世界是否存在多元性?

IF 1.6 3区工程技术 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY

Journal of Biomedical Semantics Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1093/jos/ffad002

V. Schmitt

{"title":"世界是否存在多元性?","authors":"V. Schmitt","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffad002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Indicative conditionals and configurations with neg-raising predicates have been brought up as potential candidates for constructions involving world pluralities. I argue against this hypothesis, showing that cumulativity and quantifiers targeting a plurality’s part structure cannot access the presumed world pluralities. I furthermore argue that this makes worlds special in the sense that the same tests provide evidence for pluralities in various other semantic domains.","PeriodicalId":15055,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Semantics","volume":"7 1","pages":"153-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are There Pluralities of Worlds?\",\"authors\":\"V. Schmitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jos/ffad002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Indicative conditionals and configurations with neg-raising predicates have been brought up as potential candidates for constructions involving world pluralities. I argue against this hypothesis, showing that cumulativity and quantifiers targeting a plurality’s part structure cannot access the presumed world pluralities. I furthermore argue that this makes worlds special in the sense that the same tests provide evidence for pluralities in various other semantic domains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Semantics\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"153-178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Semantics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffad002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffad002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

指示性条件句和带否定谓语的结构被提出作为涉及世界复数的结构的潜在候选者。我反对这一假设，表明累积性和量词的目标是多元化的部分结构不能进入假定的世界多元化。我进一步认为，这使得世界变得特别，因为同样的测试为其他各种语义领域的多元性提供了证据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Are There Pluralities of Worlds?

Indicative conditionals and configurations with neg-raising predicates have been brought up as potential candidates for constructions involving world pluralities. I argue against this hypothesis, showing that cumulativity and quantifiers targeting a plurality’s part structure cannot access the presumed world pluralities. I furthermore argue that this makes worlds special in the sense that the same tests provide evidence for pluralities in various other semantic domains.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Biomedical Semantics MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

5.30%

发文量

审稿时长

30 weeks

期刊介绍： Journal of Biomedical Semantics addresses issues of semantic enrichment and semantic processing in the biomedical domain. The scope of the journal covers two main areas: Infrastructure for biomedical semantics: focusing on semantic resources and repositories, meta-data management and resource description, knowledge representation and semantic frameworks, the Biomedical Semantic Web, and semantic interoperability. Semantic mining, annotation, and analysis: focusing on approaches and applications of semantic resources; and tools for investigation, reasoning, prediction, and discoveries in biomedicine.