你的网站合法吗?在互联网上寻找安全和良好的健康信息

Q2 Medicine
Teresa Wagner, C. Howe, Brennan Lewis, Tracine Adame
{"title":"你的网站合法吗?在互联网上寻找安全和良好的健康信息","authors":"Teresa Wagner, C. Howe, Brennan Lewis, Tracine Adame","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20220516-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There exists a paucity of literature about teenager health literacy in general and teenagers are likely to turn to the internet for health information. Therefore, they need good e-health literacy to properly understand and apply the information obtained. Yet, many have limited e-health literacy, lacking the knowledge and skills to filter and distinguish reliable from unreliable health information and searches return large amounts of information, making it difficult to recognize whether information is reputable and raising concerns regarding teenagers' safety. Brief Description of Activity: We developed a toolkit in collaboration with community-based organizations serving teenagers and teenagers themselves usable with brief training to present a 1-hour, interactive workshop. We transformed current adult information for locating and appraising online health information into a teenager friendly format using relevant health topics to engage participants. Implementation: We met teenagers in teenager-friendly settings where they already gather to engage them and leverage the relationship fostered within those settings to bridge positive and negative social determinant influences on health literacy and e-health literacy as well as cross potential cultural, economic, political, and demographic barriers. Using the “train the trainer” method to build sustainability, we trained teenagers and group leaders to use the toolkit to run workshops with teenagers and placed the components in an easily available online format. Results: After completing the workshop, teenager participants expressed a high level of confidence in using Medline Plus, locating health information online, identifying Truth versus Trash and making health decisions. Most teenagers reported they would recommend the WebLitLegit workshop to their friends and it improved their ability to find credible online health information. Lessons Learned: The workshop's practical application provided participants with real-life examples for evaluating online information using the “LEGIT” acronym. The integration of this community-based program fostered relationships between the teenager participants, community organizations, and university students and faculty. All of the organizations involved benefited through exposure to health literacy concepts and knowledge of evaluation criteria, which may help expand e-health literacy in the community because the students, teenagers, and community partners are able to sustainably share the toolkit within their social network. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2022;6(2):e151–e158.] Plain Language Summary: Teenagers use the internet to find health information but have difficulty deciding if the information is correct and safe. WebLitLegit workshops help teenagers find correct and safe information to make health decisions. Teenagers completing the workshop thought their ability to find correct information and make good health decisions improved. This best practice adds to the literature by addressing needed teenager e-health literacy.","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"21 1","pages":"e151 - e158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Your WebLitLegit? Finding Safe and Good Health Information on the Internet\",\"authors\":\"Teresa Wagner, C. Howe, Brennan Lewis, Tracine Adame\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/24748307-20220516-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: There exists a paucity of literature about teenager health literacy in general and teenagers are likely to turn to the internet for health information. Therefore, they need good e-health literacy to properly understand and apply the information obtained. Yet, many have limited e-health literacy, lacking the knowledge and skills to filter and distinguish reliable from unreliable health information and searches return large amounts of information, making it difficult to recognize whether information is reputable and raising concerns regarding teenagers' safety. Brief Description of Activity: We developed a toolkit in collaboration with community-based organizations serving teenagers and teenagers themselves usable with brief training to present a 1-hour, interactive workshop. We transformed current adult information for locating and appraising online health information into a teenager friendly format using relevant health topics to engage participants. Implementation: We met teenagers in teenager-friendly settings where they already gather to engage them and leverage the relationship fostered within those settings to bridge positive and negative social determinant influences on health literacy and e-health literacy as well as cross potential cultural, economic, political, and demographic barriers. Using the “train the trainer” method to build sustainability, we trained teenagers and group leaders to use the toolkit to run workshops with teenagers and placed the components in an easily available online format. Results: After completing the workshop, teenager participants expressed a high level of confidence in using Medline Plus, locating health information online, identifying Truth versus Trash and making health decisions. Most teenagers reported they would recommend the WebLitLegit workshop to their friends and it improved their ability to find credible online health information. Lessons Learned: The workshop's practical application provided participants with real-life examples for evaluating online information using the “LEGIT” acronym. The integration of this community-based program fostered relationships between the teenager participants, community organizations, and university students and faculty. All of the organizations involved benefited through exposure to health literacy concepts and knowledge of evaluation criteria, which may help expand e-health literacy in the community because the students, teenagers, and community partners are able to sustainably share the toolkit within their social network. