Mehdi Joseph-Ouni, A. White, Ian Smales, Ross Saddlier, J. Cann, W. Mccord, P. Couper, A. Amey
{"title":"来自北昆士兰尼科尔森河和格雷戈里河的淡水龟(鳖目:龟科)的进一步证据","authors":"Mehdi Joseph-Ouni, A. White, Ian Smales, Ross Saddlier, J. Cann, W. Mccord, P. Couper, A. Amey","doi":"10.17082/j.2204-1478.63.2022.2022-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thomson et al. (1997) proposed that the extant Elseya from the Nicholson-Gregory drainages in northwestern Queensland was conspecific with the holotype of Elseya lavarackorum, which comprised a fossil carapace and associated plastron excavated from the late Pleistocene Terrace Site at Riversleigh. Analysis of additional fossil material, and examination of a suite of 16 scute characters (eight for each of the carapace and plastron) by Joseph-Ouni et al. (2020) concluded that the two species were distinct and represented separate Elseya lineages and proposed the new name Elseya oneiros for the extant lineage. Recently, the Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (TTWG) in their 9th edition Checklist of Turtles of the World (TTWG 2021) questioned the status of E. oneiros and placed it in the synonymy of E. lavarackorum, making the claim, amongst others, that the skeletal characters of Thomson et al. (1997) were not addressed. Here we fully address the claims made and evaluate those skeletal characters. We also assess an additional nine thoracic skeletal characters of the pertinent Elseya species, including E. dentata sensu stricto. The results again do not support the conclusions of Thomson et al. (1997) of the holotype of Elseya lavarackorum being conspecific with the extant Elseya from the Nicholson-Gregory Rivers, reaffirms the proposal offered by Joseph-Ouni et al. (2020) for the placement of E. lavarackorum in the subgenus Elseya, and the status of E. oneiros in the Nicholson-Gregory drainages as a distinct species.","PeriodicalId":35552,"journal":{"name":"Memoirs of the Queensland Museum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Further evidence in support of the recognition of the Freshwater Turtle Elseya oneiros (Testudines: Chelidae) from the Nicholson and Gregory Rivers of Northern Queensland\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi Joseph-Ouni, A. White, Ian Smales, Ross Saddlier, J. Cann, W. Mccord, P. Couper, A. Amey\",\"doi\":\"10.17082/j.2204-1478.63.2022.2022-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thomson et al. (1997) proposed that the extant Elseya from the Nicholson-Gregory drainages in northwestern Queensland was conspecific with the holotype of Elseya lavarackorum, which comprised a fossil carapace and associated plastron excavated from the late Pleistocene Terrace Site at Riversleigh. Analysis of additional fossil material, and examination of a suite of 16 scute characters (eight for each of the carapace and plastron) by Joseph-Ouni et al. (2020) concluded that the two species were distinct and represented separate Elseya lineages and proposed the new name Elseya oneiros for the extant lineage. Recently, the Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (TTWG) in their 9th edition Checklist of Turtles of the World (TTWG 2021) questioned the status of E. oneiros and placed it in the synonymy of E. lavarackorum, making the claim, amongst others, that the skeletal characters of Thomson et al. (1997) were not addressed. Here we fully address the claims made and evaluate those skeletal characters. We also assess an additional nine thoracic skeletal characters of the pertinent Elseya species, including E. dentata sensu stricto. The results again do not support the conclusions of Thomson et al. (1997) of the holotype of Elseya lavarackorum being conspecific with the extant Elseya from the Nicholson-Gregory Rivers, reaffirms the proposal offered by Joseph-Ouni et al. (2020) for the placement of E. lavarackorum in the subgenus Elseya, and the status of E. oneiros in the Nicholson-Gregory drainages as a distinct species.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Memoirs of the Queensland Museum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Memoirs of the Queensland Museum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17082/j.2204-1478.63.2022.2022-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memoirs of the Queensland Museum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17082/j.2204-1478.63.2022.2022-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
Thomson等人(1997)提出,昆士兰州西北部Nicholson-Gregory流域现存的Elseya与Elseya lavarackorum的原型是同一类型的,后者包括从Riversleigh晚更新世阶地遗址出土的化石甲壳和伴生板。Joseph-Ouni et al.(2020)对额外的化石材料进行了分析,并对16个鳞片特征(每个甲壳和板甲各8个)进行了检查,得出结论认为这两个物种是不同的,代表了不同的爱思雅谱系,并为现存的谱系提出了新的名称Elseya oneiros。最近,海龟分类工作组(TTWG)在其第9版《世界海龟清单》(TTWG 2021)中对E. oneiros的地位提出了质疑,并将其置于E. lavarackorum的同义词中,并声称除其他外,汤姆森等人(1997)的骨骼特征没有得到解决。在这里,我们完全解决所提出的要求,并评估这些骨骼特征。我们还评估了相关Elseya物种的另外9个胸骨特征,包括E. dentata sensu stricto。研究结果再次不支持Thomson et al.(1997)的结论,即完整型的lavarackorum与现存的Nicholson-Gregory Rivers中的Elseya属同属,并重申了Joseph-Ouni et al.(2020)提出的将E. lavarackorum置于Elseya亚属中的建议,以及E. oneiros在Nicholson-Gregory流域中作为一个独特物种的地位。
Further evidence in support of the recognition of the Freshwater Turtle Elseya oneiros (Testudines: Chelidae) from the Nicholson and Gregory Rivers of Northern Queensland
Thomson et al. (1997) proposed that the extant Elseya from the Nicholson-Gregory drainages in northwestern Queensland was conspecific with the holotype of Elseya lavarackorum, which comprised a fossil carapace and associated plastron excavated from the late Pleistocene Terrace Site at Riversleigh. Analysis of additional fossil material, and examination of a suite of 16 scute characters (eight for each of the carapace and plastron) by Joseph-Ouni et al. (2020) concluded that the two species were distinct and represented separate Elseya lineages and proposed the new name Elseya oneiros for the extant lineage. Recently, the Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (TTWG) in their 9th edition Checklist of Turtles of the World (TTWG 2021) questioned the status of E. oneiros and placed it in the synonymy of E. lavarackorum, making the claim, amongst others, that the skeletal characters of Thomson et al. (1997) were not addressed. Here we fully address the claims made and evaluate those skeletal characters. We also assess an additional nine thoracic skeletal characters of the pertinent Elseya species, including E. dentata sensu stricto. The results again do not support the conclusions of Thomson et al. (1997) of the holotype of Elseya lavarackorum being conspecific with the extant Elseya from the Nicholson-Gregory Rivers, reaffirms the proposal offered by Joseph-Ouni et al. (2020) for the placement of E. lavarackorum in the subgenus Elseya, and the status of E. oneiros in the Nicholson-Gregory drainages as a distinct species.