通过锁预获取修复死锁

Yan Cai, Lingwei Cao
{"title":"通过锁预获取修复死锁","authors":"Yan Cai, Lingwei Cao","doi":"10.1145/2884781.2884819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Manual deadlock fixing is error-prone and time-consuming. Exist-ing generic approach (GA) simply inserts gate locks to fix dead-locks by serializing executions, which could introduce various new deadlocks and incur high runtime overhead. We propose a novel approach DFixer to fix deadlocks without introducing any new deadlocks by design. DFixer only selects one thread of a deadlock to pre-acquire a lock w together with another lock h, where before fixing, the deadlock occurs when the thread holds lock h and waits for lock w. As such, DFixer eliminates a hold-and-wait necessary condition, preventing the deadlock from occurring. The thread per-forming pre-acquisition is carefully selected such that no other syn-chronization exists in between the two original acquisitions. Other-wise, DFixer further introduces a context-aware conditional protect-ed by above lock w to guarantee the correctness of DFixer. The evaluation is on 20 deadlocks, including 17 from widely-used real-world C/C++ programs. It shows that DFixer successfully fixed all deadlocks. Whereas GA introduced 9 new deadlocks; a latest work Grail failed to fix 8 deadlocks and introduced 3 new deadlocks on others. On average, DFixer incurred only 2.1% overhead, where GA and Grail incurred 15.8% and 11.5% overhead, respectively.","PeriodicalId":6485,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM 38th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","volume":"40 1","pages":"1109-1120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fixing Deadlocks via Lock Pre-Acquisitions\",\"authors\":\"Yan Cai, Lingwei Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2884781.2884819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Manual deadlock fixing is error-prone and time-consuming. Exist-ing generic approach (GA) simply inserts gate locks to fix dead-locks by serializing executions, which could introduce various new deadlocks and incur high runtime overhead. We propose a novel approach DFixer to fix deadlocks without introducing any new deadlocks by design. DFixer only selects one thread of a deadlock to pre-acquire a lock w together with another lock h, where before fixing, the deadlock occurs when the thread holds lock h and waits for lock w. As such, DFixer eliminates a hold-and-wait necessary condition, preventing the deadlock from occurring. The thread per-forming pre-acquisition is carefully selected such that no other syn-chronization exists in between the two original acquisitions. Other-wise, DFixer further introduces a context-aware conditional protect-ed by above lock w to guarantee the correctness of DFixer. The evaluation is on 20 deadlocks, including 17 from widely-used real-world C/C++ programs. It shows that DFixer successfully fixed all deadlocks. Whereas GA introduced 9 new deadlocks; a latest work Grail failed to fix 8 deadlocks and introduced 3 new deadlocks on others. On average, DFixer incurred only 2.1% overhead, where GA and Grail incurred 15.8% and 11.5% overhead, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM 38th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"1109-1120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM 38th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2884781.2884819\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM 38th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2884781.2884819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

手动修复死锁容易出错且耗时。现有的通用方法(GA)只是通过序列化执行来插入门锁来修复死锁,这可能会引入各种新的死锁,并导致高运行时开销。我们提出了一种新颖的方法DFixer来修复死锁,而不会在设计上引入任何新的死锁。DFixer只选择死锁的一个线程来预先获取锁w和另一个锁h,在固定之前,当线程持有锁h并等待锁w时发生死锁。因此,DFixer消除了持有和等待的必要条件,防止死锁发生。线程执行的预获取是经过仔细选择的,这样在两个原始获取之间就不会存在其他同步。否则,DFixer进一步引入了一个上下文感知的条件,该条件由上述锁w保护,以保证DFixer的正确性。对20个死锁进行了评估,其中17个来自现实世界中广泛使用的C/ c++程序。它显示DFixer成功地修复了所有死锁。而GA引入了9个新的死锁;最近的一个工作Grail未能修复8个死锁,并在其他的死锁上引入了3个新的死锁。DFixer平均只产生2.1%的开销,而GA和Grail分别产生15.8%和11.5%的开销。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fixing Deadlocks via Lock Pre-Acquisitions
Manual deadlock fixing is error-prone and time-consuming. Exist-ing generic approach (GA) simply inserts gate locks to fix dead-locks by serializing executions, which could introduce various new deadlocks and incur high runtime overhead. We propose a novel approach DFixer to fix deadlocks without introducing any new deadlocks by design. DFixer only selects one thread of a deadlock to pre-acquire a lock w together with another lock h, where before fixing, the deadlock occurs when the thread holds lock h and waits for lock w. As such, DFixer eliminates a hold-and-wait necessary condition, preventing the deadlock from occurring. The thread per-forming pre-acquisition is carefully selected such that no other syn-chronization exists in between the two original acquisitions. Other-wise, DFixer further introduces a context-aware conditional protect-ed by above lock w to guarantee the correctness of DFixer. The evaluation is on 20 deadlocks, including 17 from widely-used real-world C/C++ programs. It shows that DFixer successfully fixed all deadlocks. Whereas GA introduced 9 new deadlocks; a latest work Grail failed to fix 8 deadlocks and introduced 3 new deadlocks on others. On average, DFixer incurred only 2.1% overhead, where GA and Grail incurred 15.8% and 11.5% overhead, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信