation of all independent manuscripts of Isocratesʼ works leads to a more precise and more differentiated picture: there are passages where ἄν with future tense is to be rejected, but there are also passages where we should accept it on stemmatic and semantic grounds. In Isocrates, ἄν with future tense expresses a reserved and polite assumption about a future event. Formally and semantically, the construction stands between the potential optative with ἄν and the future without ἄν. I suggest to call it conjective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift erscheint seit 1909 in zwangloser Folge. Vor allem sprachgeschichtliche, strukturelle und etymologische Untersuchungen werden publiziert; Beiträge in deutscher oder englischer Sprache.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信