数字风险感知:来自54个国家的证据

AJ Grotto, C. Makridis
{"title":"数字风险感知:来自54个国家的证据","authors":"AJ Grotto, C. Makridis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3711862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the digital economy has contributed substantially to productivity growth and the emergence of new forms of civic discourse and connectivity, it has also exposed consumers and businesses to various risks associated with use of digital technologies. A chorus of global policy elites regularly sounds the alarm about the growing magnitude of these risks and the urgent need for businesses and governments to respond. And yet, despite the drumbeat of warnings, policy elites regularly express deep dissatisfaction with the status quo. What explains this apparent discrepancy between elite’s demands for more cyber resilience and their political systems’ apparent failure to deliver that resilience? We believe that part of the answer may have to do with the perceptions of digital risks by ordinary individuals. Researchers who have examined cyber risk from an economic perspective have emphasized how information asymmetries and especially externalities contribute to underinvestment in cybersecurity. Our findings in this study add an additional dimension to this work: consumers underestimate risk even when the distribution of costs affects them more directly, as is the case with fraud.","PeriodicalId":13594,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems & Economics eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perception of Digital Risks: Evidence from 54 Countries\",\"authors\":\"AJ Grotto, C. Makridis\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3711862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While the digital economy has contributed substantially to productivity growth and the emergence of new forms of civic discourse and connectivity, it has also exposed consumers and businesses to various risks associated with use of digital technologies. A chorus of global policy elites regularly sounds the alarm about the growing magnitude of these risks and the urgent need for businesses and governments to respond. And yet, despite the drumbeat of warnings, policy elites regularly express deep dissatisfaction with the status quo. What explains this apparent discrepancy between elite’s demands for more cyber resilience and their political systems’ apparent failure to deliver that resilience? We believe that part of the answer may have to do with the perceptions of digital risks by ordinary individuals. Researchers who have examined cyber risk from an economic perspective have emphasized how information asymmetries and especially externalities contribute to underinvestment in cybersecurity. Our findings in this study add an additional dimension to this work: consumers underestimate risk even when the distribution of costs affects them more directly, as is the case with fraud.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems & Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems & Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3711862\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems & Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3711862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

虽然数字经济为生产力增长和新形式的公民话语和连通性的出现做出了重大贡献,但它也使消费者和企业面临与使用数字技术相关的各种风险。全球政策精英们经常齐声发出警告,称这些风险日益严重,企业和政府迫切需要做出回应。然而,尽管不断发出警告,政策精英们还是经常对现状表达深深的不满。精英们要求提高网络弹性,而他们的政治体系显然未能提供这种弹性,这两者之间的明显差异是如何解释的?我们认为,部分答案可能与普通人对数字风险的认知有关。从经济角度研究网络风险的研究人员强调了信息不对称,特别是外部性如何导致网络安全投资不足。我们在这项研究中的发现为这项工作增加了一个额外的维度:消费者低估了风险,即使成本的分配对他们的影响更直接,就像欺诈的情况一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perception of Digital Risks: Evidence from 54 Countries
While the digital economy has contributed substantially to productivity growth and the emergence of new forms of civic discourse and connectivity, it has also exposed consumers and businesses to various risks associated with use of digital technologies. A chorus of global policy elites regularly sounds the alarm about the growing magnitude of these risks and the urgent need for businesses and governments to respond. And yet, despite the drumbeat of warnings, policy elites regularly express deep dissatisfaction with the status quo. What explains this apparent discrepancy between elite’s demands for more cyber resilience and their political systems’ apparent failure to deliver that resilience? We believe that part of the answer may have to do with the perceptions of digital risks by ordinary individuals. Researchers who have examined cyber risk from an economic perspective have emphasized how information asymmetries and especially externalities contribute to underinvestment in cybersecurity. Our findings in this study add an additional dimension to this work: consumers underestimate risk even when the distribution of costs affects them more directly, as is the case with fraud.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信