就地法与欧盟内部市场——走向相互承认财产关系

B. Akkermans
{"title":"就地法与欧盟内部市场——走向相互承认财产关系","authors":"B. Akkermans","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3289625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For as long as our modern legal systems exist they have operated on the basis of the lex rei sitae rule. As an expression of the principle of territoriality, the law of a country applies to all objects that are situated on the territory. In domestic cases, of course, the regular rules apply, but in international disputes a legal system uses its own rules to be able to apply its own domestic law. The doctrine of lex rei sitae becomes relevant in a situation in which two legal systems come into contact with one another. A conflict of laws or conflit mobile arises when the law of one country is to be applied in the law of another country. Over the last centuries an intricate system of rules has developed with which private international lawyers resolve conflict of laws by pointing towards one of these legal systems as the applicable law. They do so - at least in theory - blindfolded, so that they cannot favor one legal system over the other. Instead of choosing one system over another, a set of impartial and objective rules is used to determine what legal system is to be applied.<br><br>Private international law theory is, however, less facilitative in practice. In the European Union there is an internal market in which there is free movement of goods, persons, services and capital. This internal market is governed by principles and theory that are very different from the principles and theory underlying private international law. EU law works on the basis of a market functionalism that seeks to allow legal relations to remain to be governed by their country of origin. Property private international law rules are aimed to have legal relations governed by the host country. This tension between two opposite viewpoints is part of a larger tension between the unifying nature of EU Law and the procedural autonomy of the EU Member States. Rather than having EU law decide what is to be the applicable law, in general private international law cases, the host country, i.e. the lex fori, decides this by itself. In the past decade, however, many private international law rules have become EU law to centralise the rule deciding on applicable law and jurisdiction. The EU has therefore claimed competence in the area of applicable law and jurisdiction. However, when property law has been concerned, mostly connection has been sought, also at the EU level to the traditional lex rei sitae rule. In practice however, also an EU lex rei sitae rule turns out to be difficult to apply. The best example of this is perhaps the EU Succession Regulation that allows one single legal system to be applied to an entire cross-border succession case.<br>","PeriodicalId":82443,"journal":{"name":"Real property, probate, and trust journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lex Rei Sitae and the EU Internal Market - Towards Mutual Recognition of Property Relations\",\"authors\":\"B. Akkermans\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3289625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For as long as our modern legal systems exist they have operated on the basis of the lex rei sitae rule. As an expression of the principle of territoriality, the law of a country applies to all objects that are situated on the territory. In domestic cases, of course, the regular rules apply, but in international disputes a legal system uses its own rules to be able to apply its own domestic law. The doctrine of lex rei sitae becomes relevant in a situation in which two legal systems come into contact with one another. A conflict of laws or conflit mobile arises when the law of one country is to be applied in the law of another country. Over the last centuries an intricate system of rules has developed with which private international lawyers resolve conflict of laws by pointing towards one of these legal systems as the applicable law. They do so - at least in theory - blindfolded, so that they cannot favor one legal system over the other. Instead of choosing one system over another, a set of impartial and objective rules is used to determine what legal system is to be applied.<br><br>Private international law theory is, however, less facilitative in practice. In the European Union there is an internal market in which there is free movement of goods, persons, services and capital. This internal market is governed by principles and theory that are very different from the principles and theory underlying private international law. EU law works on the basis of a market functionalism that seeks to allow legal relations to remain to be governed by their country of origin. Property private international law rules are aimed to have legal relations governed by the host country. This tension between two opposite viewpoints is part of a larger tension between the unifying nature of EU Law and the procedural autonomy of the EU Member States. Rather than having EU law decide what is to be the applicable law, in general private international law cases, the host country, i.e. the lex fori, decides this by itself. In the past decade, however, many private international law rules have become EU law to centralise the rule deciding on applicable law and jurisdiction. The EU has therefore claimed competence in the area of applicable law and jurisdiction. However, when property law has been concerned, mostly connection has been sought, also at the EU level to the traditional lex rei sitae rule. In practice however, also an EU lex rei sitae rule turns out to be difficult to apply. The best example of this is perhaps the EU Succession Regulation that allows one single legal system to be applied to an entire cross-border succession case.<br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":82443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Real property, probate, and trust journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Real property, probate, and trust journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3289625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Real property, probate, and trust journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3289625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

