国际非专利名称处方在一家专门的公立医院在埃及

Waad O Mahmoud Soliman, A. Shehata, R. Mosallam
{"title":"国际非专利名称处方在一家专门的公立医院在埃及","authors":"Waad O Mahmoud Soliman, A. Shehata, R. Mosallam","doi":"10.1177/17411343221091182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: International Nonproprietary Names (INN) is prescribing the name of the active ingredient. Objective: This study aimed to investigate INN prescription rates and perceived barriers towards INN prescribing at a public Ministry of Health and Population (MOHP) hospital specialized in treating infectious diseases in Egypt. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted in a 280-bed specialized Ministry of Health Hospital in Alexandria, Egypt. Medications were described either as brand or generic based on WHO Essential Medicines List (EML) classification system and the Egyptian National Formulary. All physicians with prescribing authority in study hospital were administered a questionnaire composed of two sections. The first section explored the socio-demographic and work characteristics of the physicians, and the second section listed the barriers towards INN prescription. Results: Out of the 400 medical records reviewed, 2279 drugs were prescribed. About half of the medications (52.61%) were prescribed in INN. The medicines which were most frequently prescribed in INN were electrolytes solution (99.5%), laxatives (98.6%), and vitamins and minerals (85.2%) and coagulation medicines (82%). Other medications were exclusively prescribed in brand names as antispasmodics, antidiarrheal, dermatology and vascular insufficiency medications. Only 38.75% were trained using INNs to designate medications, about half of physicians (48%) reported that they rarely use INNs in their practice. The most frequently listed reasons for not prescribing in INN prescribing perceived by physicians were physicians being not familiar with INN (79.0%), doubts about the efficacy, safety, or quality of generic drugs (52.0%) and absence of educational programs regarding INN use (47.0%). Conclusion and Relevance: The current study illustrates only half of the prescriptions are prescribed using INN. A multifaceted approach using explicit policy for obligating INN prescription, together with educational sessions for physicians about the value of INN prescription and the bioequivalence of generic medications to their brand counterparts.","PeriodicalId":15914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Generic Medicines: The Business Journal for the Generic Medicines Sector","volume":"12 1","pages":"223 - 232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Nonproprietary Names prescription in a specialized public hospital in Egypt\",\"authors\":\"Waad O Mahmoud Soliman, A. Shehata, R. Mosallam\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17411343221091182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: International Nonproprietary Names (INN) is prescribing the name of the active ingredient. Objective: This study aimed to investigate INN prescription rates and perceived barriers towards INN prescribing at a public Ministry of Health and Population (MOHP) hospital specialized in treating infectious diseases in Egypt. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted in a 280-bed specialized Ministry of Health Hospital in Alexandria, Egypt. Medications were described either as brand or generic based on WHO Essential Medicines List (EML) classification system and the Egyptian National Formulary. All physicians with prescribing authority in study hospital were administered a questionnaire composed of two sections. The first section explored the socio-demographic and work characteristics of the physicians, and the second section listed the barriers towards INN prescription. Results: Out of the 400 medical records reviewed, 2279 drugs were prescribed. About half of the medications (52.61%) were prescribed in INN. The medicines which were most frequently prescribed in INN were electrolytes solution (99.5%), laxatives (98.6%), and vitamins and minerals (85.2%) and coagulation medicines (82%). Other medications were exclusively prescribed in brand names as antispasmodics, antidiarrheal, dermatology and vascular insufficiency medications. Only 38.75% were trained using INNs to designate medications, about half of physicians (48%) reported that they rarely use INNs in their practice. The most frequently listed reasons for not prescribing in INN prescribing perceived by physicians were physicians being not familiar with INN (79.0%), doubts about the efficacy, safety, or quality of generic drugs (52.0%) and absence of educational programs regarding INN use (47.0%). Conclusion and Relevance: The current study illustrates only half of the prescriptions are prescribed using INN. A multifaceted approach using explicit policy for obligating INN prescription, together with educational sessions for physicians about the value of INN prescription and the bioequivalence of generic medications to their brand counterparts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Generic Medicines: The Business Journal for the Generic Medicines Sector\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"223 - 232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Generic Medicines: The Business Journal for the Generic Medicines Sector\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17411343221091182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Generic Medicines: The Business Journal for the Generic Medicines Sector","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17411343221091182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国际非专利名称(INN)规定了活性成分的名称。目的:本研究旨在调查埃及卫生和人口部(MOHP)专门治疗传染病的公共医院的非处方药处方率和对非处方药处方的感知障碍。方法:对埃及亚历山大市一家拥有280张床位的卫生部专科医院进行回顾性图表分析。根据世卫组织基本药物清单(EML)分类系统和埃及国家处方集,将药物描述为品牌或仿制药。研究医院所有具有开处方权的医生都接受了一份由两部分组成的问卷调查。第一部分探讨了医生的社会人口特征和工作特征,第二部分列出了INN处方的障碍。结果:在审查的400份医疗记录中,处方药物2279种。约有一半(52.61%)的药物是在医院处方的。非住院医院最常见的处方药物为电解质溶液(99.5%)、泻药(98.6%)、维生素和矿物质(85.2%)和凝血药(82%)。其他药物仅以品牌名称开处方,如抗痉挛药、止泻药、皮肤病和血管功能不全药物。只有38.75%的医生接受过使用INNs指定药物的培训,大约一半的医生(48%)报告说他们在实践中很少使用INNs。医生认为不开非专利药物处方最常见的原因是医生不熟悉非专利药物(79.0%)、怀疑仿制药的疗效、安全性或质量(52.0%)和缺乏有关非专利药物使用的教育计划(47.0%)。结论和相关性:目前的研究表明,只有一半的处方是使用非处方性药物开的。这是一种多方面的方法,使用明确的政策来强制执行非专利药物处方,同时对医生进行关于非专利药物处方的价值和仿制药与品牌药的生物等效性的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International Nonproprietary Names prescription in a specialized public hospital in Egypt
Background: International Nonproprietary Names (INN) is prescribing the name of the active ingredient. Objective: This study aimed to investigate INN prescription rates and perceived barriers towards INN prescribing at a public Ministry of Health and Population (MOHP) hospital specialized in treating infectious diseases in Egypt. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted in a 280-bed specialized Ministry of Health Hospital in Alexandria, Egypt. Medications were described either as brand or generic based on WHO Essential Medicines List (EML) classification system and the Egyptian National Formulary. All physicians with prescribing authority in study hospital were administered a questionnaire composed of two sections. The first section explored the socio-demographic and work characteristics of the physicians, and the second section listed the barriers towards INN prescription. Results: Out of the 400 medical records reviewed, 2279 drugs were prescribed. About half of the medications (52.61%) were prescribed in INN. The medicines which were most frequently prescribed in INN were electrolytes solution (99.5%), laxatives (98.6%), and vitamins and minerals (85.2%) and coagulation medicines (82%). Other medications were exclusively prescribed in brand names as antispasmodics, antidiarrheal, dermatology and vascular insufficiency medications. Only 38.75% were trained using INNs to designate medications, about half of physicians (48%) reported that they rarely use INNs in their practice. The most frequently listed reasons for not prescribing in INN prescribing perceived by physicians were physicians being not familiar with INN (79.0%), doubts about the efficacy, safety, or quality of generic drugs (52.0%) and absence of educational programs regarding INN use (47.0%). Conclusion and Relevance: The current study illustrates only half of the prescriptions are prescribed using INN. A multifaceted approach using explicit policy for obligating INN prescription, together with educational sessions for physicians about the value of INN prescription and the bioequivalence of generic medications to their brand counterparts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信