批判性思维、动态能力和项目绩效:持续改进项目领域的经验证据

IF 3.6 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Jorge Iván Pérez Rave, R. Guerrero, A. S. Vallina, Favián González Echavarría
{"title":"批判性思维、动态能力和项目绩效:持续改进项目领域的经验证据","authors":"Jorge Iván Pérez Rave, R. Guerrero, A. S. Vallina, Favián González Echavarría","doi":"10.1080/14783363.2022.2111994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most continuous improvement (CI) initiatives fail, and most proposals discovering critical success factors of CI focus on the organisational level. There is little empirical evidence supporting these factors at the CI project level. Moreover, current suggestions do not show a dominant set of factors influencing the performance of the CI project. This study empirically investigates the relationships between critical thinking (CT), dynamic capabilities (DC), and project performance (PP) in the CI project domain. The sample consists of 64 projects (unit of analysis), one per organisation. We use PLS-SEM in R and control organisational factors (a binary variable representing top management commitment to the CI project). CT is positively related to DC, and DC is positively related to PP. Unlike previous works, our model focuses not on traditional ‘soft’ organisational factors or ‘hard’ project factors but cognitive factors (CT) and higher-order routines (DC) at the project level. This study extends the current explanation of why CI projects fail or succeed by incorporating CT (of the project team member) as an indirect antecedent of PP through the development of DC of the CI project. Managers and researchers on quality/project/operations management can find valuable insights in this paper to favour future CI initiatives.","PeriodicalId":23149,"journal":{"name":"Total Quality Management & Business Excellence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical thinking, dynamic capabilities, and project performance: empirical evidence in the continuous improvement project domain\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Iván Pérez Rave, R. Guerrero, A. S. Vallina, Favián González Echavarría\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14783363.2022.2111994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most continuous improvement (CI) initiatives fail, and most proposals discovering critical success factors of CI focus on the organisational level. There is little empirical evidence supporting these factors at the CI project level. Moreover, current suggestions do not show a dominant set of factors influencing the performance of the CI project. This study empirically investigates the relationships between critical thinking (CT), dynamic capabilities (DC), and project performance (PP) in the CI project domain. The sample consists of 64 projects (unit of analysis), one per organisation. We use PLS-SEM in R and control organisational factors (a binary variable representing top management commitment to the CI project). CT is positively related to DC, and DC is positively related to PP. Unlike previous works, our model focuses not on traditional ‘soft’ organisational factors or ‘hard’ project factors but cognitive factors (CT) and higher-order routines (DC) at the project level. This study extends the current explanation of why CI projects fail or succeed by incorporating CT (of the project team member) as an indirect antecedent of PP through the development of DC of the CI project. Managers and researchers on quality/project/operations management can find valuable insights in this paper to favour future CI initiatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Total Quality Management & Business Excellence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Total Quality Management & Business Excellence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2022.2111994\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Total Quality Management & Business Excellence","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2022.2111994","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数持续改进(CI)计划都失败了,大多数发现CI关键成功因素的建议都集中在组织层面。在CI项目层面上,很少有经验证据支持这些因素。此外,目前的建议并没有显示出影响CI项目绩效的主要因素。本研究实证研究了CI项目领域中批判性思维(CT)、动态能力(DC)和项目绩效(PP)之间的关系。样本包含64个项目(分析单元),每个组织一个。我们在R中使用PLS-SEM并控制组织因素(代表最高管理层对CI项目的承诺的二元变量)。CT与DC正相关,DC与PP正相关。与以往的研究不同,我们的模型没有关注传统的“软”组织因素或“硬”项目因素,而是关注项目层面的认知因素(CT)和高阶惯例(DC)。本研究通过开发CI项目的DC,将CT(项目团队成员的CT)作为PP的间接先行词,扩展了目前对CI项目失败或成功的解释。质量/项目/运营管理的经理和研究人员可以在本文中找到有价值的见解,以支持未来的CI计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical thinking, dynamic capabilities, and project performance: empirical evidence in the continuous improvement project domain
Most continuous improvement (CI) initiatives fail, and most proposals discovering critical success factors of CI focus on the organisational level. There is little empirical evidence supporting these factors at the CI project level. Moreover, current suggestions do not show a dominant set of factors influencing the performance of the CI project. This study empirically investigates the relationships between critical thinking (CT), dynamic capabilities (DC), and project performance (PP) in the CI project domain. The sample consists of 64 projects (unit of analysis), one per organisation. We use PLS-SEM in R and control organisational factors (a binary variable representing top management commitment to the CI project). CT is positively related to DC, and DC is positively related to PP. Unlike previous works, our model focuses not on traditional ‘soft’ organisational factors or ‘hard’ project factors but cognitive factors (CT) and higher-order routines (DC) at the project level. This study extends the current explanation of why CI projects fail or succeed by incorporating CT (of the project team member) as an indirect antecedent of PP through the development of DC of the CI project. Managers and researchers on quality/project/operations management can find valuable insights in this paper to favour future CI initiatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Total Quality Management & Business Excellence is an international journal which sets out to stimulate thought and research in all aspects of total quality management and to provide a natural forum for discussion and dissemination of research results. The journal is designed to encourage interest in all matters relating to total quality management and is intended to appeal to both the academic and professional community working in this area. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence is the culture of an organization committed to customer satisfaction through continuous improvement. This culture varies both from one country to another and between different industries, but has certain essential principles which can be implemented to secure greater market share, increased profits and reduced costs. The journal provides up-to-date research, consultancy work and case studies right across the whole field including quality culture, quality strategy, quality systems, tools and techniques of total quality management and the implementation in both the manufacturing and service sectors. No topics relating to total quality management are excluded from consideration in order to develop business excellence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信