基于句子相似度综合数据识别的重权策略

Taehee Kim, chaeHun Park, Jimin Hong, Radhika Dua, E. Choi, J. Choo
{"title":"基于句子相似度综合数据识别的重权策略","authors":"Taehee Kim, chaeHun Park, Jimin Hong, Radhika Dua, E. Choi, J. Choo","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2208.13376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Semantically meaningful sentence embeddings are important for numerous tasks in natural language processing. To obtain such embeddings, recent studies explored the idea of utilizing synthetically generated data from pretrained language models(PLMs) as a training corpus. However, PLMs often generate sentences different from the ones written by human. We hypothesize that treating all these synthetic examples equally for training can have an adverse effect on learning semantically meaningful embeddings. To analyze this, we first train a classifier that identifies machine-written sentences and observe that the linguistic features of the sentences identified as written by a machine are significantly different from those of human-written sentences. Based on this, we propose a novel approach that first trains the classifier to measure the importance of each sentence. The distilled information from the classifier is then used to train a reliable sentence embedding model. Through extensive evaluation on four real-world datasets, we demonstrate that our model trained on synthetic data generalizes well and outperforms the baselines.","PeriodicalId":91381,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of COLING. International Conference on Computational Linguistics","volume":"40 1","pages":"4853-4863"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reweighting Strategy Based on Synthetic Data Identification for Sentence Similarity\",\"authors\":\"Taehee Kim, chaeHun Park, Jimin Hong, Radhika Dua, E. Choi, J. Choo\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2208.13376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Semantically meaningful sentence embeddings are important for numerous tasks in natural language processing. To obtain such embeddings, recent studies explored the idea of utilizing synthetically generated data from pretrained language models(PLMs) as a training corpus. However, PLMs often generate sentences different from the ones written by human. We hypothesize that treating all these synthetic examples equally for training can have an adverse effect on learning semantically meaningful embeddings. To analyze this, we first train a classifier that identifies machine-written sentences and observe that the linguistic features of the sentences identified as written by a machine are significantly different from those of human-written sentences. Based on this, we propose a novel approach that first trains the classifier to measure the importance of each sentence. The distilled information from the classifier is then used to train a reliable sentence embedding model. Through extensive evaluation on four real-world datasets, we demonstrate that our model trained on synthetic data generalizes well and outperforms the baselines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of COLING. International Conference on Computational Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"4853-4863\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of COLING. International Conference on Computational Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.13376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of COLING. International Conference on Computational Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.13376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语义上有意义的句子嵌入对于自然语言处理中的许多任务都很重要。为了获得这样的嵌入,最近的研究探索了利用预训练语言模型(PLMs)合成生成的数据作为训练语料库的想法。然而,plm经常生成与人类写的句子不同的句子。我们假设在训练中平等地对待所有这些合成示例会对学习语义上有意义的嵌入产生不利影响。为了分析这一点,我们首先训练一个识别机器编写的句子的分类器,并观察到由机器编写的句子的语言特征与人类编写的句子的语言特征明显不同。在此基础上,我们提出了一种新的方法,首先训练分类器来衡量每个句子的重要性。然后使用从分类器中提取的信息来训练可靠的句子嵌入模型。通过对四个真实数据集的广泛评估,我们证明了我们的模型在合成数据上训练得很好,并且优于基线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reweighting Strategy Based on Synthetic Data Identification for Sentence Similarity
Semantically meaningful sentence embeddings are important for numerous tasks in natural language processing. To obtain such embeddings, recent studies explored the idea of utilizing synthetically generated data from pretrained language models(PLMs) as a training corpus. However, PLMs often generate sentences different from the ones written by human. We hypothesize that treating all these synthetic examples equally for training can have an adverse effect on learning semantically meaningful embeddings. To analyze this, we first train a classifier that identifies machine-written sentences and observe that the linguistic features of the sentences identified as written by a machine are significantly different from those of human-written sentences. Based on this, we propose a novel approach that first trains the classifier to measure the importance of each sentence. The distilled information from the classifier is then used to train a reliable sentence embedding model. Through extensive evaluation on four real-world datasets, we demonstrate that our model trained on synthetic data generalizes well and outperforms the baselines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信