工程学院发展:超越唱诗班的布道。

R. Brent, R. Felder
{"title":"工程学院发展:超越唱诗班的布道。","authors":"R. Brent, R. Felder","doi":"10.18260/1-2--7126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A reform movement has been active in higher education for several decades. The proponents of change argue that the traditional teacher-centered approach to classroom instruction, which emphasizes lecturing, individual effort, and competition for grades, is not particularly effective for promoting learning and skill development. They claim that a more balanced approach incorporating active, inductive (discovery), and cooperative learning improves the chances of achieving almost every conceivable educational objective, including depth of learning, length of information retention, development of problem-solving, communication, and teamwork skills, attitudes toward subjects and increased motivation to learn them, and self-confidence. They offer an impressive array of learning theory-based and classroom research results to support these claims.","PeriodicalId":90982,"journal":{"name":"The journal of faculty development","volume":"10 1","pages":"73-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engineering Faculty Development: Getting the Sermon beyond the Choir.\",\"authors\":\"R. Brent, R. Felder\",\"doi\":\"10.18260/1-2--7126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A reform movement has been active in higher education for several decades. The proponents of change argue that the traditional teacher-centered approach to classroom instruction, which emphasizes lecturing, individual effort, and competition for grades, is not particularly effective for promoting learning and skill development. They claim that a more balanced approach incorporating active, inductive (discovery), and cooperative learning improves the chances of achieving almost every conceivable educational objective, including depth of learning, length of information retention, development of problem-solving, communication, and teamwork skills, attitudes toward subjects and increased motivation to learn them, and self-confidence. They offer an impressive array of learning theory-based and classroom research results to support these claims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of faculty development\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"73-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of faculty development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--7126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of faculty development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--7126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

高等教育改革运动已经活跃了几十年。变革的支持者认为,传统的以教师为中心的课堂教学方式,强调讲课、个人努力和分数竞争,对促进学习和技能发展并不是特别有效。他们声称,结合主动、归纳(发现)和合作学习的更平衡的方法可以提高实现几乎所有可想象的教育目标的机会,包括学习的深度、信息保留的长度、解决问题、沟通和团队合作技能的发展、对学科的态度和学习动机的增加,以及自信。他们提供了一系列令人印象深刻的学习理论和课堂研究结果来支持这些说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engineering Faculty Development: Getting the Sermon beyond the Choir.
A reform movement has been active in higher education for several decades. The proponents of change argue that the traditional teacher-centered approach to classroom instruction, which emphasizes lecturing, individual effort, and competition for grades, is not particularly effective for promoting learning and skill development. They claim that a more balanced approach incorporating active, inductive (discovery), and cooperative learning improves the chances of achieving almost every conceivable educational objective, including depth of learning, length of information retention, development of problem-solving, communication, and teamwork skills, attitudes toward subjects and increased motivation to learn them, and self-confidence. They offer an impressive array of learning theory-based and classroom research results to support these claims.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信