{"title":"礼仪形成中的互惠","authors":"R. Ferrone","doi":"10.1177/00393207160461-210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T topic I’ve been given to address is perhaps the least well-mapped area our Congress intends to explore. I thought it might be helpful, therefore, to identify five different perspectives on the subject of reciprocity. Within these perspectives I will draw upon the ideas of thinkers in the fields of religious education and catechesis with whom we might dialogue to come to our own insights concerning reciprocity in liturgical formation.1","PeriodicalId":39597,"journal":{"name":"Studia Liturgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reciprocity in Liturgical Formation\",\"authors\":\"R. Ferrone\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00393207160461-210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"T topic I’ve been given to address is perhaps the least well-mapped area our Congress intends to explore. I thought it might be helpful, therefore, to identify five different perspectives on the subject of reciprocity. Within these perspectives I will draw upon the ideas of thinkers in the fields of religious education and catechesis with whom we might dialogue to come to our own insights concerning reciprocity in liturgical formation.1\",\"PeriodicalId\":39597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Liturgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Liturgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00393207160461-210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Liturgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00393207160461-210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
T topic I’ve been given to address is perhaps the least well-mapped area our Congress intends to explore. I thought it might be helpful, therefore, to identify five different perspectives on the subject of reciprocity. Within these perspectives I will draw upon the ideas of thinkers in the fields of religious education and catechesis with whom we might dialogue to come to our own insights concerning reciprocity in liturgical formation.1