网格化身体:医学院校教学触碰的地形调查

Anna Harris
{"title":"网格化身体:医学院校教学触碰的地形调查","authors":"Anna Harris","doi":"10.1080/17458927.2022.2157971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recent technological interventions in healthcare, such as robots or artificial intelligence are often described as being made with algorithms and data points, in contrast to human care, which is couched in terms of intimacy and fleshy encounters, exemplified in the sensory act of touch. In this article I problematize such distinctions by looking at how training the sensory skills of diagnosis also involves technologies with data points, specifically grids. Drawing from ethnographic fieldwork in what is known as a “skills laboratory” in the Netherlands, I focus on how students learn how to perform an abdominal examination, a tactile practice learnt via a grid. Bringing ethnographic material into dialogue with accounts of grids in art history, history of science and computer science, I suggest that gridding is an important, multisensory and multimodal practice of boundary-making in medicine, but that moreover it helps build clinical perception. In doing so, just as in the making of robots and smart machines, these grids enact their own biopolitical assumptions. This article develops an empirical and theoretical understanding of how technologies and flesh become affectively entangled in the very earliest of clinical encounters.","PeriodicalId":75188,"journal":{"name":"The senses and society","volume":"2 1","pages":"139 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gridding bodies: a topographical survey of teaching touch in medical school\",\"authors\":\"Anna Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17458927.2022.2157971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Recent technological interventions in healthcare, such as robots or artificial intelligence are often described as being made with algorithms and data points, in contrast to human care, which is couched in terms of intimacy and fleshy encounters, exemplified in the sensory act of touch. In this article I problematize such distinctions by looking at how training the sensory skills of diagnosis also involves technologies with data points, specifically grids. Drawing from ethnographic fieldwork in what is known as a “skills laboratory” in the Netherlands, I focus on how students learn how to perform an abdominal examination, a tactile practice learnt via a grid. Bringing ethnographic material into dialogue with accounts of grids in art history, history of science and computer science, I suggest that gridding is an important, multisensory and multimodal practice of boundary-making in medicine, but that moreover it helps build clinical perception. In doing so, just as in the making of robots and smart machines, these grids enact their own biopolitical assumptions. This article develops an empirical and theoretical understanding of how technologies and flesh become affectively entangled in the very earliest of clinical encounters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The senses and society\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"139 - 152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The senses and society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2022.2157971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The senses and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2022.2157971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近医疗保健领域的技术干预,如机器人或人工智能,通常被描述为由算法和数据点组成,与人类护理形成鲜明对比,人类护理以亲密和肉体接触为基础,例如触摸的感官行为。在这篇文章中,我通过观察如何训练诊断的感觉技能也涉及数据点,特别是网格技术,来对这种区别提出问题。从荷兰一个被称为“技能实验室”的民族志实地考察中,我关注学生如何学习如何进行腹部检查,这是一种通过网格学习的触觉练习。将人种学材料与艺术史、科学史和计算机科学中的网格进行对话,我认为网格是医学中重要的、多感官和多模式的边界划分实践,而且它有助于建立临床感知。在这样做的过程中,就像制造机器人和智能机器一样,这些网格制定了自己的生物政治假设。这篇文章发展了一个经验和理论的理解,如何技术和肉体成为有效地纠缠在最早的临床遭遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gridding bodies: a topographical survey of teaching touch in medical school
ABSTRACT Recent technological interventions in healthcare, such as robots or artificial intelligence are often described as being made with algorithms and data points, in contrast to human care, which is couched in terms of intimacy and fleshy encounters, exemplified in the sensory act of touch. In this article I problematize such distinctions by looking at how training the sensory skills of diagnosis also involves technologies with data points, specifically grids. Drawing from ethnographic fieldwork in what is known as a “skills laboratory” in the Netherlands, I focus on how students learn how to perform an abdominal examination, a tactile practice learnt via a grid. Bringing ethnographic material into dialogue with accounts of grids in art history, history of science and computer science, I suggest that gridding is an important, multisensory and multimodal practice of boundary-making in medicine, but that moreover it helps build clinical perception. In doing so, just as in the making of robots and smart machines, these grids enact their own biopolitical assumptions. This article develops an empirical and theoretical understanding of how technologies and flesh become affectively entangled in the very earliest of clinical encounters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信