鸡肉丸中添加小麦粉,通过促进肉丸的感官、理化、生化和微生物特性,提高肉丸的食用价值

Meat Research Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI:10.55002/mr.2.4.30
MM Touhid, M. Hasan, M. Kamal, MM Islam, M. Azad, M. Hashem
{"title":"鸡肉丸中添加小麦粉,通过促进肉丸的感官、理化、生化和微生物特性,提高肉丸的食用价值","authors":"MM Touhid, M. Hasan, M. Kamal, MM Islam, M. Azad, M. Hashem","doi":"10.55002/mr.2.4.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of different levels (0%, 20%, 25%, and 30%) of wheat flour on the quality characteristics of chicken meatball. After formulation, samples were stored at -20˚C temperature for 60 days and were analyzed on 15th day, 30th day, 45th day and 60th day. The products were analyzed for various sensory (color, flavor, texture, Juiciness, tenderness, overall acceptability), physicochemical (proximate analysis, pH , cooking loss), biochemical (TBARs, POV, FFA) and microbiological (TVC, TCC, TYMC) characteristics. Data were analyzed in a 4x3 factorial experiment in CRD which is replicated three times per cell. Most preferable sensory evaluation (tenderness, overall acceptability and juiciness), preferable physicochemical properties (raw pH , cooked pH ), most acceptable proximate analysis (DM and ash), biochemical properties (PV and TBA values), and microbiological properties (TVC and TCC value) showed significant (p<0.05) result in 25% wheat flour group among the four treatments. Most found in 25% wheat flour group. Among four treatments, the total yeast-mold count in the control sample (1.70 log CFU/g) was significantly (p<0.05) higher than in the samples treated with 20%, 25% and 30% wheat flour group. The less amount of TYMC value indicates this product is most preferable for consumers’ health. 30% and 25% wheat flour were the most preferable for TYMC. Summary of the present study reveals that meatballs made with 25% wheat flour had the highest tenderness, overall acceptability, raw pH , cooked pH , DM, ash, PV and TBA. Prebiotic is a non-digested food ingredient that promotes the growth of beneficial microorganism in the intestine.","PeriodicalId":18312,"journal":{"name":"Meat Research","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addition of wheat flour in chicken meatball increases the food value through prompting sensory, physicochemical, biochemical and microbial properties\",\"authors\":\"MM Touhid, M. Hasan, M. Kamal, MM Islam, M. Azad, M. Hashem\",\"doi\":\"10.55002/mr.2.4.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of different levels (0%, 20%, 25%, and 30%) of wheat flour on the quality characteristics of chicken meatball. After formulation, samples were stored at -20˚C temperature for 60 days and were analyzed on 15th day, 30th day, 45th day and 60th day. The products were analyzed for various sensory (color, flavor, texture, Juiciness, tenderness, overall acceptability), physicochemical (proximate analysis, pH , cooking loss), biochemical (TBARs, POV, FFA) and microbiological (TVC, TCC, TYMC) characteristics. Data were analyzed in a 4x3 factorial experiment in CRD which is replicated three times per cell. Most preferable sensory evaluation (tenderness, overall acceptability and juiciness), preferable physicochemical properties (raw pH , cooked pH ), most acceptable proximate analysis (DM and ash), biochemical properties (PV and TBA values), and microbiological properties (TVC and TCC value) showed significant (p<0.05) result in 25% wheat flour group among the four treatments. Most found in 25% wheat flour group. Among four treatments, the total yeast-mold count in the control sample (1.70 log CFU/g) was significantly (p<0.05) higher than in the samples treated with 20%, 25% and 30% wheat flour group. The less amount of TYMC value indicates this product is most preferable for consumers’ health. 30% and 25% wheat flour were the most preferable for TYMC. Summary of the present study reveals that meatballs made with 25% wheat flour had the highest tenderness, overall acceptability, raw pH , cooked pH , DM, ash, PV and TBA. Prebiotic is a non-digested food ingredient that promotes the growth of beneficial microorganism in the intestine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meat Research\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meat Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55002/mr.2.4.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Research","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55002/mr.2.4.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本试验旨在评价不同水平(0%、20%、25%和30%)小麦粉对鸡肉肉丸品质特性的影响。配制后于-20℃保存60天,分别于第15天、第30天、第45天、第60天进行分析。分析了产品的各种感官(颜色、风味、质地、多汁性、嫩度、总体可接受度)、理化(近似分析、pH、蒸煮损失)、生化(TBARs、POV、FFA)和微生物(TVC、TCC、TYMC)特性。数据在CRD的4x3析因实验中进行分析,每个细胞重复三次。四种处理中,25%小麦粉组的感官评价(嫩度、总体接受度和多汁性)、理化性质(生pH、熟pH)、近似分析(DM和灰分)、生化性质(PV和TBA值)和微生物性质(TVC和TCC值)均显著高于其他处理(p<0.05)。在25%小麦粉组中发现最多。4个处理中,对照样品的酵母菌总数(1.70 log CFU/g)显著(p<0.05)高于添加20%、25%和30%小麦粉组。TYMC值越低,说明该产品对消费者的健康越有利。30%和25%小麦粉对TYMC最有利。本研究总结表明,添加25%小麦粉的肉丸具有最高的嫩度、总体可接受度、生pH值、熟pH值、DM、灰分、PV和TBA。益生元是一种促进肠道有益微生物生长的非消化食物成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addition of wheat flour in chicken meatball increases the food value through prompting sensory, physicochemical, biochemical and microbial properties
The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of different levels (0%, 20%, 25%, and 30%) of wheat flour on the quality characteristics of chicken meatball. After formulation, samples were stored at -20˚C temperature for 60 days and were analyzed on 15th day, 30th day, 45th day and 60th day. The products were analyzed for various sensory (color, flavor, texture, Juiciness, tenderness, overall acceptability), physicochemical (proximate analysis, pH , cooking loss), biochemical (TBARs, POV, FFA) and microbiological (TVC, TCC, TYMC) characteristics. Data were analyzed in a 4x3 factorial experiment in CRD which is replicated three times per cell. Most preferable sensory evaluation (tenderness, overall acceptability and juiciness), preferable physicochemical properties (raw pH , cooked pH ), most acceptable proximate analysis (DM and ash), biochemical properties (PV and TBA values), and microbiological properties (TVC and TCC value) showed significant (p<0.05) result in 25% wheat flour group among the four treatments. Most found in 25% wheat flour group. Among four treatments, the total yeast-mold count in the control sample (1.70 log CFU/g) was significantly (p<0.05) higher than in the samples treated with 20%, 25% and 30% wheat flour group. The less amount of TYMC value indicates this product is most preferable for consumers’ health. 30% and 25% wheat flour were the most preferable for TYMC. Summary of the present study reveals that meatballs made with 25% wheat flour had the highest tenderness, overall acceptability, raw pH , cooked pH , DM, ash, PV and TBA. Prebiotic is a non-digested food ingredient that promotes the growth of beneficial microorganism in the intestine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信