IPO评级:信用评级机构的选择是否影响过低定价?

Souvik Banerjee
{"title":"IPO评级:信用评级机构的选择是否影响过低定价?","authors":"Souvik Banerjee","doi":"10.1109/ICBIM.2014.6970939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we explored the Initial Public Offer (IPO) grading as introduced by the Indian Capital Market Regulator (SEBI). Around six years have passed after, IPO Grading was made mandatory. There are both proponents and opponents of this move, among the various stakeholders of the Indian capital market. The aim of this exercise was to disseminate relevant information in the public domain. There are five Credit Rating Agencies, registered with the regulator, and entrusted with the grading of the IPO bound companies. One of the expected outcome of the IPO grading is efficient price discovery. Post listing the stock price may settle down at the same level, lower or higher than the offer price, at the close of the first day's trading. If the price settles higher than the offer price, the issue was under priced. In this paper we explored whether IPOs graded by various credit rating agencies, have the same extent of under pricing. The statistical analysis showed, that there is no significant difference in under pricing, as far as different companies graded by the different credit rating agencies are concerned.","PeriodicalId":6549,"journal":{"name":"2014 2nd International Conference on Business and Information Management (ICBIM)","volume":"2 1","pages":"32-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IPO grading: Do selection of Credit Rating Agencies affect under pricing?\",\"authors\":\"Souvik Banerjee\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICBIM.2014.6970939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we explored the Initial Public Offer (IPO) grading as introduced by the Indian Capital Market Regulator (SEBI). Around six years have passed after, IPO Grading was made mandatory. There are both proponents and opponents of this move, among the various stakeholders of the Indian capital market. The aim of this exercise was to disseminate relevant information in the public domain. There are five Credit Rating Agencies, registered with the regulator, and entrusted with the grading of the IPO bound companies. One of the expected outcome of the IPO grading is efficient price discovery. Post listing the stock price may settle down at the same level, lower or higher than the offer price, at the close of the first day's trading. If the price settles higher than the offer price, the issue was under priced. In this paper we explored whether IPOs graded by various credit rating agencies, have the same extent of under pricing. The statistical analysis showed, that there is no significant difference in under pricing, as far as different companies graded by the different credit rating agencies are concerned.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 2nd International Conference on Business and Information Management (ICBIM)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"32-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 2nd International Conference on Business and Information Management (ICBIM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBIM.2014.6970939\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 2nd International Conference on Business and Information Management (ICBIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBIM.2014.6970939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了印度资本市场监管机构(SEBI)引入的首次公开发行(IPO)评级制度。大约六年过去了,IPO评级成为强制性规定。在印度资本市场的各个利益相关者中,这一举措既有支持者,也有反对者。这项工作的目的是在公共领域传播有关资料。在监管机构注册的信用评级机构有五家,负责对IPO绑定公司进行评级。IPO评级的预期结果之一是有效的价格发现。上市后的股票价格可以在第一个交易日收盘时以低于或高于要约价格的水平收盘。如果发行价高于发行价,则说明发行价过低。本文探讨了不同信用评级机构评级的ipo是否存在相同程度的低定价。统计分析表明,在不同信用评级机构对不同公司进行评级的情况下,不存在明显的低定价差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IPO grading: Do selection of Credit Rating Agencies affect under pricing?
In this paper we explored the Initial Public Offer (IPO) grading as introduced by the Indian Capital Market Regulator (SEBI). Around six years have passed after, IPO Grading was made mandatory. There are both proponents and opponents of this move, among the various stakeholders of the Indian capital market. The aim of this exercise was to disseminate relevant information in the public domain. There are five Credit Rating Agencies, registered with the regulator, and entrusted with the grading of the IPO bound companies. One of the expected outcome of the IPO grading is efficient price discovery. Post listing the stock price may settle down at the same level, lower or higher than the offer price, at the close of the first day's trading. If the price settles higher than the offer price, the issue was under priced. In this paper we explored whether IPOs graded by various credit rating agencies, have the same extent of under pricing. The statistical analysis showed, that there is no significant difference in under pricing, as far as different companies graded by the different credit rating agencies are concerned.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信