与COVID - 19大流行相关的头痛、个人防护装备和社会心理因素

N. Magnavita, F. Chirico
{"title":"与COVID - 19大流行相关的头痛、个人防护装备和社会心理因素","authors":"N. Magnavita, F. Chirico","doi":"10.1111/head.13882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study carried out by Ong et al. is noteworthy for the high level of clinical detail and the originality of the observation. The topographical relationship between the points of skin contact of the N95 face mask as well as protective eyewear with headache is novel and suggestive, and could give indications for the technical improvement of the devices. However, this research has some weaknesses, which only subsequent investigations can clarify. In workplaces, where no pollution problems are reported, a significant share of indoor workers (6% of males, 9% of females) suffer “often, at least once a week” from headaches attributed to the working environment. This symptom is significantly associated with occupational stress. The individual characteristics of workers, in particular anxiety and depression, significantly influence the reporting of headache. Among health care workers, headache is associated with occupational stress and with sleep problems, as well as with anxiety and depression that were significantly increased during the COVID-19 pandemics. This study did not take into account these variables. This may be a major limitation because the study population was drawn from high-risk hospital areas such as isolation wards (designated as “pandemic wards”), the emergency rooms and medical intensive care unit. In these settings, workers are highly likely to experience emotional overload. The association between Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and headache could be, therefore, spurious and the real factor should be sought among the psychosocial factors associated with the pandemic. Furthermore, the study is entirely based on what workers remember of the situation before the epidemic, and this inevitably exposes to a possible recall bias. We are convinced that the association between PPE and headache is worthy of controlled longitudinal studies, which compare different types of PPE and take into account all confounding factors.","PeriodicalId":12845,"journal":{"name":"Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Headaches, Personal Protective Equipment, and Psychosocial Factors Associated With COVID‐19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"N. Magnavita, F. Chirico\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/head.13882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study carried out by Ong et al. is noteworthy for the high level of clinical detail and the originality of the observation. The topographical relationship between the points of skin contact of the N95 face mask as well as protective eyewear with headache is novel and suggestive, and could give indications for the technical improvement of the devices. However, this research has some weaknesses, which only subsequent investigations can clarify. In workplaces, where no pollution problems are reported, a significant share of indoor workers (6% of males, 9% of females) suffer “often, at least once a week” from headaches attributed to the working environment. This symptom is significantly associated with occupational stress. The individual characteristics of workers, in particular anxiety and depression, significantly influence the reporting of headache. Among health care workers, headache is associated with occupational stress and with sleep problems, as well as with anxiety and depression that were significantly increased during the COVID-19 pandemics. This study did not take into account these variables. This may be a major limitation because the study population was drawn from high-risk hospital areas such as isolation wards (designated as “pandemic wards”), the emergency rooms and medical intensive care unit. In these settings, workers are highly likely to experience emotional overload. The association between Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and headache could be, therefore, spurious and the real factor should be sought among the psychosocial factors associated with the pandemic. Furthermore, the study is entirely based on what workers remember of the situation before the epidemic, and this inevitably exposes to a possible recall bias. We are convinced that the association between PPE and headache is worthy of controlled longitudinal studies, which compare different types of PPE and take into account all confounding factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13882\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

Ong等人进行的研究因其高水平的临床细节和观察的独创性而值得注意。N95口罩与头痛防护眼镜的皮肤接触点之间的地形关系具有新颖性和启发性,可为设备的技术改进提供指示。然而,这项研究有一些弱点,只有后续的调查才能澄清。在没有污染问题报告的工作场所,很大一部分室内工作者(6%的男性,9%的女性)“经常,至少每周一次”遭受与工作环境有关的头痛。该症状与职业压力显著相关。工人的个体特征,特别是焦虑和抑郁,显著影响头痛的报告。在卫生保健工作者中,头痛与职业压力、睡眠问题以及焦虑和抑郁有关,这在COVID-19大流行期间显著增加。这项研究没有考虑到这些变量。这可能是一个主要的限制,因为研究人群来自高风险医院区域,如隔离病房(指定为“大流行病房”)、急诊室和医疗重症监护病房。在这些环境中,员工很可能会经历情绪过载。因此,个人防护装备与头痛之间的联系可能是虚假的,应该在与大流行有关的社会心理因素中寻找真正的因素。此外,这项研究完全基于工人对疫情前情况的记忆,这不可避免地会产生回忆偏差。我们确信,PPE与头痛之间的关联值得进行对照纵向研究,比较不同类型的PPE并考虑所有混杂因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Headaches, Personal Protective Equipment, and Psychosocial Factors Associated With COVID‐19 Pandemic
The study carried out by Ong et al. is noteworthy for the high level of clinical detail and the originality of the observation. The topographical relationship between the points of skin contact of the N95 face mask as well as protective eyewear with headache is novel and suggestive, and could give indications for the technical improvement of the devices. However, this research has some weaknesses, which only subsequent investigations can clarify. In workplaces, where no pollution problems are reported, a significant share of indoor workers (6% of males, 9% of females) suffer “often, at least once a week” from headaches attributed to the working environment. This symptom is significantly associated with occupational stress. The individual characteristics of workers, in particular anxiety and depression, significantly influence the reporting of headache. Among health care workers, headache is associated with occupational stress and with sleep problems, as well as with anxiety and depression that were significantly increased during the COVID-19 pandemics. This study did not take into account these variables. This may be a major limitation because the study population was drawn from high-risk hospital areas such as isolation wards (designated as “pandemic wards”), the emergency rooms and medical intensive care unit. In these settings, workers are highly likely to experience emotional overload. The association between Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and headache could be, therefore, spurious and the real factor should be sought among the psychosocial factors associated with the pandemic. Furthermore, the study is entirely based on what workers remember of the situation before the epidemic, and this inevitably exposes to a possible recall bias. We are convinced that the association between PPE and headache is worthy of controlled longitudinal studies, which compare different types of PPE and take into account all confounding factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信