公司治理与政府研发资助效率

IF 1.9 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Illoong Kwon, Chan-Young Park
{"title":"公司治理与政府研发资助效率","authors":"Illoong Kwon, Chan-Young Park","doi":"10.1080/1226508X.2021.1908156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Using the unique grant level data, this paper shows that government R&D grants to private firms lead to more innovation when independent monitoring (e.g. outside directors) in the grant receiving firms is stronger, but to less innovation when chaebol influence (e.g. affiliated ownership) is stronger. However, the direct effect of independent monitoring on reported innovation is negative, while that of chaebol influence is positive. These results are consistent with the hypotheses that independent monitoring reduces the misuse of grant money; increases the efficiency of managing R&D grants; and reduces the overstatement of grant outcomes, while chaebol influence does the opposite.","PeriodicalId":45235,"journal":{"name":"Global Economic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Governance and the Efficiency of Government R&D Grants\",\"authors\":\"Illoong Kwon, Chan-Young Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1226508X.2021.1908156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Using the unique grant level data, this paper shows that government R&D grants to private firms lead to more innovation when independent monitoring (e.g. outside directors) in the grant receiving firms is stronger, but to less innovation when chaebol influence (e.g. affiliated ownership) is stronger. However, the direct effect of independent monitoring on reported innovation is negative, while that of chaebol influence is positive. These results are consistent with the hypotheses that independent monitoring reduces the misuse of grant money; increases the efficiency of managing R&D grants; and reduces the overstatement of grant outcomes, while chaebol influence does the opposite.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Economic Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2021.1908156\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2021.1908156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本文利用独特的资助水平数据,表明政府对民营企业的研发资助在接受资助企业内部独立监督(如外部董事)较强的情况下会导致更多的创新,而在财阀影响(如附属所有权)较强的情况下会导致较少的创新。然而,独立监督对报告创新的直接影响是负的,而财阀影响是正的。这些结果与独立监督减少拨款滥用的假设是一致的;提高管理研发经费的效率;并减少了对拨款结果的夸大,而财阀的影响恰恰相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corporate Governance and the Efficiency of Government R&D Grants
ABSTRACT Using the unique grant level data, this paper shows that government R&D grants to private firms lead to more innovation when independent monitoring (e.g. outside directors) in the grant receiving firms is stronger, but to less innovation when chaebol influence (e.g. affiliated ownership) is stronger. However, the direct effect of independent monitoring on reported innovation is negative, while that of chaebol influence is positive. These results are consistent with the hypotheses that independent monitoring reduces the misuse of grant money; increases the efficiency of managing R&D grants; and reduces the overstatement of grant outcomes, while chaebol influence does the opposite.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信