雌雄大鼠对新奇事物和自我服用安非他明的行为反应的个体差异

J. E. Klebaur, R. Bevins, T. Segar, M. Bardo
{"title":"雌雄大鼠对新奇事物和自我服用安非他明的行为反应的个体差异","authors":"J. E. Klebaur, R. Bevins, T. Segar, M. Bardo","doi":"10.1097/00008877-200107000-00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous work has shown that individual differences in locomotor activity in an inescapable novel environment can predict acquisition of amphetamine self‐administration. The current study examined whether individual differences in approach to novelty in a free choice test could also predict amphetamine self‐administration. Further, the current study examined whether individual differences in either free choice or inescapable novelty tests could predict responding for a nondrug reinforcer (sucrose) in the presence and absence of amphetamine. Male and female rats were first tested for their response to free choice novelty (playground maze and novelty‐induced place preference tests) and inescapable novelty. They were then tested for acquisition of sucrose‐reinforced responding, amphetamine‐induced changes in maintenance of sucrose‐reinforced responding, and amphetamine self‐administration. Based on the inescapable novelty test, acquisition of sucrose‐reinforced responding was more rapid in male high responders (HR) compared to low responders (LR). This effect in males did not generalize to females. None of the novelty tests predicted the ability of amphetamine to decrease sucrose‐maintained responding. However, using the inescapable novelty test, both male and female HRs self‐administered more amphetamine than LRs within the dose range tested (0.03–0.16 mg/kg/infusion). Neither the playground maze nor the novelty‐induced place preference test predicted amphetamine self‐administration. These results indicate that responses to free choice novelty and inescapable novelty predict different components of amphetamine‐induced behavior.","PeriodicalId":8741,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Pharmacology","volume":"1 1","pages":"267-275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"105","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual differences in behavioral responses to novelty and amphetamine self‐administration in male and female rats\",\"authors\":\"J. E. Klebaur, R. Bevins, T. Segar, M. Bardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/00008877-200107000-00005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous work has shown that individual differences in locomotor activity in an inescapable novel environment can predict acquisition of amphetamine self‐administration. The current study examined whether individual differences in approach to novelty in a free choice test could also predict amphetamine self‐administration. Further, the current study examined whether individual differences in either free choice or inescapable novelty tests could predict responding for a nondrug reinforcer (sucrose) in the presence and absence of amphetamine. Male and female rats were first tested for their response to free choice novelty (playground maze and novelty‐induced place preference tests) and inescapable novelty. They were then tested for acquisition of sucrose‐reinforced responding, amphetamine‐induced changes in maintenance of sucrose‐reinforced responding, and amphetamine self‐administration. Based on the inescapable novelty test, acquisition of sucrose‐reinforced responding was more rapid in male high responders (HR) compared to low responders (LR). This effect in males did not generalize to females. None of the novelty tests predicted the ability of amphetamine to decrease sucrose‐maintained responding. However, using the inescapable novelty test, both male and female HRs self‐administered more amphetamine than LRs within the dose range tested (0.03–0.16 mg/kg/infusion). Neither the playground maze nor the novelty‐induced place preference test predicted amphetamine self‐administration. These results indicate that responses to free choice novelty and inescapable novelty predict different components of amphetamine‐induced behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"267-275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"105\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008877-200107000-00005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008877-200107000-00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 105

摘要

先前的研究表明,在不可避免的新环境中,运动活动的个体差异可以预测安非他明自我给药的习得。目前的研究考察了个体在自由选择测试中对新颖性的态度差异是否也可以预测安非他明的自我给药。此外,目前的研究考察了自由选择或不可避免的新奇性测试中的个体差异是否可以预测在安非他明存在和不存在的情况下对非药物强化物(蔗糖)的反应。首先测试了雄性和雌性大鼠对自由选择新颖性(游乐场迷宫和新颖性诱发的地点偏好测试)和不可逃避新颖性的反应。然后测试他们获得蔗糖强化反应,安非他明诱导的维持蔗糖强化反应的变化,以及安非他明自我给药。基于不可逃避新颖性测试,男性高反应者(HR)比低反应者(LR)获得蔗糖强化反应的速度更快。这种效应在男性身上没有推广到女性身上。新颖性试验均未预测安非他明降低蔗糖维持反应的能力。然而,使用不可避免的新颖性测试,在测试剂量范围内(0.03-0.16 mg/kg/次),男性和女性hr自我使用的安非他明都比LRs多。游乐场迷宫和新奇诱导的地点偏好测试都不能预测安非他明的自我服用。这些结果表明,对自由选择新颖性和不可逃避新颖性的反应预测了安非他明诱导行为的不同组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individual differences in behavioral responses to novelty and amphetamine self‐administration in male and female rats
Previous work has shown that individual differences in locomotor activity in an inescapable novel environment can predict acquisition of amphetamine self‐administration. The current study examined whether individual differences in approach to novelty in a free choice test could also predict amphetamine self‐administration. Further, the current study examined whether individual differences in either free choice or inescapable novelty tests could predict responding for a nondrug reinforcer (sucrose) in the presence and absence of amphetamine. Male and female rats were first tested for their response to free choice novelty (playground maze and novelty‐induced place preference tests) and inescapable novelty. They were then tested for acquisition of sucrose‐reinforced responding, amphetamine‐induced changes in maintenance of sucrose‐reinforced responding, and amphetamine self‐administration. Based on the inescapable novelty test, acquisition of sucrose‐reinforced responding was more rapid in male high responders (HR) compared to low responders (LR). This effect in males did not generalize to females. None of the novelty tests predicted the ability of amphetamine to decrease sucrose‐maintained responding. However, using the inescapable novelty test, both male and female HRs self‐administered more amphetamine than LRs within the dose range tested (0.03–0.16 mg/kg/infusion). Neither the playground maze nor the novelty‐induced place preference test predicted amphetamine self‐administration. These results indicate that responses to free choice novelty and inescapable novelty predict different components of amphetamine‐induced behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信