选择经典和新型抗癫痫药物-作用机制,神经保护,和有效性在癫痫和非癫痫条件

M. Chrościńska-Krawczyk, Magdalena Wałek, Bożydar Tylus, S. Czuczwar
{"title":"选择经典和新型抗癫痫药物-作用机制,神经保护,和有效性在癫痫和非癫痫条件","authors":"M. Chrościńska-Krawczyk, Magdalena Wałek, Bożydar Tylus, S. Czuczwar","doi":"10.1515/JOEPI-2015-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Introduction One of the most common neurological disorders is epilepsy, characterised by recurrent spontaneus seizures. Although not fully efficient in ca 30% of patients, pharmacologic treatment of epilepsy plays an important therapeutic approach not only against epilepsy. Aim To provide data on the mechanism of action, activity and neuroprotective efficacy in experimental conditions, clinical efficacy against epilepsy and non-epileptic diseases of major, classical and newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs – lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam, valproate and carbamazepine). Methods A literature search for publications written in English, preferably published within a period of the last fifteen years, using the key words listed below. Review The majority of AEDs possess more than one mechanism of action. They exert their effect by acting on various receptors (different types of glutamatergic and mainly GABAA receptors), neurotransmitters (mainly glutamate or GABA) and voltage-gated ion channels (sodium or calcium ion channels). All reviewed AEDs possess neuroprotective activity, the weakest being carbamazepine. Apart from epilepsy, AEDs may be also used in the pharmacotherapy of migraine, neuropathic pain, spasticity, psychiatric disorders and Parkinsons’s or Alzheimer’s diseases. Conclusions As highlighted above, around 30% of epileptic patients do not substantially benefit from AEDs. It is possible that rational combinations of AEDs, based upon experimental studies, could improve this outcome. The neuroprotective effects of AEDs may point to their disease-modifying activity.","PeriodicalId":15683,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epileptology","volume":"28 1","pages":"37 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selected classical and novel antiepileptic drugs – mechanisms of action, neuroprotection, and effectiveness in epileptic and non-epileptic conditions\",\"authors\":\"M. Chrościńska-Krawczyk, Magdalena Wałek, Bożydar Tylus, S. Czuczwar\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/JOEPI-2015-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Introduction One of the most common neurological disorders is epilepsy, characterised by recurrent spontaneus seizures. Although not fully efficient in ca 30% of patients, pharmacologic treatment of epilepsy plays an important therapeutic approach not only against epilepsy. Aim To provide data on the mechanism of action, activity and neuroprotective efficacy in experimental conditions, clinical efficacy against epilepsy and non-epileptic diseases of major, classical and newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs – lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam, valproate and carbamazepine). Methods A literature search for publications written in English, preferably published within a period of the last fifteen years, using the key words listed below. Review The majority of AEDs possess more than one mechanism of action. They exert their effect by acting on various receptors (different types of glutamatergic and mainly GABAA receptors), neurotransmitters (mainly glutamate or GABA) and voltage-gated ion channels (sodium or calcium ion channels). All reviewed AEDs possess neuroprotective activity, the weakest being carbamazepine. Apart from epilepsy, AEDs may be also used in the pharmacotherapy of migraine, neuropathic pain, spasticity, psychiatric disorders and Parkinsons’s or Alzheimer’s diseases. Conclusions As highlighted above, around 30% of epileptic patients do not substantially benefit from AEDs. It is possible that rational combinations of AEDs, based upon experimental studies, could improve this outcome. The neuroprotective effects of AEDs may point to their disease-modifying activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Epileptology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"37 - 50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Epileptology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/JOEPI-2015-0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epileptology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/JOEPI-2015-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

癫痫是最常见的神经系统疾病之一,其特点是反复发作。虽然在约30%的患者中不完全有效,但药物治疗癫痫不仅对癫痫起着重要的治疗作用。目的了解主要、经典和新型抗癫痫药物(拉莫三嗪、托吡酯、左乙拉西坦、丙戊酸酯和卡马西平)在实验条件下的作用机制、活性和神经保护作用,以及对癫痫和非癫痫性疾病的临床疗效。方法用以下关键词检索近15年出版的英文出版物。大多数aed具有不止一种作用机制。它们通过作用于各种受体(不同类型的谷氨酸能受体,主要是GABAA受体)、神经递质(主要是谷氨酸或GABA)和电压门控离子通道(钠离子或钙离子通道)来发挥作用。所有AEDs均具有神经保护作用,其中卡马西平最弱。除癫痫外,抗癫痫药还可用于偏头痛、神经性疼痛、痉挛、精神疾病、帕金森病或阿尔茨海默病的药物治疗。如上所述,大约30%的癫痫患者并未从aed中获益。在实验研究的基础上,合理组合AEDs可能会改善这一结果。抗癫痫药的神经保护作用可能指向它们的疾病调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selected classical and novel antiepileptic drugs – mechanisms of action, neuroprotection, and effectiveness in epileptic and non-epileptic conditions
Summary Introduction One of the most common neurological disorders is epilepsy, characterised by recurrent spontaneus seizures. Although not fully efficient in ca 30% of patients, pharmacologic treatment of epilepsy plays an important therapeutic approach not only against epilepsy. Aim To provide data on the mechanism of action, activity and neuroprotective efficacy in experimental conditions, clinical efficacy against epilepsy and non-epileptic diseases of major, classical and newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs – lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam, valproate and carbamazepine). Methods A literature search for publications written in English, preferably published within a period of the last fifteen years, using the key words listed below. Review The majority of AEDs possess more than one mechanism of action. They exert their effect by acting on various receptors (different types of glutamatergic and mainly GABAA receptors), neurotransmitters (mainly glutamate or GABA) and voltage-gated ion channels (sodium or calcium ion channels). All reviewed AEDs possess neuroprotective activity, the weakest being carbamazepine. Apart from epilepsy, AEDs may be also used in the pharmacotherapy of migraine, neuropathic pain, spasticity, psychiatric disorders and Parkinsons’s or Alzheimer’s diseases. Conclusions As highlighted above, around 30% of epileptic patients do not substantially benefit from AEDs. It is possible that rational combinations of AEDs, based upon experimental studies, could improve this outcome. The neuroprotective effects of AEDs may point to their disease-modifying activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信