只要我们的现代法律制度存在,它们就在就地法规则的基础上运作。作为属地原则的一种表现,一国的法律适用于位于该国领土上的一切物体。当然,在国内案件中,适用的是常规规则,但在国际争端中,一个法律体系使用自己的规则,以便能够适用自己的国内法。在两种法律制度相互接触的情况下,就地法的原则变得相关。当一个国家的法律适用于另一个国家的法律时,就产生了法律冲突或法律冲突。在过去的几个世纪里,一个错综复杂的规则体系已经发展起来,国际私人律师通过指出其中一个法律体系作为适用法律来解决法律冲突。他们这样做——至少在理论上——是蒙着眼睛的,这样他们就不能偏袒某一种法律体系而忽视另一种。不是选择一种制度而不选择另一种制度,而是采用一套公正客观的规则来确定适用何种法律制度。然而,国际私法理论在实践中就不那么便利了。在欧盟,有一个内部市场,商品、人员、服务和资本可以自由流动。这个内部市场所依据的原则和理论与国际私法的基本原则和理论大不相同。欧盟法律是在市场功能主义的基础上运作的,它寻求允许法律关系继续由其原籍国管辖。国际财产私法规则的目的是使法律关系受东道国管辖。两种对立观点之间的紧张关系是欧盟法律的统一性与欧盟成员国的程序自治之间更大的紧张关系的一部分。在一般的国际私法案件中,东道国(即法地法)自行决定适用的法律,而不是由欧盟法律决定适用的法律。然而,在过去十年中,许多国际私法规则已成为欧盟法律,以集中决定适用法律和管辖权的规则。因此,欧盟声称在适用法律和管辖权领域具有管辖权。然而,当涉及物权法时,主要是寻求与传统的就地法规则的联系,也是在欧盟层面。然而,在实践中,欧盟的就地法规则也很难适用。最好的例子可能是欧盟继承条例,它允许一个单一的法律体系适用于整个跨境继承案件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lex Rei Sitae and the EU Internal Market - Towards Mutual Recognition of Property Relations
For as long as our modern legal systems exist they have operated on the basis of the lex rei sitae rule. As an expression of the principle of territoriality, the law of a country applies to all objects that are situated on the territory. In domestic cases, of course, the regular rules apply, but in international disputes a legal system uses its own rules to be able to apply its own domestic law. The doctrine of lex rei sitae becomes relevant in a situation in which two legal systems come into contact with one another. A conflict of laws or conflit mobile arises when the law of one country is to be applied in the law of another country. Over the last centuries an intricate system of rules has developed with which private international lawyers resolve conflict of laws by pointing towards one of these legal systems as the applicable law. They do so - at least in theory - blindfolded, so that they cannot favor one legal system over the other. Instead of choosing one system over another, a set of impartial and objective rules is used to determine what legal system is to be applied.

Private international law theory is, however, less facilitative in practice. In the European Union there is an internal market in which there is free movement of goods, persons, services and capital. This internal market is governed by principles and theory that are very different from the principles and theory underlying private international law. EU law works on the basis of a market functionalism that seeks to allow legal relations to remain to be governed by their country of origin. Property private international law rules are aimed to have legal relations governed by the host country. This tension between two opposite viewpoints is part of a larger tension between the unifying nature of EU Law and the procedural autonomy of the EU Member States. Rather than having EU law decide what is to be the applicable law, in general private international law cases, the host country, i.e. the lex fori, decides this by itself. In the past decade, however, many private international law rules have become EU law to centralise the rule deciding on applicable law and jurisdiction. The EU has therefore claimed competence in the area of applicable law and jurisdiction. However, when property law has been concerned, mostly connection has been sought, also at the EU level to the traditional lex rei sitae rule. In practice however, also an EU lex rei sitae rule turns out to be difficult to apply. The best example of this is perhaps the EU Succession Regulation that allows one single legal system to be applied to an entire cross-border succession case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信