{"title":"目的比较0.5%马来酸替洛尔与0.5%马来酸替洛尔+ 0.2%酒石酸溴硝定固定联合治疗Nd-Yag激光囊膜切除术患者眼压升高的疗效。","authors":"I. Ullah, M. Israr, J. Khan, Mushtaq Khatak","doi":"10.47672/ajhmn.933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of Timolol maleate alone vs fixed combination of Timolol maleate 0.5% with Brimonidine 0.2% in patients undergone Nd-Yag laser capsulotomy. \nMethodology: 100 patients with posterior capsular opacification were enrolled though OPD. They were placed in 2 groups with 50 patients each. Group A received Timolol maleate 0.5% alone while group B received combination of timolol maleate with Brimonidine tartrate. \nResults: In group A 3 patients developed acute raise of intraocular pressure despite of Timolol maleate use while goup B patients who received combination of Timolo maleate and Brimonidine had controlled intraocular pressure. \nConclusion: Fixed combination of Timolo maleate 0.5% and Bremonidine tartrate 0.2 % is more effective in controlling of IOP raise in patients undergone Nd-Yag laser capsulotomy for posterior capsular opacification then Timolo maleate0.5% alone.","PeriodicalId":7672,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To compare the efficacy of timolol maleate 0.5% vs fixed combination of timolol maleate 0.5%, and brimonidine tartrate 0.2% in control of raised intra ocular pressure in patients undergone Nd-Yag laser capsulotomy.\",\"authors\":\"I. Ullah, M. Israr, J. Khan, Mushtaq Khatak\",\"doi\":\"10.47672/ajhmn.933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of Timolol maleate alone vs fixed combination of Timolol maleate 0.5% with Brimonidine 0.2% in patients undergone Nd-Yag laser capsulotomy. \\nMethodology: 100 patients with posterior capsular opacification were enrolled though OPD. They were placed in 2 groups with 50 patients each. Group A received Timolol maleate 0.5% alone while group B received combination of timolol maleate with Brimonidine tartrate. \\nResults: In group A 3 patients developed acute raise of intraocular pressure despite of Timolol maleate use while goup B patients who received combination of Timolo maleate and Brimonidine had controlled intraocular pressure. \\nConclusion: Fixed combination of Timolo maleate 0.5% and Bremonidine tartrate 0.2 % is more effective in controlling of IOP raise in patients undergone Nd-Yag laser capsulotomy for posterior capsular opacification then Timolo maleate0.5% alone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47672/ajhmn.933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ajhmn.933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
To compare the efficacy of timolol maleate 0.5% vs fixed combination of timolol maleate 0.5%, and brimonidine tartrate 0.2% in control of raised intra ocular pressure in patients undergone Nd-Yag laser capsulotomy.
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of Timolol maleate alone vs fixed combination of Timolol maleate 0.5% with Brimonidine 0.2% in patients undergone Nd-Yag laser capsulotomy.
Methodology: 100 patients with posterior capsular opacification were enrolled though OPD. They were placed in 2 groups with 50 patients each. Group A received Timolol maleate 0.5% alone while group B received combination of timolol maleate with Brimonidine tartrate.
Results: In group A 3 patients developed acute raise of intraocular pressure despite of Timolol maleate use while goup B patients who received combination of Timolo maleate and Brimonidine had controlled intraocular pressure.
Conclusion: Fixed combination of Timolo maleate 0.5% and Bremonidine tartrate 0.2 % is more effective in controlling of IOP raise in patients undergone Nd-Yag laser capsulotomy for posterior capsular opacification then Timolo maleate0.5% alone.