约旦典型干旱区灌溉条件下3个橄榄品种产油量、化学和感官特性受采收方式和日期的影响

Hala Alfrriyeh, K. Al-Absi, S. Ayoub
{"title":"约旦典型干旱区灌溉条件下3个橄榄品种产油量、化学和感官特性受采收方式和日期的影响","authors":"Hala Alfrriyeh, K. Al-Absi, S. Ayoub","doi":"10.35516/jjas.v18i4.807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experiment was conducted to investigate the influence of harvesting method and harvesting date on the quality and quantity of three olive genotypes. Olive fruits of cultivars \"Ayvalik\", \"Grossa de Spain\" and \"Nabali\" were harvested on October 20 and November 13, 2017, using hand and mechanical (by combs) harvesting methods. Olive fruits were pressed then, olive oil samples were analyzed for acidity, peroxide value, refractive index, olive oil percentage, and sensory properties. The results showed that the harvesting method did not significantly affect oil quantity and chemical analysis, but affected sensory properties of olive oil, where the harvesting method by hand gave the highest (fruity, bitter, and pungent) and the lowest negative attributes (fusty, musty and rancid). Furthermore, as ripening progressed, there was an increase in olive oil percentage, oil acidity and peroxide value. The positive attributes (fruity, bitter and pungent) were significantly decreased while negative attributes (fusty, musty and rancid) were increased as ripening progressed. On the contrary, the refractive index (at 25°C) remains almost constant. The response of olive cultivars to harvesting was inconstant and did not respond similarly, \"Ayvalik\" had the highest acidity and peroxide value, while \"Grossa de Spain\" had the highest oil percentage. In addition, \"Nabali\" had the highest positive attributes. The lowest acidity, peroxide value and negative attributes were obtained for \"Nabali\". The result proved that olive cultivars and harvesting date and method combine together to influence acidity, peroxide value and sensory properties (fusty, musty, rancid, fruity, and bitter) of olive oil.","PeriodicalId":14707,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oil Quantity, Chemical and Organoleptic Properties of Three Olive Cultivars Grown under Irrigation at a Typical Arid Region in Jordan as Influenced by Harvesting Method and Date\",\"authors\":\"Hala Alfrriyeh, K. Al-Absi, S. Ayoub\",\"doi\":\"10.35516/jjas.v18i4.807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An experiment was conducted to investigate the influence of harvesting method and harvesting date on the quality and quantity of three olive genotypes. Olive fruits of cultivars \\\"Ayvalik\\\", \\\"Grossa de Spain\\\" and \\\"Nabali\\\" were harvested on October 20 and November 13, 2017, using hand and mechanical (by combs) harvesting methods. Olive fruits were pressed then, olive oil samples were analyzed for acidity, peroxide value, refractive index, olive oil percentage, and sensory properties. The results showed that the harvesting method did not significantly affect oil quantity and chemical analysis, but affected sensory properties of olive oil, where the harvesting method by hand gave the highest (fruity, bitter, and pungent) and the lowest negative attributes (fusty, musty and rancid). Furthermore, as ripening progressed, there was an increase in olive oil percentage, oil acidity and peroxide value. The positive attributes (fruity, bitter and pungent) were significantly decreased while negative attributes (fusty, musty and rancid) were increased as ripening progressed. On the contrary, the refractive index (at 25°C) remains almost constant. The response of olive cultivars to harvesting was inconstant and did not respond similarly, \\\"Ayvalik\\\" had the highest acidity and peroxide value, while \\\"Grossa de Spain\\\" had the highest oil percentage. In addition, \\\"Nabali\\\" had the highest positive attributes. The lowest acidity, peroxide value and negative attributes were obtained for \\\"Nabali\\\". The result proved that olive cultivars and harvesting date and method combine together to influence acidity, peroxide value and sensory properties (fusty, musty, rancid, fruity, and bitter) of olive oil.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35516/jjas.v18i4.807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jjas.v18i4.807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过试验研究了采收方式和采收日期对三种橄榄基因型品质和数量的影响。品种“Ayvalik”、“Grossa de Spain”和“Nabali”的橄榄果实分别于2017年10月20日和11月13日收获,采用手工和机械(通过梳子)采摘方法。然后压榨橄榄果实,分析橄榄油样品的酸度、过氧化值、折射率、橄榄油百分比和感官特性。结果表明,采收方式对橄榄油的油量和化学分析没有显著影响,但对橄榄油的感官特性有影响,其中手工采收方式的负面属性(果味、苦味和辛辣)最高,负面属性(霉味、霉味和腐臭)最低。此外,随着成熟的进行,橄榄油的百分比、油的酸度和过氧化值都有所增加。随着成熟的进行,积极属性(果味、苦味和辛辣)显著降低,而消极属性(霉味、霉味和腐臭)显著增加。相反,折射率(在25°C时)几乎保持不变。不同橄榄品种对采收的反应不稳定且不相似,“Ayvalik”的酸度和过氧化值最高,而“Grossa de Spain”的含油量最高。此外,“Nabali”具有最高的积极属性。“纳巴利”获得了最低的酸度、过氧化值和负属性。结果表明,橄榄品种、采收日期和方法共同影响橄榄油的酸度、过氧化值和感官特性(霉味、霉味、腐臭、果味和苦味)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oil Quantity, Chemical and Organoleptic Properties of Three Olive Cultivars Grown under Irrigation at a Typical Arid Region in Jordan as Influenced by Harvesting Method and Date
An experiment was conducted to investigate the influence of harvesting method and harvesting date on the quality and quantity of three olive genotypes. Olive fruits of cultivars "Ayvalik", "Grossa de Spain" and "Nabali" were harvested on October 20 and November 13, 2017, using hand and mechanical (by combs) harvesting methods. Olive fruits were pressed then, olive oil samples were analyzed for acidity, peroxide value, refractive index, olive oil percentage, and sensory properties. The results showed that the harvesting method did not significantly affect oil quantity and chemical analysis, but affected sensory properties of olive oil, where the harvesting method by hand gave the highest (fruity, bitter, and pungent) and the lowest negative attributes (fusty, musty and rancid). Furthermore, as ripening progressed, there was an increase in olive oil percentage, oil acidity and peroxide value. The positive attributes (fruity, bitter and pungent) were significantly decreased while negative attributes (fusty, musty and rancid) were increased as ripening progressed. On the contrary, the refractive index (at 25°C) remains almost constant. The response of olive cultivars to harvesting was inconstant and did not respond similarly, "Ayvalik" had the highest acidity and peroxide value, while "Grossa de Spain" had the highest oil percentage. In addition, "Nabali" had the highest positive attributes. The lowest acidity, peroxide value and negative attributes were obtained for "Nabali". The result proved that olive cultivars and harvesting date and method combine together to influence acidity, peroxide value and sensory properties (fusty, musty, rancid, fruity, and bitter) of olive oil.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信