机器人团队的远程操作:基于手柄、移动设备和手部跟踪的用户界面的比较

Stefano Bonaiuto, Alberto Cannavò, Giovanni Piumatti, G. Paravati, F. Lamberti
{"title":"机器人团队的远程操作:基于手柄、移动设备和手部跟踪的用户界面的比较","authors":"Stefano Bonaiuto, Alberto Cannavò, Giovanni Piumatti, G. Paravati, F. Lamberti","doi":"10.1109/COMPSAC.2017.278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the continuous advancements made in robot technologies, the development of intuitive and effective user interfaces for human-robot interaction is getting increasingly important. This paper investigates how different types of interfaces can be used for allowing a single operator to remotely control a team of robots endowed with different capabilities. Attention is focused on three user interfaces based on a gamepad, on a mobile device and on hand tracking, respectively. To evaluate pros and cons of the above interfaces, a user study was conducted, in which participants had to combine the capabilities of a rover, a drone and a robotic arm in order to carry out a search and pick task. Based on the experiments, the fastest way to complete the task was to use the mobile device. However, results showed that some of the interfaces could provide better performances for selected robots and associated sub-tasks. It is worth observing that, despite evidences about efficiency, participants rated the gamepad as the preferred interface from the point of view of subjective usability.","PeriodicalId":6556,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)","volume":"41 1","pages":"555-560"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tele-operation of Robot Teams: A Comparison of Gamepad-, Mobile Device and Hand Tracking-Based User Interfaces\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Bonaiuto, Alberto Cannavò, Giovanni Piumatti, G. Paravati, F. Lamberti\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMPSAC.2017.278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the continuous advancements made in robot technologies, the development of intuitive and effective user interfaces for human-robot interaction is getting increasingly important. This paper investigates how different types of interfaces can be used for allowing a single operator to remotely control a team of robots endowed with different capabilities. Attention is focused on three user interfaces based on a gamepad, on a mobile device and on hand tracking, respectively. To evaluate pros and cons of the above interfaces, a user study was conducted, in which participants had to combine the capabilities of a rover, a drone and a robotic arm in order to carry out a search and pick task. Based on the experiments, the fastest way to complete the task was to use the mobile device. However, results showed that some of the interfaces could provide better performances for selected robots and associated sub-tasks. It is worth observing that, despite evidences about efficiency, participants rated the gamepad as the preferred interface from the point of view of subjective usability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"555-560\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2017.278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2017.278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

由于机器人技术的不断进步,开发直观有效的人机交互用户界面变得越来越重要。本文研究了如何使用不同类型的接口来允许单个操作员远程控制具有不同功能的机器人团队。我们的注意力分别集中在基于游戏手柄、移动设备和手部追踪的三种用户界面上。为了评估上述界面的优缺点,进行了一项用户研究,其中参与者必须结合漫游车,无人机和机械臂的能力来执行搜索和挑选任务。根据实验,最快完成任务的方法是使用移动设备。然而,结果表明,一些接口可以为选定的机器人和相关的子任务提供更好的性能。值得注意的是,尽管有关于效率的证据,但从主观可用性的角度来看,参与者将手柄评为首选界面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tele-operation of Robot Teams: A Comparison of Gamepad-, Mobile Device and Hand Tracking-Based User Interfaces
Due to the continuous advancements made in robot technologies, the development of intuitive and effective user interfaces for human-robot interaction is getting increasingly important. This paper investigates how different types of interfaces can be used for allowing a single operator to remotely control a team of robots endowed with different capabilities. Attention is focused on three user interfaces based on a gamepad, on a mobile device and on hand tracking, respectively. To evaluate pros and cons of the above interfaces, a user study was conducted, in which participants had to combine the capabilities of a rover, a drone and a robotic arm in order to carry out a search and pick task. Based on the experiments, the fastest way to complete the task was to use the mobile device. However, results showed that some of the interfaces could provide better performances for selected robots and associated sub-tasks. It is worth observing that, despite evidences about efficiency, participants rated the gamepad as the preferred interface from the point of view of subjective usability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信