秩序不平衡测度的解释力

IF 0.9 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
B. H. Johnson, Ethan D. Watson
{"title":"秩序不平衡测度的解释力","authors":"B. H. Johnson, Ethan D. Watson","doi":"10.1142/S2010139218500039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In modern markets, limit order traders can no longer be characterized as passive traders, which has led some researchers to argue that limit orders, rather than trades, are the informational unit in today’s markets. If this is true, measures such as order imbalance, which uses signed trades and captures the information from liquidity demanders, may not be as valid as they once were. We calculate two measures of limit order imbalance and examine the relation between limit order imbalances and returns. We find evidence that limit order imbalances explain returns, but conclude that traditional order imbalance has more explanatory power. Thus, our results suggest that limit orders have not trumped trades as the informational unit in today’s markets.","PeriodicalId":45339,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Explanatory Power of Order Imbalance Measures\",\"authors\":\"B. H. Johnson, Ethan D. Watson\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S2010139218500039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In modern markets, limit order traders can no longer be characterized as passive traders, which has led some researchers to argue that limit orders, rather than trades, are the informational unit in today’s markets. If this is true, measures such as order imbalance, which uses signed trades and captures the information from liquidity demanders, may not be as valid as they once were. We calculate two measures of limit order imbalance and examine the relation between limit order imbalances and returns. We find evidence that limit order imbalances explain returns, but conclude that traditional order imbalance has more explanatory power. Thus, our results suggest that limit orders have not trumped trades as the informational unit in today’s markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010139218500039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Finance","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010139218500039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在现代市场中,限价单交易者不能再被描述为被动交易者,这使得一些研究人员认为,限价单而不是交易才是当今市场的信息单位。如果这是真的,那么使用已签署交易并从流动性需求方获取信息的订单不平衡等措施可能就不像以前那么有效了。我们计算了限价订单不平衡的两个度量,并检验了限价订单不平衡与收益之间的关系。研究发现,限价订单失衡可以解释收益,但传统订单失衡具有更强的解释力。因此,我们的结果表明,限价订单并没有胜过交易作为信息单位在今天的市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Explanatory Power of Order Imbalance Measures
In modern markets, limit order traders can no longer be characterized as passive traders, which has led some researchers to argue that limit orders, rather than trades, are the informational unit in today’s markets. If this is true, measures such as order imbalance, which uses signed trades and captures the information from liquidity demanders, may not be as valid as they once were. We calculate two measures of limit order imbalance and examine the relation between limit order imbalances and returns. We find evidence that limit order imbalances explain returns, but conclude that traditional order imbalance has more explanatory power. Thus, our results suggest that limit orders have not trumped trades as the informational unit in today’s markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quarterly Journal of Finance
Quarterly Journal of Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of Finance publishes high-quality papers in all areas of finance, including corporate finance, asset pricing, financial econometrics, international finance, macro-finance, behavioral finance, banking and financial intermediation, capital markets, risk management and insurance, derivatives, quantitative finance, corporate governance and compensation, investments and entrepreneurial finance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信