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2022;6(2):e151–e158.] Plain Language Summary: Teenagers use the internet to find health information but have difficulty deciding if the information is correct and safe. WebLitLegit workshops help teenagers find correct and safe information to make health decisions. Teenagers completing the workshop thought their ability to find correct information and make good health decisions improved. This best practice adds to the literature by addressing needed teenager e-health literacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health literacy research and practice\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"e151 - e158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health literacy research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20220516-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health literacy research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20220516-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于青少年健康素养的文献普遍缺乏,青少年很可能转向互联网获取健康信息。因此,他们需要良好的电子卫生素养,以正确理解和应用所获得的信息。然而,许多人的电子保健知识有限,缺乏过滤和区分可靠和不可靠健康信息的知识和技能,搜索返回大量信息,使得难以识别信息是否可靠,并引起对青少年安全的担忧。活动简介:我们与社区组织合作开发了一个工具包,为青少年和青少年提供简短的培训,提供一个1小时的互动研讨会。我们将当前用于定位和评估在线健康信息的成人信息转换为青少年友好的格式,使用相关的健康主题来吸引参与者。实施:我们在对青少年友好的环境中会见了青少年,他们已经聚集在一起,与他们接触,并利用在这些环境中培养的关系,弥合对卫生知识普及和电子卫生知识普及的积极和消极的社会决定因素影响,以及跨越潜在的文化、经济、政治和人口障碍。通过“培训培训师”的方法来建立可持续性,我们培训青少年和小组领导使用工具包与青少年一起举办研讨会,并将组件放在易于获取的在线格式中。结果:在完成工作坊后,青少年参与者在使用Medline Plus、在线定位健康信息、识别真相与垃圾以及做出健康决定方面表现出高度的信心。大多数青少年报告说,他们会向朋友推荐WebLitLegit研讨会,它提高了他们在网上找到可靠健康信息的能力。经验教训:讲习班的实际应用为与会者提供了使用“LEGIT”首字母缩略词评估在线信息的现实例子。这个以社区为基础的项目的整合促进了青少年参与者、社区组织以及大学生和教师之间的关系。所有参与的组织都因了解卫生扫盲概念和评价标准知识而受益,这可能有助于扩大社区的电子卫生扫盲,因为学生、青少年和社区伙伴能够在其社会网络内持续地分享工具包。健康素养研究与实践[j] .中国医学工程学报,2010;6(2):1151 - 1158。[英语泛读文摘青少年利用互联网寻找健康信息,但他们很难判断这些信息是否正确和安全。WebLitLegit研讨会帮助青少年找到正确和安全的信息来做出健康决定。参加完讲习班的青少年认为,他们找到正确信息和做出良好健康决定的能力有所提高。这一最佳做法通过解决青少年需要的电子卫生知识问题,为文献增添了内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Your WebLitLegit? Finding Safe and Good Health Information on the Internet
Background: There exists a paucity of literature about teenager health literacy in general and teenagers are likely to turn to the internet for health information. Therefore, they need good e-health literacy to properly understand and apply the information obtained. Yet, many have limited e-health literacy, lacking the knowledge and skills to filter and distinguish reliable from unreliable health information and searches return large amounts of information, making it difficult to recognize whether information is reputable and raising concerns regarding teenagers' safety. Brief Description of Activity: We developed a toolkit in collaboration with community-based organizations serving teenagers and teenagers themselves usable with brief training to present a 1-hour, interactive workshop. We transformed current adult information for locating and appraising online health information into a teenager friendly format using relevant health topics to engage participants. Implementation: We met teenagers in teenager-friendly settings where they already gather to engage them and leverage the relationship fostered within those settings to bridge positive and negative social determinant influences on health literacy and e-health literacy as well as cross potential cultural, economic, political, and demographic barriers. Using the “train the trainer” method to build sustainability, we trained teenagers and group leaders to use the toolkit to run workshops with teenagers and placed the components in an easily available online format. Results: After completing the workshop, teenager participants expressed a high level of confidence in using Medline Plus, locating health information online, identifying Truth versus Trash and making health decisions. Most teenagers reported they would recommend the WebLitLegit workshop to their friends and it improved their ability to find credible online health information. Lessons Learned: The workshop's practical application provided participants with real-life examples for evaluating online information using the “LEGIT” acronym. The integration of this community-based program fostered relationships between the teenager participants, community organizations, and university students and faculty. All of the organizations involved benefited through exposure to health literacy concepts and knowledge of evaluation criteria, which may help expand e-health literacy in the community because the students, teenagers, and community partners are able to sustainably share the toolkit within their social network. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2022;6(2):e151–e158.] Plain Language Summary: Teenagers use the internet to find health information but have difficulty deciding if the information is correct and safe. WebLitLegit workshops help teenagers find correct and safe information to make health decisions. Teenagers completing the workshop thought their ability to find correct information and make good health decisions improved. This best practice adds to the literature by addressing needed teenager e-health literacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health literacy research and practice
Health literacy research and practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信