昏迷的“蔬菜”还是超级薯片?帕特里克的残疾和不能动

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN
Rebecca Johinke
{"title":"昏迷的“蔬菜”还是超级薯片?帕特里克的残疾和不能动","authors":"Rebecca Johinke","doi":"10.1353/apo.2022.a906035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article locates a number of 1970s Australian horror films in relation to British and American biomedical horror films featuring characters with disability who are gifted with telekinesis (making them \"supercrips\") and characters who are in a coma and labeled \"vegetables.\" It employs scholarship by Paul Longmore, Matthew Norden, Angela Smith, Paul Darke, Robert Cettl, Sami Schalk, and others to interrogate how Australian genre film represents disability on-screen. An argument is made that while Ozploitation films like The Cars That Ate Paris (1974) and the first Mad Max film (1979) center on the car and mobility in Australian culture, Richard Franklin's Patrick (1978) draws attention to masculinity, immobility, and disability. Tapping into tropes about \"monstrous\" disabled others, Franklin creates a memorable disabled protagonist who evokes fear and dread via his telekinetic powers while also drawing attention to the plight of patients who are the victims of medical malpractice. A hyperbolic 2013 remake directed by Mark Hartley also explores the theme of masculinity and mobility and further exploits the Oedipal theme and the cure-or-kill trope. Both the original and the adaptation, this article argues, mine horror stereotypes about disability while also creating a character who is powerful rather than a passive object of pity.","PeriodicalId":41595,"journal":{"name":"Antipodes-A Global Journal of Australian/New Zealand Literature","volume":"25 1","pages":"64 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comatose \\\"Vegetable\\\" or Supercrip? Disability and Immobility in Patrick\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Johinke\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/apo.2022.a906035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article locates a number of 1970s Australian horror films in relation to British and American biomedical horror films featuring characters with disability who are gifted with telekinesis (making them \\\"supercrips\\\") and characters who are in a coma and labeled \\\"vegetables.\\\" It employs scholarship by Paul Longmore, Matthew Norden, Angela Smith, Paul Darke, Robert Cettl, Sami Schalk, and others to interrogate how Australian genre film represents disability on-screen. An argument is made that while Ozploitation films like The Cars That Ate Paris (1974) and the first Mad Max film (1979) center on the car and mobility in Australian culture, Richard Franklin's Patrick (1978) draws attention to masculinity, immobility, and disability. Tapping into tropes about \\\"monstrous\\\" disabled others, Franklin creates a memorable disabled protagonist who evokes fear and dread via his telekinetic powers while also drawing attention to the plight of patients who are the victims of medical malpractice. A hyperbolic 2013 remake directed by Mark Hartley also explores the theme of masculinity and mobility and further exploits the Oedipal theme and the cure-or-kill trope. Both the original and the adaptation, this article argues, mine horror stereotypes about disability while also creating a character who is powerful rather than a passive object of pity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antipodes-A Global Journal of Australian/New Zealand Literature\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"64 - 77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antipodes-A Global Journal of Australian/New Zealand Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/apo.2022.a906035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antipodes-A Global Journal of Australian/New Zealand Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/apo.2022.a906035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文将20世纪70年代的一些澳大利亚恐怖电影与英美生物医学恐怖电影进行比较,这些电影中有具有心灵遥感能力的残疾人物(使他们成为“超级瘸子”)和处于昏迷状态的人物(被称为“蔬菜”)。它利用保罗·朗莫尔、马修·诺登、安吉拉·史密斯、保罗·达克、罗伯特·塞特、萨米·沙尔克等人的奖学金,探讨澳大利亚类型电影如何在银幕上表现残疾人。有一种观点认为,虽然像《毁灭巴黎的汽车》(1974)和第一部《疯狂的麦克斯》(1979)这样的剥削电影关注的是澳大利亚文化中的汽车和机动性,但理查德·富兰克林的《帕特里克》(1978)关注的是男子气概、不动和残疾。利用“可怕的”残疾人的比喻,富兰克林创造了一个令人难忘的残疾人主人公,他通过他的心灵感应能力唤起了恐惧和恐惧,同时也引起了人们对医疗事故受害者的困境的关注。2013年,马克·哈特利(Mark Hartley)导演的一部夸张翻拍版也探讨了男子气概和机动性的主题,并进一步利用了俄狄浦斯主题和“非医即死”的比喻。本文认为,无论是原作还是改编版,都在塑造一个强大的角色,而不是一个被动的可怜对象的同时,塑造了对残疾的恐怖刻板印象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comatose "Vegetable" or Supercrip? Disability and Immobility in Patrick
Abstract:This article locates a number of 1970s Australian horror films in relation to British and American biomedical horror films featuring characters with disability who are gifted with telekinesis (making them "supercrips") and characters who are in a coma and labeled "vegetables." It employs scholarship by Paul Longmore, Matthew Norden, Angela Smith, Paul Darke, Robert Cettl, Sami Schalk, and others to interrogate how Australian genre film represents disability on-screen. An argument is made that while Ozploitation films like The Cars That Ate Paris (1974) and the first Mad Max film (1979) center on the car and mobility in Australian culture, Richard Franklin's Patrick (1978) draws attention to masculinity, immobility, and disability. Tapping into tropes about "monstrous" disabled others, Franklin creates a memorable disabled protagonist who evokes fear and dread via his telekinetic powers while also drawing attention to the plight of patients who are the victims of medical malpractice. A hyperbolic 2013 remake directed by Mark Hartley also explores the theme of masculinity and mobility and further exploits the Oedipal theme and the cure-or-kill trope. Both the original and the adaptation, this article argues, mine horror stereotypes about disability while also creating a character who is powerful rather than a passive object of pity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antipodes-A Global Journal of Australian/New Zealand Literature
Antipodes-A Global Journal of Australian/New Zealand Literature LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信